- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 7/26/19 at 12:35 pm to brooksbabino
the list shows 56....
Does anyone really believe that the clintons weren’t responsible for at least one of these deaths? I’d personally be shocked if the real number ended up below 10.
Does anyone really believe that the clintons weren’t responsible for at least one of these deaths? I’d personally be shocked if the real number ended up below 10.
This post was edited on 7/26/19 at 12:37 pm
Posted on 7/26/19 at 12:41 pm to FlexDawg
Every day people are killed for mere hundreds of dollars. Robberies, drug deals gone bad, ect. People are killed for cutting someone off on the interstate.
To assume that “expendable people” like bodyguards, police and interns aren’t killed over billions in government largess is not crazy. In fact it’s crazy to think people ARENT killed. It’s like suggesting the mafia does’t kill people.
To assume that “expendable people” like bodyguards, police and interns aren’t killed over billions in government largess is not crazy. In fact it’s crazy to think people ARENT killed. It’s like suggesting the mafia does’t kill people.
Posted on 7/26/19 at 12:44 pm to brooksbabino
quote:
I'm only having a discussion.
No you're not, you're just repeating saying you refute it.
1. You really mean reject (I think you've used both); you haven't actually refuted anything.
2. A discussion, to you, is comparing people to flat earthers and appeals to ridicule?
As I said, if the topic really doesn't interest you because you reject (not refute, you haven't done that) it, then it's curious you'd participate in the thread at all. It would appear that it interests you a lot and your main purpose is to ridicule the claim, because you think that accomplishes something. Explaining why Barry Seal doesn't belong on the list is a discussion.
Posted on 7/26/19 at 12:53 pm to Robin Masters
quote:
In fact it’s crazy to think people ARENT killed. It’s like suggesting the mafia does’t kill people.
Exactly. People who just brush off this topic with "oh, that's conspiracy theory nonsense" aren't living in reality. If you took a map of the US and asked yourself "Ok, where would the stakes be high enough for white collar, otherwise "respectable" people to have someone killed?", you'd probably draw circles around Chicago, Vegas, NY and DC.
Tell someone that the CEO of BigBusinessInc had someone killed to prevent a billion dollar lawsuit and they won't blink, tell them that the power brokers in the power center of the world arranged it and they scoff. It's bizarre.
Posted on 7/26/19 at 12:57 pm to Flats
I didn't realize you are the arbiter of defining what qualifies as a discussion. I'm not setting up a two column deductive proof in debate format here, nor is OP. I'm simply stating that the evidence is anecdotal at best and that such a large and complex claim should require ample evidence to back it up. I am repeating it because you aren't accepting what I am telling you. Instead you are bogged down in minutia and presuming to know my thoughts and intentions when I am telling you the crux of my problem with the thread.
Posted on 7/26/19 at 1:05 pm to brooksbabino
quote:
1990s chain mail conspiracy theory
So which of the listed deaths do you refute as incorrect?
Posted on 7/26/19 at 1:22 pm to omegaman66
This article links out to a few other stories. LINK
Posted on 7/26/19 at 2:09 pm to CelticDog
quote:
Everybody over 75 has 56 dead friends.
Oh, come on, you know the Clintons are just outliers.
Posted on 7/26/19 at 2:32 pm to brooksbabino
quote:
I didn't realize you are the arbiter of defining what qualifies as a discussion.
I didn't realize you were the arbiter of who had the burden of proof, so I guess we both made some assumptions the other might not share.
Posted on 7/26/19 at 2:37 pm to FlexDawg
If you know a lot of people and you're really old then you probably know at least 56 people that have died
They might be an acquaintance more than a friend. shite no one even has 56 friends if they're over the age of 25
They might be an acquaintance more than a friend. shite no one even has 56 friends if they're over the age of 25
Posted on 7/26/19 at 3:40 pm to brooksbabino
quote:false. The email lists the evidence which is a matter of public record.
So far the only evidence being offered is a 1990s chain mail which is anecdotal at best
quote:false again. The list is brute fact. If you want your denial to have any credence, then yes. You would indeed need to go down the list with a rebuttal for each instance.
It is not up to ME to go down and scratch names off the list
quote:this is not an extraordinary claim. It is a list of facts which altogether are highly suspicious.
Extraordinary claims
Posted on 7/26/19 at 3:43 pm to brooksbabino
quote:ok, prove it. Show that the instances are episodic, not systemic. Iow, that they are not related because prima facie, they are.
I'm simply stating that the evidence is anecdotal at best
Posted on 7/26/19 at 3:43 pm to CelticDog
quote:
CelticDog
Can you do us a favor and befriend Mi Abuela?
Posted on 7/26/19 at 3:46 pm to Powerman
quote:people who were politically opposed to me in some way, 12 of whom were trained leo/soldiers, others who were journalists investigating me? Pretty much no one in the world can say that apart from some 3rd world country leaders.
If you know a lot of people and you're really old then you probably know at least 56 people that have died
Posted on 7/26/19 at 3:56 pm to Powerman
quote:
If you know a lot of people and you're really old then you probably know at least 56 people that have died
You are creating a strawman.
The real argument is....
How many wealthy famous people know 56 others that died of suicide/murder/plane crashes
The experiment is very easy. You could just look at other politicians, past presidents, movie stars, etc. Can you connect that many murders/suicides/plane crashes to someone else?
I'm a middle class person, and I know of one person who committed suicide, no one that has been murdered, and no one that has died in a plane crash.
Page 3 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News