- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Oh now the media has found a “game changer” - PLASMA
Posted on 4/8/20 at 3:40 pm
Posted on 4/8/20 at 3:40 pm
Per NBC. Plasma treatment being tested in New York may be coronavirus 'game changer'
LINK
Why with few studies, no controlled testing results and only anecdotal evidence is this a “game changer”??
Because Trump didn’t originally recommend it.
The hypocrisy of the media is insane.
LINK
Why with few studies, no controlled testing results and only anecdotal evidence is this a “game changer”??
Because Trump didn’t originally recommend it.
The hypocrisy of the media is insane.
This post was edited on 4/8/20 at 3:45 pm
15
Posted on 4/8/20 at 3:45 pm to oilattorney4lsu
The procedure has been around for over 100 years, longer the HCQ
Posted on 4/8/20 at 3:47 pm to oilattorney4lsu
They have actually talked about this in several of the press conferences. It is not new and been in the news for a few weeks.
Posted on 4/8/20 at 3:49 pm to oilattorney4lsu
quote:
Because Trump didn’t originally recommend it.
Posted on 4/8/20 at 3:49 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
The procedure has been around for over 100 years, longer the HCQ
And it's spelled differently too! Totally different situation!
This post was edited on 4/8/20 at 3:50 pm
Posted on 4/8/20 at 3:50 pm to oilattorney4lsu
I think Houston Methodist lead the charge on this a few weeks ago.
Posted on 4/8/20 at 3:54 pm to oilattorney4lsu
quote:
Oh now the media has found a “game changer” - PLASMA
Quick
One of you tRumpsters go eat a tv.
Posted on 4/8/20 at 4:08 pm to oilattorney4lsu
Idk man seems like anecdotal evidence. I’m gonna need to see some trials before we start putting blood inside each other.
Posted on 4/8/20 at 4:15 pm to offshoreangler
Yeah. The Texas virologist on Joe Rogan was promoting this.
Posted on 4/8/20 at 4:16 pm to oilattorney4lsu
It’s too expensive, and it’s not practical as a front line treatment.
Our best option is repurposing existing drugs to treat the virus. It’s the fastest, cheapest, and most practical approach.
Our best option is repurposing existing drugs to treat the virus. It’s the fastest, cheapest, and most practical approach.
This post was edited on 4/8/20 at 4:17 pm
Posted on 4/8/20 at 4:20 pm to Lima Whiskey
ANECDOTAL
Posted on 4/8/20 at 4:43 pm to oilattorney4lsu
we need to instantly outlaw any use of it until we have 18-24 months of testing since its only anecdotal evidence that it works
seriously though, the plasma BS is only for those on ventilators too sick to use HCQ
seriously though, the plasma BS is only for those on ventilators too sick to use HCQ
Posted on 4/8/20 at 4:46 pm to oilattorney4lsu
quote:
Plasma treatment being tested in New York may be coronavirus 'game changer'
Does anyone know if the Trump Family Trust owns any stock in blood?
Posted on 4/8/20 at 4:52 pm to oilattorney4lsu
Key to this is that you have to have sick people who get well to get the antibodies. So you have to have people get sick.
Secondly there is at least some data that says many of the people who were sick have fewer antibodies than expected in their plasma s for them it may not work.
This is not a new idea
Secondly there is at least some data that says many of the people who were sick have fewer antibodies than expected in their plasma s for them it may not work.
This is not a new idea
Posted on 4/8/20 at 4:52 pm to keakar
quote:
the plasma BS is only for those on ventilators too sick to use HCQ
First I wouldn't call it bs. I've seen a couple of small studies showing some good and others not so much.
Way I would handle it is first line hcq. If annoyed to hospital, plasma.
If ards, if probably go il6 drug.
But that is just me talking of the top of my head with literally no evidence to support it but hope and prayer.
Posted on 4/8/20 at 10:06 pm to thetempleowl
quote:
First I wouldn't call it bs
well what i meant was the way it was being portrayed compared to HCQ when its a next level medicine where its gone beyond the point HCQ works
its not going to replace the HCQ, its just for the next stage if you need it so the ones dying in ventilators from co2 the blood thing takes care of the co2 shite
Posted on 4/8/20 at 10:31 pm to oilattorney4lsu
obviously because
Plasma Transfusion = Zero risks .., nada ..
Plasma Transfusion = Zero risks .., nada ..
Posted on 4/8/20 at 10:39 pm to oilattorney4lsu
Used to sell plasma in college for beer money.
Posted on 4/8/20 at 10:44 pm to oilattorney4lsu
quote:
Why with few studies, no controlled testing results and only anecdotal evidence is this a “game changer”??
this changed the game in 1890. you have to draw plasma for antibodies from people who have recovered from the infection. its called passive immunization. its not being blasted because of obvious limitations. Theres only so many people who have recovered, and they only have so much plasma, and they have to be willing to donate the plasma.
Posted on 4/8/20 at 10:49 pm to oilattorney4lsu
so the media is getting behind bleeding people now?
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News