Started By
Message
locked post

Iconic Target Store on Mission St to Close Amid Shoplifting Tidal Wave

Posted on 10/22/21 at 9:14 am
Posted by djmed
Member since Aug 2020
3717 posts
Posted on 10/22/21 at 9:14 am
I love how the mayor and city council try to say crime is down and blame the stores for closing. what a shiathole

EXCLUSIVE: Iconic Target Store on Mission St to Close Amid Shoplifting Tidal Wave
SFPD tells Globe Mayor Breed falsely claims it’s not about theft, begs company to stay

By Ken Kurson, October 21, 2021 4:12 pm



Last week, after Walgreens announced that five additional outlets in San Francisco would be closing on top of the 17 that already have been shuttered since 2019, the company claimed that changes in both the law and prosecutor attitudes and made it impossible to run a profitable business in the city.

Mayor London Breed challenged that narrative. She attributed the closings to demographic shifts and the Chronicle dutifully reported that “the five stores slated to close had fewer than two recorded shoplifting incidents a month on average since 2018” (while acknowledging that few stores bother to report a crime that now routinely goes unpunished). Everyone who has stood in line at a drugstore and watched thieves shove hundreds of dollars of items down their pants knew that Breed was mistaken at best or lying at worst.



Now, in a Globe exclusive, San Francisco Police Department has revealed that the iconic Target on Mission Street between Third and Fourth Streets will be shutting its doors before the end of the year.

“This store loses $25,000 a day to shoplifting,” an SFPD officer told the Globe in lengthy, taped interviews conducted this week. “That’s $25,000 that walks out the door on average between 9 and 6 every day.”

(The Globe is redacting the officers’ names because of critical remarks made about Mayor London Breed and District Attorney Chesa Boudin that could potentially endanger their jobs.)

“This store does between $80,000 to $120,000 in sales every day. And they lose 25 of it [meaning $25,000]. Even if they’re making 25% profit, the stealing takes that down to zero.”

Asked if the presence of armed, uniformed police officers had any deterrent effect on thieves, one officer was blunt in his assessment.

“They don’t care. There’s no consequences. Literally zero consequences. I’ve kicked out… I’ve been here since 9 AM today. I probably have already kicked out eight or nine people and I’ve recovered a thousand dollars worth of stuff alone off of that. Whether we kick them out, tell them they can’t come back, whether I put them in handcuffs and take them down to the county jail—there is no difference. Because they will not be prosecuted by the district attorney. Therefore, there is nothing documented that they can’t come back here. You know, they get no time in jail to think about what they did, right? There is zero consequence. And that’s why in this store the same exact people come in every other day and in the city the same couple percent of people are the same people committing all the car break-ins, all the robberies and all the shootings, any aggravated assaults right in town where there’s more street people, people fighting. It’s all the same exact people, and there are zero consequences. Therefore you take them to jail they get out of jail. They do it again. It’s a big circle.”


Even bulky, hard-to-steal items are kept behind locked devices that require Target personnel assistance. (Photo by Ken Kurson for California Globe)
Target has already taken measures to decrease the catastrophic shrinkage. In July, the retailer cited an “‘alarming rise’ in thefts at its San Francisco stores” and cut its hours. The Mission St. store had been open from 8 am to 10 pm and is now open only from 9 am to 6 pm. One officer told the Globe the new hours inconvenienced hard-working San Franciscans who struggle to buy their diapers and Diet Cokes before 6 pm.



“Their hours, all Targets in San Francisco right now compressed their hours, right? Every store is 9 AM to 6 PM, which pisses everybody off down here because a lot of people get off work at 6 o’clock and they come in and they are like, ‘What? Target is closed?’ … ‘Yeah, Target is closed.’ It is out of control. … They are closing the one on Bush Street. There’s one on Bush and Sansome, right there. They are closing it in a month. Right before Thanksgiving. That one is closing partly because the Financial District isn’t back you know, right.”


But according to this officer, the Mission Street Target will also be closed by the end of the year despite having solid revenue, because they cannot get the shoplifting under control. “In San Francisco, the only reason why they haven’t closed. They want to have it here, right, and this is the biggest one in San Francisco.”

LINK
Posted by LSUwag
Florida man
Member since Jan 2007
18002 posts
Posted on 10/22/21 at 9:16 am to
Good
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
83703 posts
Posted on 10/22/21 at 9:17 am to
quote:

Mayor London Breed challenged that narrative. She attributed the closings to demographic shifts and the Chronicle dutifully reported that “the five stores slated to close had fewer than two recorded shoplifting incidents a month on average since 2018”


That's an asinine statement for ANYONE familiar with retail. Even stores in the best neighborhoods average way more than 2 a month.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
109699 posts
Posted on 10/22/21 at 9:17 am to
Why is it "iconic"?
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
66680 posts
Posted on 10/22/21 at 9:18 am to
At some point, the residents with money have to demand accountability.
Posted by bhtigerfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
32986 posts
Posted on 10/22/21 at 9:19 am to
They voted for this.

Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
85330 posts
Posted on 10/22/21 at 9:20 am to
Progressive government REQUIRES the death of civic virtue. Knowing that, and knowing that THEFT of some kind is actually at the center of Progressivism, we can only hope San Francisco gets more of what it wants.
Posted by Lawyered
The Sip
Member since Oct 2016
37167 posts
Posted on 10/22/21 at 9:20 am to
quote:

They don’t care. There’s no consequences. Literally zero consequences.


There’s the problem.
Posted by Tantal
Member since Sep 2012
19148 posts
Posted on 10/22/21 at 9:21 am to
Getting exactly what they voted for.
Posted by Archer
Murica
Member since Jan 2021
474 posts
Posted on 10/22/21 at 9:23 am to
quote:

Iconic Target Store on Mission St to Close Amid Shoplifting Tidal Wave


Good. Hope that place melts and the value of the homes dip so low that selling is pointless. Voting for the crazy shite gets you the crazy consequences.

Also don't flee, you broke it so fix it. Leave my state alone.
Posted by Wolfmanjack
Member since Jun 2017
1205 posts
Posted on 10/22/21 at 9:24 am to
Fuk em, it needs to get much worse there. I want those fukers to feel the pain.
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
83703 posts
Posted on 10/22/21 at 9:25 am to
Wonder how quick before the city backtracks...


They did with In N Out once they put their foot down to the shenanigans. Reinstituted their permits.
Posted by tigersbb
Member since Oct 2012
12067 posts
Posted on 10/22/21 at 9:35 am to
Wil they build back better?
Posted by BayBengal9
Bay St. Louis, MS
Member since Nov 2019
4171 posts
Posted on 10/22/21 at 9:36 am to
I PRAY that, within a year, wealthy white liberals in San Fran have to drive a two hour round trip to get groceries.

I want their daily lives to be as miserable and inconvenienced as humanly possible.
Posted by MasonTiger
Mason, Ohio
Member since Jan 2005
18464 posts
Posted on 10/22/21 at 9:37 am to
Well, when you vote for this…

Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
93572 posts
Posted on 10/22/21 at 9:40 am to
NorCal

This state needs to split
Posted by Corso
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2020
11789 posts
Posted on 10/22/21 at 9:43 am to
quote:

Mayor London Breed challenged that narrative. She attributed the closings to demographic shifts and the Chronicle dutifully reported that “the five stores slated to close had fewer than two recorded shoplifting incidents a month on average since 2018” (


And her supporters will go right along with that blatant bullshite. The politicians aren't the problem, the voters are
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
16289 posts
Posted on 10/22/21 at 9:43 am to
quote:

This store does between $80,000 to $120,000 in sales every day. And they lose 25 of it [meaning $25,000]. Even if they’re making 25% profit, the stealing takes that down to zero.”


If I was CEO.. I would fire the management that waited this long to close it and tell them to lock the doors tomorrow. That store is hemorrhaging money on fixed and variable cost expenses with no profit.

Close the doors. Frickin Frock those people that need diapers and packaged soy after 6 pm. Drive your arse 20 miles away with your 7 dollar a gallon gas to get it.

They wanted it… they advocated for it… they protested for it… they voted for it…. Let them have it.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
103133 posts
Posted on 10/22/21 at 9:43 am to
They will pay a personal shopper to do that shite for them.

The lower and middle class people? Yeah they better hope they can have it mailed to them and that the packages don’t get stolen.
Posted by xxTIMMYxx
Member since Aug 2019
17562 posts
Posted on 10/22/21 at 9:49 am to
It’s amazing how these people destroy their own communities
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram