Started By
Message

re: My two negative talking points Re: Dave Aranda

Posted on 11/21/21 at 11:29 am to
Posted by S
RIP Wayde
Member since Jan 2007
155890 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 11:29 am to
quote:

Riley, Kiffin, even Napier, you have the foundation on offense


Riley and Kiffin sure but idk about Napier. His offense just doesn’t really wow me. I feel like every time I’ve watched them they struggle in the red zone and tend to get cute on third down. I wouldn’t hate it but not as enthusiastic as the other 2 and their schemes. And i don’t really want Kiffin at all but his offense is much better than nap.
This post was edited on 11/21/21 at 11:30 am
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278717 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 11:42 am to
quote:

His offense just doesn’t really wow me. I feel like every time I’ve watched them they struggle in the red zone and tend to get cute on third down


It’s not quite as flashy because he kind of inherited this QB, who is limited, and has just played to his strengths

More run oriented in his own creative way. Winning games the old school way but with new school innovation
Posted by beauchristopher
new orleans
Member since Jan 2008
66224 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 12:38 pm to
None of these stats really matter, because of different circumstances. However, I see a trend with what I consider some of the top teams this season.

Total Offense YPG Avg

1. Ohio St.
5. Ole Miss
6. Alabama
24. Baylor
31. OU
34. UGA
65. Louisiana
90. LSU


3rd down conversion

2. Bama
3. Ohio St
18. UGA
35. OU
64. Baylor
78. LSU
86. Ole Miss
87. Louisiana


Offensive TDs

1. Ohio St (61)
2. Alabama (59)
OU (52)
UGA (52)
Ole Miss (49)
Baylor (46)
Louisiana (46)
A&M (33)
LSU (35)
This post was edited on 11/21/21 at 12:41 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram