- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Credible Texans Reporter on Watson Trade Cost
Posted on 1/31/21 at 11:41 am
Posted on 1/31/21 at 11:41 am
LINK
Thought y’all might wanna know...
quote:
John McClain
@McClain_on_NFL
The Rams-Lions trade will have nothing to do with a Watson trade if the Texans do it. They'll want 2 ones, 2 twos and 2 young defensive starters, at the least. Watson, 25, under contract, great QB, team leader, beloved by fans, pillar of the community. Start with the Jets.
Thought y’all might wanna know...
This post was edited on 1/31/21 at 11:42 am
Posted on 1/31/21 at 11:42 am to Rand AlThor
quote:
They'll want 2 ones, 2 twos and 2 young defensive starters, at the least.
Considering Watson has demanded a trade, they won't get as much as they want. This is a ridiculous ask
Posted on 1/31/21 at 11:53 am to Rand AlThor
Not worth it at all. Saints just need to sign a cheap FA or Winston, hopefully draft well this year, and manage their cap situation. Will probably lose a lot of key players like Jack Rabbit, Kwon, potentially Marcus Williams, etc. But can't fork all of that for just Watson. Too risky.
Posted on 1/31/21 at 11:53 am to MrJimBeam
I’d gladly trade them 2 firsts, 2 thirds, marshon and Davenport.
Posted on 1/31/21 at 11:54 am to Bert Macklin FBI
quote:
I’d gladly trade them 2 firsts, 2 thirds, marshon and Davenport.
Lets get this done this week.
Posted on 1/31/21 at 11:55 am to Rand AlThor
2 1's 2 2's davenport and Anzalone. Done
Posted on 1/31/21 at 11:56 am to MrJimBeam
quote:
Considering Watson has demanded a trade, they won't get as much as they want. This is a ridiculous ask
Not ridiculous at all after seeing what Stafford just went for, and teams knowing he wouldn’t be back in Detroit
Posted on 1/31/21 at 11:57 am to Bert Macklin FBI
quote:
I’d gladly trade them 2 firsts, 2 thirds, marshon and Davenport
Not necessarily disagreeing with you, but how do you replace the really good past draft classes that are set to be paid in the next two years?
Trade Davenport....we are losing Hendrickson this year. Proabably.
Trade Lattimore...which corners are left on the team??
Posted on 1/31/21 at 11:57 am to Rand AlThor
quote:
2 ones, 2 twos and 2 young defensive starters, at the least

Posted on 1/31/21 at 11:59 am to Rand AlThor
They can have mike Thomas and be happy
Posted on 1/31/21 at 12:07 pm to WB504
quote:
Not ridiculous at all after seeing what Stafford just went for, and teams knowing he wouldn’t be back in Detroit
Detroit got more for Stafford because they had to take on Goffs terrible contract
Posted on 1/31/21 at 12:17 pm to GeauxBoi
quote:
Detroit got more for Stafford because they had to take on Goffs terrible contract
And Houston doesnt have to trade Watson. He is signed long term
Houston obviously doesnt care about their rep based on these last few years. They can demand just about anything
Posted on 1/31/21 at 12:30 pm to Sauce Castieaux
This board severely underestimates the value of a true franchise QB. Stafford is a franchise QB at the end of his prime and he fetched two firsts and a borderline franchise QB. You literally cannot win championships in the NFL without a franchise guy.
Posted on 1/31/21 at 1:04 pm to Rand AlThor
I’d do that deal. He’s worth that price. You can rebound from those lost assets in 2 years at most but you’d have a top 5 QB who is also a genuinely good person off the field as the face of your franchise for a decade. Young generational QBs just don’t come on the open market. Maybe they take 2 1sts, 2 3rds and then do sign and trades with Marcus Williams and Sheldon Rankins.
Posted on 1/31/21 at 1:12 pm to saints5021
quote:
This board severely underestimates the value of a true franchise QB. Stafford is a franchise QB at the end of his prime and he fetched two firsts and a borderline franchise QB. You literally cannot win championships in the NFL without a franchise guy.
Yes
And the Saints shite the bed with the bullshite that Taysom Hill would be our next franchise QB
Green Bay is criticized, but they have the exact correct approach.
They drafted Rogers when they had
Farve.
You should always be looking for your next QB. You can’t win in the NFL without one.
Bilichik wanted to trade Brady and was stopped by the owner
49ers traded Montana.
You don’t wait till your franchise QB is in a wheel chair to make a move.
Posted on 1/31/21 at 1:12 pm to Bert Macklin FBI
Send me watt & Watson if I’m giving you all that
Posted on 1/31/21 at 1:23 pm to MrJimBeam
quote:
Considering Watson has demanded a trade, they won't get as much as they want. This is a ridiculous ask
And the Texans hold ALL of the leverage. Watson still has 3 years let on his deal. This is basically a signal to other teams that they will need to come with a HUGE offer to get Watson. Otherwise, he can retire or hold out for multiple years (which he won’t do)
Posted on 1/31/21 at 11:47 pm to Alt26
2-1’s and Davenport and Peat
That totals I think 10 of our 1’s or is it 11????
That totals I think 10 of our 1’s or is it 11????
Posted on 2/1/21 at 12:01 am to arseinclarse
...
2 ones, 2 twos and 2 young defensive starters, at the least
2 ones, 2 twos and 2 young defensive starters, at the least
Posted on 2/1/21 at 5:43 am to WB504
Some of that cost was the lions taking on goff and that contract.
I think stafford alone would've been a 1st and a 4th or 5th
I think stafford alone would've been a 1st and a 4th or 5th
Popular
Back to top


27











