Started By
Message

re: The Nuremberg Trials

Posted on 10/6/19 at 4:56 pm to
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65147 posts
Posted on 10/6/19 at 4:56 pm to
quote:

If you shoot at your neighbor who is minding his own business standing in his yard and he gets a gun and shoots back to defend himself, both of you have taken the same action.

But, YOU are going to jail, not him.


Hardly a valid argument considering the one who shot back is also the arresting officer, judge and jury in the criminal proceedings. Of course you're not going to jail in that particular instance.

Posted by OWLFAN86
The OT has made me richer
Member since Jun 2004
176757 posts
Posted on 10/6/19 at 4:57 pm to
quote:

Are you really starting a thread sympathizing with a Nazi leader?

did Nazi that coming
Posted by FightnBobLafollette
Member since Oct 2017
12204 posts
Posted on 10/6/19 at 5:01 pm to
quote:

Rudolf Hess is one of those men. He was the leader of the Nazi Party until he mysteriously hijacked a plane and crash-landed it in Great Britain in 1940. He wanted to broker peace talks between the Allies and Germans. The dude spends the rest of the war as a POW, gets put on trial in Nuremberg, and found guilty of - get this - crimes against peace.


That’s a whole lot of BS.
Posted by USMEagles
Member since Jan 2018
11811 posts
Posted on 10/6/19 at 5:12 pm to
quote:

The alternative would have been drum head courtmartials followed by immediate executions, or even just mass roundups followed by executions.


Potentially false dichotomy.
Posted by Shiftyplus1
Regret nothing that made you smile
Member since Oct 2005
13396 posts
Posted on 10/6/19 at 5:20 pm to
quote:

I find "laws" for warfare amusing.


The systematic extermination of 6 million men, women, and children is not warfare.
Posted by supadave3
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2005
30329 posts
Posted on 10/6/19 at 5:32 pm to
quote:


My fourth cousin once removed got 20 years


What does 'once removed'mean? I always hear that and have no clue what it means.

Also, I think you're lying.
Posted by Dandy Lion
Member since Feb 2010
50261 posts
Posted on 10/6/19 at 6:20 pm to
Were the US bombs on Japan legal?
Posted by LSUTigersVCURams
Member since Jul 2014
21940 posts
Posted on 10/6/19 at 6:20 pm to
They were show trials. A dog and pony show.
Posted by Dandy Lion
Member since Feb 2010
50261 posts
Posted on 10/6/19 at 6:25 pm to
I think it means second cousin.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65147 posts
Posted on 10/6/19 at 6:37 pm to
quote:

Were the US bombs on Japan legal?


Yes.
Posted by TheFonz
Somewhere in Louisiana
Member since Jul 2016
20537 posts
Posted on 10/6/19 at 6:39 pm to
Baldur Von Schirach

Our common ancestor was Arthur Middleton, who was a signer of the Declaration of Independence. Middleton is my great-great-great-great-great grandfather.

As far as the once removed thing, beats the hell out of me. Once I read about the connection, I used the
cousin calculator to figure out how Schirach and I were kin.

Even my grandfather looked kind of like him:



Von Schirach:

This post was edited on 10/6/19 at 7:05 pm
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98536 posts
Posted on 10/6/19 at 6:41 pm to
quote:

Potentially false dichotomy.


The Russians weren't going to let bygones be bygones.
Posted by northshorebamaman
Cochise County AZ
Member since Jul 2009
35551 posts
Posted on 10/6/19 at 6:43 pm to
quote:

What does 'once removed'mean?
A first cousin once removed is the child of your first cousin. A second cousin is someone you share a great grandparent with.

I think.
Posted by TigerstuckinMS
Member since Nov 2005
33687 posts
Posted on 10/6/19 at 6:44 pm to
quote:

I think it means second cousin.

Nope. I looked this up recently because I was always confused as frick about what it meant, too.

Siblings share both pairs of grandparents.

First cousins share only one pair of grandparents, unless you're in Alabama.

Second cousins share only one pair of great grandparents.

Third cousins share only one pair of great great grandparents, and so on.

As our Alabama example shows, if two people share more than one pair of ancestors at any level, there's some inbreeding going on. Most cousins (outside Alabama) start sharing multiple sets somewhere around third or fourth cousins. Very quickly, it becomes completely impossible to not have some level of inbreeding simply because the number of ancestors required grows exponentially and populations just aren't big enough to have no inbreeding.

Removal is when you're describing cousin relationships that skip generations. For example, my first cousin's kids are my first cousins once removed and my parents' first cousins are also my first cousins once removed.

My first cousin's grandkids are my first cousins twice removed and my grandparents' first cousins are also my first cousins twice removed. This also applies to higher degrees of cousins. So, my second cousin's kids are my second cousins once removed.

Of course in this discussion of removal, we're also excluding Alabama where your sister is also your first cousin (and wife) and your uncle dad is also your first cousin, once removed... on your mom's side.

EDIT: I just remembered there is one non-Alabama reason first cousins can share all four grandparents. It's when your parents' siblings have kids with each other, like when two brothers marry two sisters.
This post was edited on 10/6/19 at 7:07 pm
Posted by Ghost of Colby
Alberta, overlooking B.C.
Member since Jan 2009
11465 posts
Posted on 10/6/19 at 6:47 pm to
quote:

Rudolf Hess was not a "wartime consigliere." By the start of the war, Hess had been finding himself in disagreement more and more with what Hitler


No. Hess was pushed aside in wartime Germany because his role had little to do with the war. Hess was jealous and insane. He wasn’t the peaceful voice of reason within the Nazi hierarchy.

His office was responsible for drafting laws and reviewing sentences handed out by the courts. He sent many people to their death simply because he deemed them enemies of the party. He was spared the gallows because the holocaust didn’t ramp up until he was out of the picture.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98536 posts
Posted on 10/6/19 at 6:49 pm to
Another fun fact: Ronald Spiers (Band of Brothers) served as governor of Spandau Prison for a time
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65147 posts
Posted on 10/6/19 at 6:57 pm to
quote:

His office was responsible for drafting laws and reviewing sentences handed out by the courts. He sent many people to their death simply because he deemed them enemies of the party.


Okay. But he wasn't on trial for any of that as he successfully argued that these were the inner workings of a sovereign state made before hostilities were ever declared. Stalin had millions of his own people killed in the interwar period and yet he and the people who carried out the sentences were never so much as questioned by a military tribunal.

He was found guilty of crimes against peace and planning a war of aggression. He was found not guilty of war crimes and not guilty of crimes against humanity. The dude absolutely 100% did not deserve life imprisonment.
Posted by Strannix
District 11
Member since Dec 2012
49134 posts
Posted on 10/6/19 at 6:59 pm to
If you believe in the idea of a greater good or lesser evil we should have never entered the war on the side of the Soviets, that decision cost a hundred million people their lives.
Posted by Keltic Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2006
19442 posts
Posted on 10/6/19 at 7:05 pm to
"Albert Speer did nothing". As Hitler's architect, he was responsible for massive building projects across Germany. Projects that required 100,000's of slave labor to build them. He was also involved in the building of the underground rocket sights, in conditions worse than most death camps, resulting in the horrible deaths of 1000,s of slave laborers. When he was released from prison, he openly mocked the allies for being fooled so easily. Hess was a rabid, hard core Hitler supporter who had a lot of input in the Nuremberg Laws, laws that gutted Germany's Jews of their legal rights. He was as big a rabble rousing Nazi speech giver as any of the inner circle. And as noted, it was the Russians, not the Nuremberg judges, who kept him in prison all those years.
Posted by Hogbit
Benton, AR
Member since Aug 2019
1441 posts
Posted on 10/6/19 at 7:06 pm to
quote:

russians

frick the russians. We should have destroyed them when we had the chance.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram