- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
![locked post](https://www.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/lock.gif)
Judge Sullivan asks judge to look at whether Flynn could be held in criminal contempt
Posted on 5/13/20 at 6:09 pm
Posted on 5/13/20 at 6:09 pm
I’m so lost here? How is this possible?
![](https://i.imgur.com/FWscLMb.png)
quote:
Judge SULLIVAN has appointed retired judge to argue against the government's motion to dismiss the charge against Flynn
![](https://i.imgur.com/FWscLMb.png)
Posted on 5/13/20 at 6:11 pm to TOKEN
He is a left wing shill judge. What is difficult to understand?
He is flailing about like a retard
He is flailing about like a retard
Posted on 5/13/20 at 6:11 pm to TOKEN
quote:
How is this possible?
The judge doesn't have to grant the Motion to Dismiss the Charges against Flynn
Posted on 5/13/20 at 6:12 pm to TOKEN
The wall on his office must stink considering the sheer volume of shite he is flinging at it in an attempt to prolong the case.
Posted on 5/13/20 at 6:14 pm to TOKEN
For FRICKS SAKE. This is a national disgrace
I have ZERO faith in our Justice system anymore. Impeach the fricking judge immediately
I have ZERO faith in our Justice system anymore. Impeach the fricking judge immediately
Posted on 5/13/20 at 6:14 pm to TOKEN
Sullivan is going to sentence Flynn. Book it. It will get thrown out on appeal, but it will show his handlers he's a loyal dog.
Posted on 5/13/20 at 6:15 pm to TOKEN
Yeah, I don’t know shite about this whole process but from the bits and pieces I’ve put together, it seems like Sullivan wants to be a martyr or something.
Posted on 5/13/20 at 6:16 pm to TOKEN
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/26/23 at 9:39 am
Posted on 5/13/20 at 6:16 pm to TOKEN
Needs to hang with the rest of them
Posted on 5/13/20 at 6:17 pm to TOKEN
So even if Flynn “lied” the the FBI.
Isn’t the whole interview tainted at this point and it all should be thrown out as a Fruit of the Poisonous Tree?
Isn’t the whole interview tainted at this point and it all should be thrown out as a Fruit of the Poisonous Tree?
Posted on 5/13/20 at 6:18 pm to TOKEN
This is fertile ground for an appeal but the #1 goal is to delay. It keeps Flynn out of returning to aid Trump. It stalls for time in case Trump loses reelection. It potentially makes Trump issue a pardon which is bad politically.
Sullivan has to keep this up as long as possible.
Sullivan has to keep this up as long as possible.
Posted on 5/13/20 at 6:18 pm to TOKEN
Loserman reads this on Poliboard.
Loserman weighs how many years he has left to live.
Loserman decides we are fricked because Loserman isn't willing to give up his last 10 or so years of life, to correct the Judges error.
Loserman weighs how many years he has left to live.
Loserman decides we are fricked because Loserman isn't willing to give up his last 10 or so years of life, to correct the Judges error.
Posted on 5/13/20 at 6:19 pm to TOKEN
I fail to understand why anyone needs to argue against the government's motion to dismiss. The case was United States of America vs Michael T. Flynn and the government dropped the God damn case. It's not Some Retired frick or Emmett Sullivan vs Muchael T Flynn.
Posted on 5/13/20 at 6:20 pm to TOKEN
Sully boy knows he looks like the fool he is for giving Flynn that tongue lashing. Michael Flynn has done more for this country than this pos ever has or will.
Posted on 5/13/20 at 6:29 pm to TOKEN
this is insane
he's having another judge argue the government's position
he's allowing 3rd parties to file amicus briefs
for an unopposed motion? after a long-running discovery/Brady dispute?
he's having another judge argue the government's position
he's allowing 3rd parties to file amicus briefs
for an unopposed motion? after a long-running discovery/Brady dispute?
Posted on 5/13/20 at 6:31 pm to TOKEN
Sounds like the Radical Lefties have the goods on the judge... tapes, videos, emails, texts, sworn statements, eye witnesses - the whole nine yards.
He's tap-dancing like a man with his balls in a vise.
He's tap-dancing like a man with his balls in a vise.
Posted on 5/13/20 at 6:32 pm to TOKEN
We love our affirmative action judges don't we?
If he did somehow get impeached he could run for the House and be there for 20 years just like Alcee Hastings.
If he did somehow get impeached he could run for the House and be there for 20 years just like Alcee Hastings.
Posted on 5/13/20 at 6:49 pm to TOKEN
Mullah Hussein Judge. Enough said
Posted on 5/13/20 at 6:59 pm to TOKEN
Sullivan can do this but he’s just playing political games here, potentially, if he digs in and refuses to grant motion to dismiss.
He has two moves here:
Grant motion to dismiss; at that point it’s over.
Or
Refuse to grant motion to dismiss; at that point I would be absolutely floored if he wasn’t overruled on appeal. It would be a stunning exercise of deep state power commitment to uphold such a ruling.
He has two moves here:
Grant motion to dismiss; at that point it’s over.
Or
Refuse to grant motion to dismiss; at that point I would be absolutely floored if he wasn’t overruled on appeal. It would be a stunning exercise of deep state power commitment to uphold such a ruling.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)