- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The "White Supremacy" question was a clever trap Trump side stepped.
Posted on 9/30/20 at 9:30 am
Posted on 9/30/20 at 9:30 am
Because in case you frickers forget, most sane people think White Supremist are KKK or Neo Nazi. BUT to people like Biden, The Democrats, Chris Wallace and the majority of the media. WHITE Supremacy is anyone that is the following:
-Voted for Trump
-Non-Whites(Like me) Who Voted for Trump
-Don't Support Black Lives Matters
-Don't Support Antifa
-Don't Support Defunding Police
-Don't Support immunity for Illegal Immigrations
-Support the Wall
-Anyone that Vote Republican's
And many other, THAT is White Supremecy right now to the Left and Media. A better question for Chris Wallace to ask is ...
"Mr President, would you denounce the KKK?" ANd Trump would have done it in a heart beat.
But White Supremacy? After the narrative the LEft painted on what it is and who it included now?
-Voted for Trump
-Non-Whites(Like me) Who Voted for Trump
-Don't Support Black Lives Matters
-Don't Support Antifa
-Don't Support Defunding Police
-Don't Support immunity for Illegal Immigrations
-Support the Wall
-Anyone that Vote Republican's
And many other, THAT is White Supremecy right now to the Left and Media. A better question for Chris Wallace to ask is ...
"Mr President, would you denounce the KKK?" ANd Trump would have done it in a heart beat.
But White Supremacy? After the narrative the LEft painted on what it is and who it included now?
11
Posted on 9/30/20 at 9:31 am to Duzz
if Trump's supporters understand this and accept it, then what did Trump have to lose by giving a simple, proper answer?
you think Trump would lose support for this?
you think Trump would lose support for this?
Posted on 9/30/20 at 9:32 am to Duzz
Side stepping white supremacy. True genius. Sorry most people don’t on your idiotic wavelength.
Posted on 9/30/20 at 9:32 am to Duzz
Excellent insight. Have my upvote! 
Posted on 9/30/20 at 9:33 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
you think Trump would lose support for this?
This poster has to be a special type of idiot. Easily the stupidest analysis I’ve heard yet from the debate.
Posted on 9/30/20 at 9:33 am to Duzz
It was a total gotcha question by Wallace but it was still a softball and Trump gave a horrible answer like he did much of the night.
Posted on 9/30/20 at 9:34 am to Duzz
quote:
The "White Supremacy" question was a clever trap Trump side stepped.
no it was a softball that trump should have used to end that narrative and denounce all supremacy and terror groups including the KKK, BLM, and Antifa. It was a softball question that he could have used to end a narrative and could have flipped and asked Biden to denounce BLM and Antifa and other communist groups.
He fricked it up
Posted on 9/30/20 at 9:35 am to OMLandshark
Trumpkins love to say they're the ones who have the Trump decoder ring to understand the true genius of all of his gaffes, but they also are scared to have him condemn white supremacists publicly, because it may include people they (and I, mind you) don't consider white supremacists? And that will anger that group? Or that Trump-supporting group doesn't have the decoder ring to understand what he's really doing? And it will make them vote for Biden?
it makes no sense
it makes no sense
Posted on 9/30/20 at 9:36 am to SlowFlowPro
I think the issue with Trumps response was that he was too focused on deflectIng Responsibility for the recent violence back to the left (where it should be) and he didn’t pay close enough attention to the “white supremacy” part of the question, which is the part people are latching on to.
Posted on 9/30/20 at 9:37 am to Duzz
Jesus, he stepped right into it.
Why doesn't he simply say I denounce white power groups and discrimination of every kind.
However the fake news and certain liberals often unfairly lump groups that support free speech in with them for the insane belief that if you believe in the free exchange of ideas you must be racist.
I also support purple protecting their families, their homes and their businesses against Mostly peaceful protests. If you've ever been in a violent encounter, mostly peaceful is Stupid way of saying violent.
So democratic cities and states protect your citizens or they will have no choice but to defend themselves.
Bam. You just denounced white power groups while getting your point across.
Why doesn't he simply say I denounce white power groups and discrimination of every kind.
However the fake news and certain liberals often unfairly lump groups that support free speech in with them for the insane belief that if you believe in the free exchange of ideas you must be racist.
I also support purple protecting their families, their homes and their businesses against Mostly peaceful protests. If you've ever been in a violent encounter, mostly peaceful is Stupid way of saying violent.
So democratic cities and states protect your citizens or they will have no choice but to defend themselves.
Bam. You just denounced white power groups while getting your point across.
Posted on 9/30/20 at 9:38 am to SlowFlowPro
if
I really don’t think he side stepped it. When you read the transcript, it answers immediately
quote:
Trump's supporters understand this and accept it, then what did Trump have to lose by giving a simple, proper answer?
you think Trump would lose support for this?
I really don’t think he side stepped it. When you read the transcript, it answers immediately
Posted on 9/30/20 at 9:38 am to Robin Masters
quote:
I think the issue with Trumps response was that he was too focused on deflectIng Responsibility for the recent violence back to the left (where it should be) and he didn’t pay close enough attention to the “white supremacy” part of the question, which is the part people are latching on to.
He's fumbled this like 50 times I have no idea why he wasn't prepared to answer this simple question and give such a sloppy reponse.
Posted on 9/30/20 at 9:38 am to Antonio Moss
quote:
I really don’t think he side stepped it. When you read the transcript, it answers immediately
You are talking to a simpleton that swallows what he is fed
Posted on 9/30/20 at 9:39 am to Antonio Moss
quote:
I really don’t think he side stepped it. When you read the transcript, it answers immediately
I think he was asking for clarification but did it in a way that seemed to want to avoid answering directly.
But nuance wasn't needed. Just get a soundbite denouncing them. What is the real cost?
Posted on 9/30/20 at 9:39 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
if Trump's supporters understand this and accept it, then what did Trump have to lose by giving a simple, proper answer?
You must be slow. Trump has done this many times on camera. He did this after the charlottesville thing, many times. Maybe you don't remember. Maybe then, you could tell me that exactly what does white supremacists have anything to do with the riots in the liberals wastelands of America? You can't. Because they have no bearing on the matter. Wallace pivoted from ANTIFA riots, to charlottesville as a way to try and make Trump forget about Portlandistan. You know this. If not, then you are retarded.
So "why didn't he just condemn them", because he already did. Wallace's entire purpose was to plant that seed of racism in stupid people's head. You fell for the bait.
Posted on 9/30/20 at 9:41 am to BugAC
quote:
ou must be slow. Trump has done this many times on camera.
We are talking about last night. He didn't do this last night.
quote:
Maybe you don't remember. Maybe then, you could tell me that exactly what does white supremacists have anything to do with the riots in the liberals wastelands of America? You can't. Because they have no bearing on the matter. Wallace pivoted from ANTIFA riots, to charlottesville as a way to try and make Trump forget about Portlandistan. You know this. If not, then you are retarded.
This is all, literally, irrelevant.
quote:
So "why didn't he just condemn them", because he already did.
What is the cost of doing it again?
quote:
Wallace's entire purpose was to plant that seed of racism in stupid people's head.
And Trump could have clearly denounced it. Instead, he allowed that seed to grow and explode today.
Posted on 9/30/20 at 9:41 am to DallasTiger11
quote:
It was a total gotcha question by Wallace but it was still a softball and Trump gave a horrible answer like he did much of the night.
Is it really a "softball" when you listen to the question and realize Wallace was saying, "white supremacy...errr, militias," with Biden throwing in "...errr, Proud Boys" while Trump was trying to answer?
It was nothing but a gotcha all around and Biden was actually remarkably ready to pounce.
Posted on 9/30/20 at 9:41 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Just get a soundbite denouncing them. What is the real cost?
Trump literally asked Wallace, "who do you want me to denounce? Name someone and i'll denounce them" and Biden piped in "proud boys" and Wallace echoed "Yeah, thanks Joe, the proud boys". The problem is, the Proud boys are not a white supremacist group. So again, surely you aren't so stupid as to think Wallace was being intellectually honest, were you?
Posted on 9/30/20 at 9:42 am to Duzz
.note that the same statement of condemnation included militia, who are not inherently racist nor white supremacist, as well as a reference to Kenosha.
By offering a blanket condemnation to the statement as a whole, without carving out his position on militia, who right or wrong, are attempting to project a sense of law and order in lawless areas or justifying actions taken by civilians to protect life and liberty in Kenosha, he provides the sound-bite to dems to invalidate militias and self-defense during "peaceful protests".
By offering a blanket condemnation to the statement as a whole, without carving out his position on militia, who right or wrong, are attempting to project a sense of law and order in lawless areas or justifying actions taken by civilians to protect life and liberty in Kenosha, he provides the sound-bite to dems to invalidate militias and self-defense during "peaceful protests".
Posted on 9/30/20 at 9:43 am to BugAC
He should have taken the broad question and answered with a precise response like, “I condemn the KKK and labeled them a terrorist group, unlike VP Biden. I also don’t associate with KKK terrorists like a Robert Byrd, unlike my running mate.”
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News