- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Daughter's So Cali mortgage went up about $500. mo due to tax increases. Crazy.
Posted on 7/6/19 at 11:24 am to cwill
Posted on 7/6/19 at 11:24 am to cwill
quote:
So the appraised value of the property increased so they have to pay more prop tax? That’s not a tax increase per se, that’s an appraisal issue
Lol
0
Posted on 7/6/19 at 11:27 am to Aubie Spr96
quote:
I have a customer in rural California with a home on well water. The state sent someone out to look at putting a meter on her well in order to tax her for the water. She said she’s not far from leaving.
There is no way this is legal.
Posted on 7/6/19 at 11:28 am to mmcgrath
The problem with the folks next door are they spill over into the street. 3 families with 1500 sq ft means some sleep in the beater(s) parked on the street in front of their house and even eat sitting on the curb at times. Try it Buster Brown and report back.
Posted on 7/6/19 at 11:33 am to tilco
quote:
quote:
I have a customer in rural California with a home on well water. The state sent someone out to look at putting a meter on her well in order to tax her for the water. She said she’s not far from leaving.
There is no way this is legal.
I don’t know the law in CA but water rights out west are a lot different than the SE.
Posted on 7/6/19 at 1:38 pm to jimdog
The property value is the property value, regardless of the size of the house or the identity of the neighbors.
A 1500 square-foot house in Dallas has less than 10% of the monetary value of the same house located in Manhattan.
the amount of the monthly principal and interest payment may be exactly the same size in either state, but the monthly payment to the bank in New York will be significantly larger. The bank is escrowing money for property taxes on 10 times the value, plus property insurance on 10 times the value.
A 1500 square-foot house in Dallas has less than 10% of the monetary value of the same house located in Manhattan.
the amount of the monthly principal and interest payment may be exactly the same size in either state, but the monthly payment to the bank in New York will be significantly larger. The bank is escrowing money for property taxes on 10 times the value, plus property insurance on 10 times the value.
Posted on 7/6/19 at 1:39 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
They chose to live there.
If he is the military, then your quote may not (and probably doesn't) apply.
Posted on 7/6/19 at 1:41 pm to jimdog
quote:I find myself wondering whether the Democrats are to be called responsible for the significant increase in the value of this family’s largest asset. This thread did start as a complaint about Democrats, right?
I would guess the appraised value. Payment increased $480. mo.
This post was edited on 7/6/19 at 2:20 pm
Posted on 7/6/19 at 1:45 pm to tilco
quote:Water is property. Government tax property all the time. I am not saying I agree with this concept. To the contrary, it seems ridiculous. That is a long way from saying that it is illegal.quote:There is no way this is legal.
I have a customer in rural California with a home on well water. The state sent someone out to look at putting a meter on her well in order to tax her for the water. She said she’s not far from leaving.
Before this thread ends, someone will accuse me of supporting taxes upon drinking your own water.
Posted on 7/6/19 at 1:45 pm to cwill
quote:Then my interpretation of your question was in error. See above response to Hank.
Asking a question of the OP said the mtg went up due to tax increases...I’m simply asking what tax increased the mtg.
Posted on 7/6/19 at 1:51 pm to cwill
This post was edited on 7/6/19 at 2:04 pm
Posted on 7/6/19 at 1:55 pm to UAinSOUTHAL
Looks like the market is offering a solution.
Too bad there is a no sex rule.
California bunk house $1200 mo.
Too bad there is a no sex rule.
California bunk house $1200 mo.
quote:
In Los Angeles and San Francisco, where prices are particularly exorbitant, people have taken to renting bunk beds in communal homes.
PodShare, which provides 10 to 15 co-ed bunkbeds in six locations across California, is hoping to help solve the affordable housing crisis.
The beds can be rented from $35 to $50 a night, which amounts to between $1,050 and $1500 for one month.
Posted on 7/6/19 at 1:55 pm to Golfer
(no message)
This post was edited on 7/6/19 at 2:04 pm
Posted on 7/6/19 at 1:56 pm to jimdog
It's a funny cycle California has created. Raise taxes to pay for pensions and free shite, and create more homelessness. Raise taxes to help the increased homelessness and that creates more people without homes.
California will not be able to sustain what they are doing, and they will expect the nation to bail them out.
California will not be able to sustain what they are doing, and they will expect the nation to bail them out.
Posted on 7/6/19 at 2:06 pm to jimdog
Sounds like on-base housing is the way to go in CA.
Posted on 7/6/19 at 2:07 pm to ShortyRob
To summarize the thread, we have now answered the OP’s questions.
First, the OP accidentally overstated the increase in the monthly payment by $1000. This was the vast majority of the difference.
Second, the vast majority of the remaining change could be attributed to an increase in the appraised value of the home, with a concomitant increase in the amount of property tax being escrowed each month.
Thirdly, there would have been increased insurance costs related (1) to increased property value and (2) also to the recent fire history in the area.
None of this is related in any way to any action by any governmental entity (be it state local or otherwise, be it Dem or GOP). Unless you want to thank/blame a political party for increases in property values.
I will not be holding my breath for an apology from those members of the brain trust who accused me of being a partisan hack for asking exactly the very questions which solved this puzzle.
First, the OP accidentally overstated the increase in the monthly payment by $1000. This was the vast majority of the difference.
Second, the vast majority of the remaining change could be attributed to an increase in the appraised value of the home, with a concomitant increase in the amount of property tax being escrowed each month.
Thirdly, there would have been increased insurance costs related (1) to increased property value and (2) also to the recent fire history in the area.
None of this is related in any way to any action by any governmental entity (be it state local or otherwise, be it Dem or GOP). Unless you want to thank/blame a political party for increases in property values.
I will not be holding my breath for an apology from those members of the brain trust who accused me of being a partisan hack for asking exactly the very questions which solved this puzzle.
This post was edited on 7/6/19 at 10:15 pm
Posted on 7/6/19 at 2:09 pm to AggieHank86
quote:Well, I don't know why this is in response to me.
I will not be holding my breath for an apology from those members of the brain trust who accused me of being a partisan hack for asking exactly the very questions which solved this puzzle.
I've barely participated in this thread.
Posted on 7/6/19 at 2:11 pm to ShortyRob
Two reasons, neither of which is very important.
First, you were the person who ridiculed the original questioner about the nature of the change. You fixed that, to your credit.
Second, your post just happened to be the last one on the thread when I was ready to post
First, you were the person who ridiculed the original questioner about the nature of the change. You fixed that, to your credit.
Second, your post just happened to be the last one on the thread when I was ready to post
Posted on 7/6/19 at 2:12 pm to AggieHank86
quote:Exactly. I simply misinterpreted the reason for his question.
First, you were the person who ridiculed the original questioner about the nature of the change. You fixed that, to your credit.
And, despite assertions to the contrary, I tend to be a candid and forthright poster on this board. This ain't my first time admitting error, won't be the last.
Posted on 7/6/19 at 2:18 pm to jimdog
I make a little over 140k in San Diego and feel middle class at best. My income in neighboring Nevada or Arizona would be baller status
Posted on 7/6/19 at 2:19 pm to Sentrius
The problem with them leaving is they bring their bad ideas to other places. They flat out refuse to change and want you to change to the environment they are escaping
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News