- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The positive side of the CFB Playoff Fiasco
Posted on 11/13/19 at 12:06 pm
Posted on 11/13/19 at 12:06 pm
Not saying I like what the committee has done by any means. But at least there are more good teams this year. I remember the last few years, there were very few quality teams that had any argument that they should be included in the playoffs. Last year, we automatically knew that there were only two teams that matter and everything else is a waste.
This year, there are so many teams that look so good and that could claim for a playoff spot. It’s going to make the end of the season all that more intense.
This year, there are so many teams that look so good and that could claim for a playoff spot. It’s going to make the end of the season all that more intense.
6
Posted on 11/13/19 at 12:08 pm to athenslife101
you're mad at the future? weird melt dude. at least wait until actual controversy exists. not the manufactured drama
Posted on 11/13/19 at 12:10 pm to athenslife101
What CFB playoff fiasco are you referring to?
This post was edited on 11/13/19 at 12:11 pm
Posted on 11/13/19 at 12:20 pm to athenslife101
There is no fiasco
Posted on 11/13/19 at 12:25 pm to athenslife101
The Playoff has had 3 “controversial” entrants in its short history. Those teams went 4-1 and won 2 National Championships
2014: Ohio State
2016: Ohio State
2017: Bama
Other than 2014 TCU/Baylor, which was a really tough decision anyway, what is the most debatable Final Decision that the Committee has ever made?
2014: Ohio State
2016: Ohio State
2017: Bama
Other than 2014 TCU/Baylor, which was a really tough decision anyway, what is the most debatable Final Decision that the Committee has ever made?
This post was edited on 11/13/19 at 12:33 pm
Posted on 11/13/19 at 1:26 pm to athenslife101
I don’t subscribe to the “4 best teams” bullshite because there are many 2 and 3-loss teams annually who are stellar, results on the field and in the big games have to matter bc they reflect an ability to thrive under pressure against big-time teams and why the college football regular season means more than other sport. When people use the “4 best teams” argument, they basically just spit on the importance of the regular season and merits of winning their conference, it’s completely antithetical to basic notions of competitive sports.
Posted on 11/13/19 at 4:10 pm to athenslife101
quote:There are only 2 teams who have looked really good. OSU and LSU. And then Clemson is undefeated but has been under the radar. If it ends up OSU vs LSU in the National Championship game, you'll think back that there were only 2 good teams that mattered.
This year, there are so many teams that look so good
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News