Question that needs to be asked about Climate Change

I agree they should be much more focused on India and China. MUCH more.

But it's the easy way out to justify Dem government.

I do think pollution in general is a worthy concern, but Dems often go overboard with ideas of killing the economy for a 10% reduction.

Really good point. If the world is going to end in 11 years and 6 months according to the climate alarmists, to save the world the alarmists should support full scale war against the largest CO2 emitters, India and China. We must stop them before everyone dies.

quote:

---

NikolaiJakov

---

Russian bot is Russian

You’re forgetting that the USA is the shining beacon that all of humanity follows.

When we set a good example, all will follow including Choina.

/sarcasm

Man made Global warming = all of the hot air caused from talking about it.

Republicans are more willing to make real changes to help prevent climate change then democrats. Democrats are just using it to destroy our country. We could lower emissions in a lot of easy ways but democrats are not going to give anything up to prevent climate change because they don’t actually believe in it . If republicans were not part of the state then they would be pushing bills for climate change and other democrat hoax’s and then call them out on it when they vote against it .

quote:

---

Question that needs to be asked about Climate Change

---

The biggest question remains: why were so many right wingers opposed to admit its existence? Yes, many still do to this day. Well, they either don't admit to any validity, or they make connections to excuses like you.

Address the question in the OP.

A simple Wikipedia check of Geological Periods will show you that many of the Earth's features and forms were caused by a changing climate. Anybody who believes climate change is some impending, man-made, disaster is just ignorant and "anti-science."

Democrats are incapable of honesty on any topic - honesty leads to discussion of root causes. all Democrats can do is dredge up ficticious 'problems' that only THEY can solve - and that 'solution' always involves destroying any political opposition they have.

The entire DEMCORAT agenda is hate-driven with not an ounce of honesty or integrity.

The climate change orthodoxy is the clearest case I've ever seen of the idiom "a little knowledge is a dangerous thing." On it's face it's seemingly simple logic, and so any halfwit and politicians (usually closer to a tenthwit or at maximum a quarterwit) fancies himself or herself an expert. When in reality the issue is varying shades of gray (most of which are quite a light hue, almost bordering on transparent).

I would say that the reason many republicans fought against even acknowledge of "climate change" is because there was always disaster looming around the corner, but the story kept flipping between "global warming" and the "big chill". From there it gets into a slippery slope argument (which as I've gotten older realized that it is mischaracterized as a logical fallacy when there is ample evidence to show that when it comes to governmental policies, it's actually the blueprint). If you give the inch on this being an existential threat, well now almost any action is justifiable. War against polluting countries, prison sentences for folks that leave their ac on while they're out of town or take showers lasting longer than 5 minutes or smokers (those damn moving point sources). Putting the onus of protection on to the government, and off of the individual's ability to choose is an invitation for legally sanctioned abuse.