- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: In case anyone missed the Will Wade audio last night
Posted on 4/1/20 at 2:48 pm to Lester Earl
Posted on 4/1/20 at 2:48 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
Coach, when you finally did meet with LSU, the trial was still going on.
Do you have a better excuse?
“See my previous statement”. Jesus Christ you’re dense if you think you actually made a semi good response here
quote:
I know what you did, can you please explain why you would give up money yet still attempt to maintain innocence?
Serious question, are you retarded? You really proved the case now!
This post was edited on 4/1/20 at 2:50 pm
2
Posted on 4/1/20 at 2:51 pm to BreesyInBigEasy
LesterEarl is just some loser
His words
His words
Posted on 4/1/20 at 2:51 pm to BreesyInBigEasy
You do realize that Will Wade talking with LSU coincided with a change in counsel, not with the end of the trial, right?
and no one says retard anymore. Be better than that
and no one says retard anymore. Be better than that
Posted on 4/1/20 at 2:55 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
You do realize that Will Wade talking with LSU coincided with a change in counsel, not with the end of the trial, right?
Right so he was still following the advise of his legal counsel....you really got him
quote:
and no one says retard anymore. Be better than that
The view you have of yourself is hilarious.
Posted on 4/1/20 at 2:57 pm to PhillyFan1994
quote:
Dawkins talking about how he looked at coaches who paid players as "good people" and ones who did not as "not good people."
So, he turns around and shits on all these good people when he’s sentenced?
Bitch please...
Posted on 4/1/20 at 3:01 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
Coach, when you finally did meet with LSU, the trial was still going on.
Do you have a better excuse?
I changed legal counsel to one who did not have as stringent of views on discussing topics (unrelated to the trial) with my employer. Not an excuse, but an explanation of the circumstances.
quote:
I know what you did, can you please explain why you would give up money yet still attempt to maintain innocence?
I love my job and employer, and it was time for a resolution
Posted on 4/1/20 at 3:04 pm to BreesyInBigEasy
quote:
Right so he was still following the advise of his legal counsel....you really got him
So you think a clean man would sit out at all, much less 37 days while his team made a postseason run?
I’m trying to understand your point past “he was told to” or “there was a trial going on”
Posted on 4/1/20 at 3:13 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
So you think a clean man would sit out at all, much less 37 days while his team made a postseason run?
First, i don’t think it proves anything one way or another because I’m not a fool.
I think a smart man follows his legal counsel. He clearly wasn’t happy about how that played out, so he retained new legal counsel better able to handle the situation with an expertise in dealing with the NCaa
So by your own logic, his actions of retaining new counsel proves his innocence?
quote:
I’m trying to understand your point past “he was told to” or “there was a trial going on”
He followed the advise of his legal counsel like an intelligent person does with millions on the line. This really isn’t hard Lester
This post was edited on 4/1/20 at 3:16 pm
Posted on 4/1/20 at 3:20 pm to BreesyInBigEasy
So do you, or don’t you think his legal advice was reflective of the information Will Wade provided
I’m not sure you understand how this works. But this is definitely one of the funnier attempts to relieve Will Wade of any responsibility
Eta: funny prob isn’t the right word. Rather just really really basic.
I’m not sure you understand how this works. But this is definitely one of the funnier attempts to relieve Will Wade of any responsibility
Eta: funny prob isn’t the right word. Rather just really really basic.
This post was edited on 4/1/20 at 3:21 pm
Posted on 4/1/20 at 3:22 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
So do you, or don’t you think his legal advice was reflective of the information Will Wade provided
I think his original was viewing it from a criminal/trial perspective, while the new one specialized in the NCAA. Different viewpoints. I also believe he retained the original representation too
quote:
I’m not sure you understand how this works
Lolz
quote:
But this is definitely one of the funnier attempts to relieve Will Wade of any responsibility
Where did I do that? You asked incredibly easy to answer “why” questions that have very “basic” answers for any rational professional
But tell me more about how it proves guilt
This post was edited on 4/1/20 at 3:24 pm
Posted on 4/1/20 at 3:23 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
I’ve made deals for as good a players as him that were (expletive) a lot simpler than this.”
This was the worst part to me. And I agree with OP, this sounded worse than I thought. Not worth firing over, but it could certainly lead to things being uncovered to. I love Wade, but will trust Woodward to handle this in LSU’s best interest.
Posted on 4/1/20 at 4:27 pm to Hot Carl
Is it possible Wade is just telling Dawkins what he wants to hear so he can have future access to a person that is connected to a plethora of hs recruits?
Posted on 4/1/20 at 4:33 pm to PhillyFan1994
quote:
In case anyone missed the Will Wade audio last night
quote:
Really nothing we didnt already know.
Pretty much everyone predicted this, the LSU/Wade stuff was low-hanging fruit during this deal and all we got was the wiretap as the NCAA cleared Smart for competition and LSU ultimately cleared Wade, wasn't going to be anything earth-shattering
Posted on 4/1/20 at 4:41 pm to tigahlovah
quote:
Is it possible Wade is just telling Dawkins what he wants to hear so he can have future access to a person that is connected to a plethora of hs recruits?
Possible? Yes. Affords him plausible deniability? Most likely. True? Doubtful.
Posted on 4/1/20 at 5:52 pm to Hot Carl
It only has to be plausible to the extent it creates enough doubt about Wade's guilt, when combined with the apparent lack of a money trail.
Posted on 4/2/20 at 2:26 am to TigerBR1111
quote:
You mean like honor amongst thieves and all that. I’m not downing WW but let’s not give Dawkins undue respect. He’s just a common sleaze bag.
Exactly what I mean. A sleazy bag knows another instantly
Posted on 4/2/20 at 7:00 am to the LSUSaint
Sheesh. Lester got owned in this thread.
Posted on 4/2/20 at 8:55 am to the LSUSaint
quote:
A sleazy bag knows another instantly
I never trust the opinion or judgment of a sleazebag. They are just liars and can’t be trusted in any way.
Posted on 4/2/20 at 9:36 am to PhillyFan1994
Obviously, there's a question of entrapment. Not sure there's any other way to explain this.
Posted on 4/2/20 at 2:52 pm to unctiger4
quote:
“we can compensate him better than the rookie minimum.”
Healthcare. You are a fool to only see one interpretation.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News