- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Federal Reserve economist says growth would have been better with negative interest rates
Posted on 10/24/19 at 6:47 am
Posted on 10/24/19 at 6:47 am
quote:
In a recent research paper, San Francisco Fed economist Jens H.E. Christensen looked at the results of five foreign central banks that implemented subzero rates starting in 2012, when the Danish National Bank first went negative. In each case, the move immediately brought government rates down and helped loosen up those economies.
quote:
Had the U.S. done the same, Christensen wrote, its growth rate after the financial crisis might have been better. The U.S. Federal Reserve took its benchmark rate down to a target range of zero to 0.25% at one point, but never crossed the threshold to go negative.
“Evidence that the U.S. post-crisis economic recovery was constrained by this policy choice ... suggests that mildly negative U.S. policy rates from 2009 to 2011 could have supported higher economic growth and eventually pushed up inflation closer to the Federal Reserve’s target,” he said.
quote:
Using those subzero rates, he said, reflects “the shared belief that zero is either a real or self-imposed constraint was wrong and was no longer valid.”
LINK
And here’s the link to the actual study: LINK
Hopefully this research clears up some of the confusion some posters have regarding negative rates. The number zero is just a construct we have in our minds, but isn’t valid. If we had pursued negative rates during the 2008 recession according to this research we would have been better off. Right now we are at a disadvantage because the rest of the world has such low interest rates relative to ours the real value of the dollar increases, and this appreciation reduces U.S. net exports and the quantity of goods and services demanded shifting the aggregate-demand curve left. This is not helpful and Trump / Mnuchin understand this.
Posted on 10/24/19 at 7:00 am to OleWarSkuleAlum
a bubble always looks like a stronger economy...until it pops
Posted on 10/24/19 at 7:08 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
a bubble always looks like a stronger economy...until it pops
What bubble are you referencing? Are you implying we currently are in a bubble?
Posted on 10/24/19 at 8:00 am to OleWarSkuleAlum
quote:
What bubble are you referencing?
The one where other economies appear strong due to artificially low interest rates that aren't sustainable and quite rapidly promote inflation.
Posted on 10/24/19 at 8:02 am to Hopeful Doc
quote:
The one where other economies appear strong due to artificially low interest rates that aren't sustainable and quite rapidly promote inflation.
We've been on the low side of inflation target for years despite QE and low rates.
Posted on 10/24/19 at 8:12 am to OleWarSkuleAlum
Posted on 10/24/19 at 10:00 am to 90proofprofessional
And Europe’s economy seems to be booming with their negative interest rates lol
Posted on 10/24/19 at 11:46 am to Hopeful Doc
quote:
The one where other economies appear strong due to artificially low interest rates that aren't sustainable and quite rapidly promote inflation.
What economies specifically are you referencing? We appear to be in a global slowdown bordering recession outside of the U.S.
Posted on 10/24/19 at 12:06 pm to OleWarSkuleAlum
quote:
Right now we are at a disadvantage because the rest of the world has such low interest rates relative to ours the real value of the dollar increases
The value of the dollar increasing is impossible to distinguish from the value of, for instance, the Euro decreasing on the global scale. The reason the value of the Euro decreasing relative to the dollar? Negative rates. It isn't a coincidence.
quote:
We appear to be in a global slowdown bordering recession outside of the U.S
Your first comment was that you didn't recognize there was a bubble. Your second one shows that you understand that we are witnessing the comedown/collapse of the bubble of economic "growth" and "prosperity" which were, in retrospect, could easily be simply the product of inflation.
For you to recognize things are slowing surely implies that you understand things were recently/previously "good" or "strong," right? Or growing? What SFP, if I understand him, and myself implied is that negative rates caused an unsustainable (like a bubble) period of growth that we are seeing the end of, and I am calling negative rates a cause of the situation.
ETA: further, I am suggesting that a negative rate here would have promoted higher, unsustainable growth that would lead to another crisis.
This post was edited on 10/24/19 at 12:10 pm
Posted on 10/24/19 at 1:22 pm to OleWarSkuleAlum
On behalf of all productive savers in this world...
....go to hell.
....go to hell.
Posted on 10/24/19 at 1:23 pm to UpstairsComputer
quote:
UpstairsComputer
It’s clear you don’t understand how inflation effects the money supply.
This post was edited on 10/24/19 at 1:23 pm
Posted on 10/24/19 at 1:24 pm to Hopeful Doc
quote:
myself implied is that negative rates caused an unsustainable (like a bubble) period of growth that we are seeing the end of, and I am calling negative rates a cause of the situation.
Monetary policy disagrees with you. You need to take a basic macro-economics course.
Posted on 10/24/19 at 1:25 pm to Boatshoes
quote:
On behalf of all productive savers in this world... ....go to hell.
Okay just put your money in equities which have a much more favorable yield.
Posted on 10/24/19 at 1:53 pm to OleWarSkuleAlum
As much as I get downvoted in the fantasy board it’s nice to know I’m not the most hated person on TD.com.
Posted on 10/24/19 at 2:18 pm to Shepherd88
quote:
And Europe’s economy seems to be booming with their negative interest rates lol
and all that hyperinflati- oh, wait.
Posted on 10/24/19 at 2:51 pm to OleWarSkuleAlum
You can’t use a study that benefits from hindsight to justify that negative interest rates make sense in the present.
And do you honestly believe that what is “holding the economy back” is the availability or cost of money?
Or do you suppose it is more likely that uncertainty regarding policy, trade, and global recession concerns might be to blame?
And do you honestly believe that what is “holding the economy back” is the availability or cost of money?
Or do you suppose it is more likely that uncertainty regarding policy, trade, and global recession concerns might be to blame?
Posted on 10/24/19 at 2:57 pm to OleWarSkuleAlum
quote:It’s the other way around. And the correct word is “affects.”
It’s clear you don’t understand how inflation effects the money supply.
Posted on 10/24/19 at 3:01 pm to OleWarSkuleAlum
Yeah well manipulating markets have consequences. The fed's manipulation of interest rates has always had consequences.
I am not an END THE FED guy but I am an end the Fed setting of discounts rates guy. Let them float--the economy will instantly respond.
I am not an END THE FED guy but I am an end the Fed setting of discounts rates guy. Let them float--the economy will instantly respond.
Posted on 10/24/19 at 3:59 pm to I B Freeman
quote:
Yeah well manipulating markets have consequences. The fed's manipulation of interest rates has always had consequences.
I am not an END THE FED guy but I am an end the Fed setting of discounts rates guy. Let them float--the economy will instantly respond.
We can’t have a fractional reserve banking system without the FOMC setting the discount rate.
Back to top

6







