- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The Whstleblower lied from the outset, claimed to have "firsthand" knowledge of misconduct
Posted on 10/1/19 at 11:28 am
Posted on 10/1/19 at 11:28 am
LINK
So ANOTHER Dem attempt to subvert an open and free election was based on a fricking lie.
Where have we heard this story before?
quote:
The inspector general for the intelligence community said late Monday that the whistleblower whose complaint touched off an impeachment inquiry claimed to have firsthand knowledge of misconduct -- a claim that appears to conflict with documents sent to Congress and the director of national intelligence. The lengthy statement Monday was posted in response to questions, raised in the media and by congressional Republicans, about the disclosure form filed by the whistleblower, who first flagged concerns about President Trump's July phone call in which he asked the leader of Ukraine to "look into" actions by former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden. The IG said the whistleblower stated on an initial form Aug. 12 "that he or she possessed both first-hand and other information."
So ANOTHER Dem attempt to subvert an open and free election was based on a fricking lie.
Where have we heard this story before?
18
Posted on 10/1/19 at 11:30 am to bamarep
doesn't matter the narrative is out that he had first hand knowledge....
goal was achieved. most wont know of the correction
goal was achieved. most wont know of the correction
Posted on 10/1/19 at 11:30 am to bamarep
I think that IG is suspect too, and might be in hot water, especially if a criminal complaint is filed by Nunes and his cohorts.
Posted on 10/1/19 at 11:31 am to bamarep
The truth is they still haven’t accepted the results of the 2016 election, and they’ll do anything to overturn it.
Posted on 10/1/19 at 11:32 am to bamarep
This was all coordinated. You can tell bc the Democrat media complex was hyping this spook as a whistleblower, when real whistleblowers like Assange got treated as spies by the Obama administration.
All to get trump.
All to get trump.
Posted on 10/1/19 at 11:33 am to tigeraddict
But, but, but
SCHITTFORBRAINS READ US THE TRANSCRIPT!!!!!!!!!!!
SCHITTFORBRAINS READ US THE TRANSCRIPT!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted on 10/1/19 at 11:34 am to bamarep
i think this whole thing smells like the clinton machine.
1) Attack Trump/try to de-legitimatize his election yet again
2) Attack biden, the front runner in the process.
3) also, in the news this week, was "big Dem doners" sitting out or supporting trump if warren is the dem nomination
4) today, Facebook says it will plan on suing fedgov if warren is elected
All these attempts will lead Hillary to "reluctantly" step in to save the party and the nation...
1) Attack Trump/try to de-legitimatize his election yet again
2) Attack biden, the front runner in the process.
3) also, in the news this week, was "big Dem doners" sitting out or supporting trump if warren is the dem nomination
4) today, Facebook says it will plan on suing fedgov if warren is elected
All these attempts will lead Hillary to "reluctantly" step in to save the party and the nation...
Posted on 10/1/19 at 11:39 am to bamarep
Any person who is pushing this Ukraine peach mint stuff, is a certified moron.
Posted on 10/1/19 at 11:43 am to bamarep
Looks like the IG is going with incompetence on his part. Maybe it will save him, and he can undo the damage, but feel it’s too late, and feel he’s a deep State agent, hiding in the open.....
Posted on 10/1/19 at 11:44 am to bamarep
1) There is no law requiring first hand information
The IG also found that the whistleblower had authorized access to documents that would have given him first hand knowledge. Right?
The IG also found that the whistleblower had authorized access to documents that would have given him first hand knowledge. Right?
Posted on 10/1/19 at 11:45 am to bamarep
Trump fricked them by releasing the transcript.
He was supposed to block its release to protect the office
If the transcript was hidden this bullshite would be believed without question
He was supposed to block its release to protect the office
If the transcript was hidden this bullshite would be believed without question
Posted on 10/1/19 at 11:46 am to bmy
I think what is being linked is there was no urgency for second hand info. The IG was fooled, speculation, that they had first hand info and step up the classification
Posted on 10/1/19 at 11:48 am to CamdenTiger
If this whistleblower was given the information by someone then I want that someone hanging in the town square.
Posted on 10/1/19 at 11:51 am to tigeraddict
quote:
i think this whole thing smells like the clinton machine.
1) Attack Trump/try to de-legitimatize his election yet again
2) Attack biden, the front runner in the process.
3) also, in the news this week, was "big Dem doners" sitting out or supporting trump if warren is the dem nomination
4) today, Facebook says it will plan on suing fedgov if warren is elected
All these attempts will lead Hillary to "reluctantly" step in to save the party and the nation...
It’s such an obvious Clinton scheme, it’s almost too obvious.
Maybe it’s someone else.
Someone else who would benefit from the demise of Trump, Biden, and Warren.
Hmm..
Well played Bernie!
Posted on 10/1/19 at 11:52 am to CamdenTiger
quote:
I think what is being linked is there was no urgency for second hand info. The IG was fooled, speculation, that they had first hand info and step up the classification
Question: are you more concerned about process or about the allegation?
The IG confirmed that he vetted the complaint and found it both urgent and credible.
This post was edited on 10/1/19 at 11:54 am
Posted on 10/1/19 at 12:00 pm to bmy
quote:
There is no law requiring first hand information
Well, there was until the hours leading up to the complaint being filed.
When, exactly were the rules changed?
Who changed them?
Why were they changed?
Who decided on the criteria to be included in the change?
These are all pertinent questions that the American public deserves answers to.
Posted on 10/1/19 at 12:04 pm to bmy
quote:
The IG confirmed that he vetted the complaint and found it both urgent and credible
Neither the WB or the IG knew what was in the transcript. There was no way the IG could vet any facts, and has said that. All IG had was basic info. Now looks like egg on everyone involved after everything was declassified
Posted on 10/1/19 at 12:04 pm to bmy
The point flew over your head. If they lied about having 1st hand knowledge, and they didnt, then you can't trust anything they said.
Posted on 10/1/19 at 12:07 pm to CamdenTiger
quote:
Now looks like egg on everyone involved after everything was declassified
Huh?
Posted on 10/1/19 at 12:09 pm to bmy
Why are you continuously backing a false fake narrative? Did the orange bad man grab your mom in the...?
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News