- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
So now the schhol decides if Fulton plays?
Posted on 8/10/18 at 4:16 pm
Posted on 8/10/18 at 4:16 pm
From everything I have read so far, the school must now sign a waiver for Fulton to play that would be similar to the injunctions that Elliot was using to play last year.
Any reason the University would choose to not sign this if it gave him immediate eligibility? Does this waiver have to be accepted by another party for Fulton to play or is it as simple as LSU signing the waiver allowing Fulton to play while the case is on going?
I imagine the school would be completely behind one of their own students when the rule is completely bullshite.
Any reason the University would choose to not sign this if it gave him immediate eligibility? Does this waiver have to be accepted by another party for Fulton to play or is it as simple as LSU signing the waiver allowing Fulton to play while the case is on going?
I imagine the school would be completely behind one of their own students when the rule is completely bullshite.
7
Posted on 8/10/18 at 4:18 pm to tigerclaw10
quote:
From everything I have read so far, the school must now sign a waiver for Fulton to play that would be similar to the injunctions that Elliot was using to play last year.
My understanding (could be wrong) is that LSU has to REQUEST the waiver from...wait for it...the NCAA.
The question I have is whether or not there has to be some sort of lawsuit first...and whether or not LSU has to be a party to that lawsuit.
Posted on 8/10/18 at 4:21 pm to tigerclaw10
If it was that easy they would have been done it.
Posted on 8/10/18 at 4:23 pm to tigerclaw10
LSU (like all schools/athletic departments) is a BUNCH of moving pieces. Right now they are moving in completely independently directions. Look at Alabama and they're completely synchronized and that's why they have so much success. There's no infighting or politics or egos. There's just the whole entity moving in the same direction with the same goal.
Posted on 8/10/18 at 4:25 pm to jlovel7
quote:
Look at Alabama and they're completely synchronized and that's why they have so much success.
You are obsessed. Get over it.
Posted on 8/10/18 at 4:27 pm to oOoLsUtIgErSoOo
quote:
You are obsessed. Get over it.
What about that is false? They're the #1 program in college football to emulate and mimic.
Posted on 8/10/18 at 4:37 pm to jlovel7
what exactly does Bama have to do about my topic concerning Fulton?
Posted on 8/10/18 at 4:49 pm to oOoLsUtIgErSoOo
Maybe but is truth
Posted on 8/10/18 at 5:04 pm to jlovel7
quote:
What about that is false?
quote:
LSU is a bunch of moving pieces
Posted on 8/10/18 at 5:11 pm to oOoLsUtIgErSoOo
quote:
You are obsessed. Get over it.
Will I be as cool as you if I pretend LSU has been as successful as Alabama or is there more to it than that?
Posted on 8/10/18 at 5:12 pm to tigerclaw10
I have 100% faith in Alleva and our admin totally fricking this up, no matter what our options are.
Posted on 8/10/18 at 6:34 pm to tigerclaw10
Let’s say they received the waiver and then played Fulton. Then the courts ruled against Fulton would LSU have to then forfeit all the games he played in because they played an ineligible player?
Posted on 8/10/18 at 7:15 pm to Kid nice
LSU would never put itself in danger of sanctions over a CB who cheated. It’s not worth it.
Gotta pick your battles.
Gotta pick your battles.
Posted on 8/10/18 at 7:19 pm to tigerclaw10
quote:
From everything I have read so far, the school must now sign a waiver for Fulton to play that would be similar to the injunctions that Elliot was using to play last year. Any reason the University would choose to not sign this if it gave him immediate eligibility? Does this waiver have to be accepted by another party for Fulton to play or is it as simple as LSU signing the waiver allowing Fulton to play while the case is on going? I imagine the school would be completely behind one of their own students when the rule is completely bullshite.
You are one dumb bastard.
Posted on 8/10/18 at 7:19 pm to Kid nice
I doubt that if they got a waiver..
Posted on 8/10/18 at 7:29 pm to tigerclaw10
quote:
From everything I have read so far, the school must now sign a waiver for Fulton to play that would be similar to the injunctions that Elliot was using to play last year.
Any reason the University would choose to not sign this if it gave him immediate eligibility?
Think before you post, in your scenario the answer would be a resounding YES!!!! You can't put one players needs in front of the teams needs. In your scenario Fulton's situation can still be found not in his favor and if that is the case, what are the consequences for LSU if they decided to play him despite having a resolution? The consequences would be to forfeit all games in which Fulton played in prior to the final outcome. That price is too steep and not fair to the other players if Fulton's case isn't resolved to where he is eligible to play!!!
Posted on 8/10/18 at 7:37 pm to oOoLsUtIgErSoOo
quote:
You are obsessed. Get over it.
Posted on 8/10/18 at 8:01 pm to Kid nice
quote:
Let’s say they received the waiver and then played Fulton. Then the courts ruled against Fulton would LSU have to then forfeit all the games he played in because they played an ineligible player
No the waiver makes him eligible for the time being. If the appeal fails, the time he played under the waiver, would be racked on the end up his suspension.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News