Started By
Message

re: Smoothie King Center lifespan

Posted on 7/21/19 at 10:31 am to
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61581 posts
Posted on 7/21/19 at 10:31 am to
quote:

I think that’s fine for the Dome but I just don’t see if with SKC


Why? The reason teams build new stadiums/arenas isn't to give the fans a shiny new building they'll think is pretty. It's typically because the older bones don't properly support more lucrative features that are a lot easier to sell in bigger cities with a large corporate base.

Maybe if the Zion era is wildly successful the team will feel the SKC is what's keeping it from making more money, but with where the team and the fan base is at now, the product on the court is what's keeping the team from making more money.

It will be interesting to see how the Benson Empire handles negotiations with the state now. Griffin is selling the "Steward of a community asset" role hard for Mrs. Benson. When Tom Benson did his shake downs and threatened to move the team, you knew he wanted the money more than he wanted to move, but you also thought he might actually move the team.

The stances Mrs. Benson has taken with the Pels really reduce her leverage. But they may not need as much leverage. Since they changed "inducements" from the state to rent from the state, maybe all they need to do is raise the rent instead of putting on a dog an pony show justifying a shake down.
This post was edited on 7/21/19 at 10:42 am
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84891 posts
Posted on 7/21/19 at 7:13 pm to
quote:

Why?


Well it’s already one of the older arenas in the league. Maybe I’m wrong but it’s hard to imagine it being still viable 10-15 years from now.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram