- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is there any proof out there that could make a liberal believe the election was stolen?
Posted on 6/4/21 at 10:41 pm to texridder
Posted on 6/4/21 at 10:41 pm to texridder
quote:rcalls me “lazy” then refuses to read links I provided
Either post specific examples or admit you are just FOS.
par for the course
remind me again how you said the three periods in the Ukraine phone call were “proof” that Trump was guilty of obstruction
1
Posted on 6/4/21 at 10:44 pm to The Shed
quote:
Is there any proof out there that could make a liberal believe the election was stolen?
They know it was stolen. They just don't care. They want to live in a communist dystopian society. They want to be ruled over.
Posted on 6/4/21 at 10:50 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
I’m still shocked the military never stepped in as Ron Watkins predicted in his haikus.
You are really annoying, but that was pretty funny.
Posted on 6/4/21 at 10:57 pm to FearlessFreep
quote:
rcalls me “lazy” then refuses to read links I provided
You're a dishonest turd.
Your links were to 2 entire TD threads on the Ukraine topic. Did you think I was going to search through them page by page looking for potential responses to my post?
quote:
remind me again how you said the three periods in the Ukraine phone call were “proof” that Trump was guilty of obstruction
Again, you are FOS. What I said was that the ellipses proved that the transcript that Trump released was not a complete word-for-word record of the phone call which Trump claimed it was, and claimed it exonerated him.
Posted on 6/5/21 at 12:16 am to texridder
quote:which you then claimed was proof that he covered up evidence of his alleged “crime”, without a shred of evidence that anything omitted was criminal
What I said was that the ellipses proved that the transcript that Trump released was not a complete word-for-word record of the phone call which Trump claimed it was
Posted on 6/5/21 at 5:22 am to FearlessFreep
quote:
What I said was that the ellipses proved that the transcript that Trump released was not a complete word-for-word record of the phone call which Trump claimed it was
quote:
which you then claimed was proof that he covered up evidence of his alleged “crime”, without a shred of evidence that anything omitted was criminal
Since it looks like you’ve been studying this, why don’t you post the post where I said that Trump omitting language from the transcript was proof that Trump covered up evidence of his crime.
Posted on 6/5/21 at 8:37 am to texridder
You are going to wake up one day & realize this isn’t left vs right rather top vs bottom.
Hint, you aren’t on top.
Hint, you aren’t on top.
Posted on 6/5/21 at 8:39 am to The Shed
I imagine so, but nothing resembling proof of that has ever been presented to date.
Posted on 6/5/21 at 10:52 am to The Shed
They already believe it was stolen. They just don’t care
Posted on 6/5/21 at 10:57 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
If the US Military and/or the NSA came out publicly and showed their work then I’d believe it was hacked.
bullshite! You probably know it was stolen already and I hope you are smart enough to know it BUT no matter what evidence is shown, the left is absolutely ensconced in the falsehood that is didn’t happen and they have drug out the old Nazi terminology of “the big lie” to drive it home for them. They will NEVER admit to the election having been stolen, even if they know better. I am pretty certain you are included in that!
Posted on 6/5/21 at 11:09 am to Roger Klarvin
quote:
I imagine so, but nothing resembling proof of that has ever been presented to date.
If, on the other hand, they were to utilize the same standards of proof they adopted in Trump's two impeachment trials, this thing would be in the bag, a foregone conclusion. But they not so surprisingly swing alll the way to the other end of the spectrum when convenient.
Posted on 6/5/21 at 11:10 am to The Shed
quote:
Is there any proof out there that could make a liberal believe the election was stolen?
They know. All of the other convulsions the left are doing when you state the facts is simply an attempt to deflect. Let them have their seizures. All it does is harm them anyway. Who are we to stop their self loathing?
Posted on 6/5/21 at 11:12 am to texridder
quote:
texridder
It makes me happy that every single minute of your life is consumed with TDS. Maybe when they reopen the nuthouses, you can check yourself in.
TRUMP is YOUR PRESIDENT.
Posted on 6/5/21 at 11:22 am to jbond
quote:
None ever emerged to make a judge believe it...
Not yet...
Posted on 6/5/21 at 11:32 am to dgnx6
quote:
There is proof of massive fraud. Just not proof of who those votes went to.
no proof of who the votes went to?
it's obvious the votes went to Biden.
in 2016 the victory went to Trump and the liberals lied and fabricated stories that Trump stole the election.
the media has not investigated the claims of fraudulent behavior but has done just the opposite; downplaying the accusations and covering up for the leftist and RINOS in Washington.
Posted on 6/5/21 at 11:46 am to The Shed
The 2020 election ended the moment the Supreme Court weighed in, it’s a done deal.
So the real question is: what laws are needed to get people to trust the political process again?
And to be clear trust is defined as your side loses and you accept the result was fair.
So the real question is: what laws are needed to get people to trust the political process again?
And to be clear trust is defined as your side loses and you accept the result was fair.
Posted on 6/5/21 at 11:49 am to texridder
quote:Posted by texridder on 10/14/19 at 10:15 pm:
why don’t you post the post where I said that Trump omitting language from the transcript was proof that Trump covered up evidence of his crime.
quote:Posted by texridder on 10/16/19 at 3:32 am:
Something more had to be in the ellipses. There's no way that transcription contained all of the call. And what was left out ain't good for Trump.
quote:
The full transcript is not good for Trump or it wouldn't have caused the reaction that it did to those who talked about it to the Whistleblower.
Posted on 6/5/21 at 11:55 am to cardboardboxer
First things first: seeing as how a significant factor in the distrust and discord is the assertion by the Right that the U.S. Constitution is quite clear on the subject of state legislatures having exclusive authority to dictate the manner and method of its electoral process, the Democrats at the national level should cease and desist any further efforts to impose federal voting mandates that are in direct contravention of the aforementioned Constitutional provisions. That they're so blatantly dismissive of that clear provision within the Constitution immediately signals bad faith to the Right.
Posted on 6/5/21 at 1:26 pm to davyjones
There won’t be a voting rights bill. It’s just something on the table to cut when it’s time to add more into the budget and moderate Democrats need to be placated.
Posted on 6/5/21 at 1:32 pm to cardboardboxer
Totally agree. My point just being that in terms of the process of regaining the trust of the majority of populace as far as election results go, as long as that bill is on the table for whatever reason, there is no good faith upon which to even start to build.
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News