- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Is this a fair trade?
Posted on 10/10/17 at 12:42 pm
Posted on 10/10/17 at 12:42 pm
Team A- Recieves Antonio Brown and Eli Manning. Team B- receives Deshaun Watson and Will Fuller. Help me settle a dispute. I say it's not because I don't believe the Texans can sustain what they have done on offense. What say you?
This post was edited on 10/10/17 at 12:43 pm
13
Posted on 10/10/17 at 12:43 pm to PacoDeTaco
quote:
I say it's not because I don't believe the Texans can sustain what they have done on offense. What say you?
By that logic, the trade is fair, because Manning has no WRs, and if Big Ben keeps playing like shite, AB wom't be worth anything either.
Posted on 10/10/17 at 12:44 pm to PacoDeTaco
I would consider vetoing that trade.
Antonio Brown >>>>> D Watson
Antonio Brown >>>>> D Watson
Posted on 10/10/17 at 12:46 pm to Cowboyfan89
Big Ben was shite this past week and brown still put up big numbers. We are a PPR league I forgot to mention
Posted on 10/10/17 at 12:46 pm to PacoDeTaco
It's an awful trade. I don't like vetoing, but I'd at least think about it.
Posted on 10/10/17 at 12:47 pm to Cowboyfan89
I leave Eli out of the equation because the guy already has a good QB- he will ride the bench
Posted on 10/10/17 at 12:48 pm to PacoDeTaco
You don't veto because someone is getting trade raped. You should only veto if there's legitimate reasons to believe the owners are colluding.
Posted on 10/10/17 at 12:49 pm to PacoDeTaco
quote:
. I say it's not because I don't believe the Texans can sustain what they have done on offense.
it doesn't really matter what you believe, if team B believes it than that's how he chooses to manage his team
would I do that deal? No
Posted on 10/10/17 at 12:57 pm to PacoDeTaco
Any reason to suspect one team is trying to gut their team to help the other? If not, no veto
You have to take your personal feelings and expectations out of this.
You have to take your personal feelings and expectations out of this.
Posted on 10/10/17 at 12:57 pm to PacoDeTaco
It's not your responsibility to manage other peoples' teams. If they want to make the trade, and there isn't collusion, let it through.
End of story.
End of story.
Posted on 10/10/17 at 1:01 pm to PacoDeTaco
You only Veto if its obvious one team is colluding with another. Its a terrible trade, but the guy getting Watson clearly likes the double tap and thinks Houston can sustain. You don't veto, you just point and laugh.
Posted on 10/10/17 at 1:03 pm to lsuhunt555
The team getting the crap deal is 1-4. Team getting brown is competing to win the league but doesn't have a top 3 team. It's not even close to an even trade- so it should be vetoed in my opinion.
Posted on 10/10/17 at 1:06 pm to AbitaFan08
I do see it as colluding. Team that is making the poor deal has a terrible team and will not make the playoffs.
Posted on 10/10/17 at 1:07 pm to PacoDeTaco
quote:
so it should be vetoed in my opinion.
I understand its a lopsided trade, but you don't have say so over other people's teams. If the guy was giving AB and getting back a Defense, you veto it.
Posted on 10/10/17 at 1:07 pm to AbitaFan08
quote:
It's not your responsibility to manage other peoples' teams. If they want to make the trade, and there isn't collusion, let it through.
End of story.
Everyone loves to make it out to be black and white, but what constitutes collusion? Do you have to prove it through texts or something? A trade that's bad enough that people think it MIGHT be collusion is still bad for the league, IMO.
Posted on 10/10/17 at 1:11 pm to DallasTiger45
Right, it’s not black and white. If it jeopardizes the integrity of the league it needs to be considered
On the flip, sometimes it’s just a league with people who really don’t have a clue. There are more out there than people think. I’m thinking this is prob the case here
On the flip, sometimes it’s just a league with people who really don’t have a clue. There are more out there than people think. I’m thinking this is prob the case here
Posted on 10/10/17 at 1:14 pm to DallasTiger45
quote:
A trade that's bad enough that people think it MIGHT be collusion is still bad for the league, IMO.
I agree...sort of. I believe that if you could see the angle at which one owner decides its a good trade then you shouldn't veto it. This one is a clear example of that. The guy thinks Watson will keep it up and likes double tap option with Fuller.
Posted on 10/10/17 at 1:16 pm to PacoDeTaco
I would let it be. One guy is most likely buying too high on Fuller but that is his choice. I don’t see that as collusion
Posted on 10/10/17 at 1:40 pm to Cowboyfan89
quote:
Big Ben keeps playing like shite, AB wom't be worth anything either.
he trew five picks and AB still had 10/157 Can't get any worse than that for Big Ben
This post was edited on 10/10/17 at 1:40 pm
Posted on 10/10/17 at 1:49 pm to PacoDeTaco
I'll allow it
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News