- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Why are so many people on here saying it is “bad politics” to go after social media?
Posted on 5/29/20 at 11:09 am
Posted on 5/29/20 at 11:09 am
There’s a reason biden and other dems pledged to revoke 230 as well, it polls well, whether you like it or not
If something polls 2:1 in support, why would it be politically harmful?
I am not arguing it is good policy, but when Americans by wide margins support social media regulation, it makes it tough to believe it is bad politics
If something polls 2:1 in support, why would it be politically harmful?
I am not arguing it is good policy, but when Americans by wide margins support social media regulation, it makes it tough to believe it is bad politics
Posted on 5/29/20 at 11:10 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
I am not arguing it is good policy
I am.
Posted on 5/29/20 at 11:12 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
There’s a reason biden and other dems pledged to revoke 230 as well, it polls well, whether you like it or not
I actually DISAGREE with revoking 230.
230 is absolutely fine.
It's treating things that clearly aren't covered under 230 as if they are that's the problem
230 tells us what a platform is. Only lawyers torture the language enough to claim it doesn't.
I like protecting platforms. They SHOULD be protected.
Behave like a platform. Be protected
This post was edited on 5/29/20 at 11:13 am
Posted on 5/29/20 at 11:12 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
It is good policy.
How can an entity claim to be a platform for free speech while simultaneously having the ability to pick and choose what is displayed and how it's displayed.
There is no argument that can be made for those 2 ideas to be blended.
How can an entity claim to be a platform for free speech while simultaneously having the ability to pick and choose what is displayed and how it's displayed.
There is no argument that can be made for those 2 ideas to be blended.
Posted on 5/29/20 at 11:13 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Social media IS bad politics.
Posted on 5/29/20 at 11:15 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Because a lot people on the right have allowed themselves to be so browbeaten by the left for their entire lives that even after four years of TRUMP they still don't think they should fight back.
Others are just left wingers larping and concern trolling.
Others are just left wingers larping and concern trolling.
Posted on 5/29/20 at 11:17 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
I am not arguing it is good policy, but when Americans by wide margins support social media regulation, it makes it tough to believe it is bad politics
Probably because of the messenger.
Posted on 5/29/20 at 11:21 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
I would just like to point out that the IRS targeted tea party movements and nothing happened of consequence except Lois Lerner got up on the cross about it. The targeting of conservatives has been systematic over the last 12 years. Big Tech is another front of that assault. Is it any wonder that the media mob is screaming about it. Perhaps the better question is what conservative laments ending the targeting of their ideology? The answer is, not a good one.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News