Started By
Message

re: Breaking development in Roger Stone Case.

Posted on 6/17/19 at 4:29 pm to
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
79941 posts
Posted on 6/17/19 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

bmy


See? I knew you were a Stalinist.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48672 posts
Posted on 6/17/19 at 4:34 pm to
quote:

don't see how evidence related to the origins of an investigation are relevant to charges of witness tampering.


That is not the standard. At all.

quote:

It's rock solid


Something no litigator has ever said. Good Lord.

quote:

solid -- he instructed someone to lie under oath, threatened him, etc

I doubt you know the elements/defenses etc. however, let’s assume you are correct. That has zero to do with evidentiary standards and procedures. Of which you clearly don’t care about. You just want your “side” to win.

It makes your inability to grasp a simple concept like “corrupt intent” all the more explainable. I was engaging you in good faith and honest debate. You are simply dishonest. This is now painfully clear.
Posted by Crimson1st
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2010
20258 posts
Posted on 6/17/19 at 5:15 pm to
quote:

he Mueller team has tried to keep Stone from the "evidence" against him stating it's not necessary for his defense


quote:

Isn't this unconstitutional? Or does that just pertain to accusers?


Not so certain Mueller nor TPTB behind him really give a damn about the Constitution.
Posted by Gus007
TN
Member since Jul 2018
12036 posts
Posted on 6/17/19 at 5:56 pm to
quote:

It's hard to believe this is real life.




When I was young and I naive, I watched the movie "Count of Monte Cristo" and thinking, thankfully that doesn't happen in the USA.

Wrong!
So sad!
Posted by 9th life
birmingham
Member since Sep 2009
7310 posts
Posted on 6/17/19 at 9:51 pm to
Tony,
If it comes to that, you’ll be missed.
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 7:07 am to
quote:


That is not the standard. At all.



That's up for the judge to decide, no? There hasn't been a trial yet so this is the process working as intended.

quote:

Something no litigator has ever said. Good Lord.



Good thing I'm just watching the ballgame. What % of cases do you think the federal government loses? They don't typically litigate when they could lose.. in other words -- rock solid.

quote:

Of which you clearly don’t care about. You just want your “side” to win.


We both know he is guilty You just care more about the process than about justice -- I respect that because the process is important. I'd prefer to see the scumbag headed to spend the rest of his life in jail. Then I can chuckle when he gets his pardon.
This post was edited on 6/18/19 at 7:08 am
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48672 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 7:31 am to
quote:

That's up for the judge to decide, no? There hasn't been a trial yet so this is the process working as intended.


It is pretty rare in a criminal case for the prosecutor to not just open their files (Brady and all). The fact that the prosecution has stated the material “isn’t needed for a defense” is an argument that reeks. Everything is up to the judge, I guess. My initial comment in this thread was simply to point out your disregard for evidentiary standards in favor of glee over your “side” “winning”.

quote:

Good thing I'm just watching the ballgame.

No shite.


quote:

What % of cases do you think the federal government loses? They don't typically litigate when they could lose.. in other words -- rock solid.

Your ignorance knows no bounds.

quote:

We both know he is guilty


No. You are a dishonest and ignorant useful idiot that doesn’t even know the elements of the crime. If the quote you posted is the “rock solid” proof you need....it is even more evident you don’t know what you don’t know. Stop playing lawyer. You are awful at it.
Posted by Tony Tiger89
EVERYWHERE
Member since Feb 2008
2861 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 8:01 am to
Good thing I'm not a liberal pussy boy, if I was I might give a frick what the liberal trash thinks about me!!
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124188 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 8:10 am to
quote:

I'd prefer to see the scumbag headed to spend the rest of his life in jail.
the rest of his life in jail?

Are you demented?
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 8:11 am to
quote:

No. You are a dishonest and ignorant useful idiot that doesn’t even know the elements of the crime. If the quote you posted is the “rock solid” proof you need....it is even more evident you don’t know what you don’t know. Stop playing lawyer. You are awful at it.




18 U.S. Code §?1512. Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant

(b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to—
(1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding;
(2) cause or induce any person to—
(A) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official proceeding;
(B) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding;
(C) evade legal process summoning that person to appear as a witness, or to produce a record, document, or other object, in an official proceeding; or
(D) be absent from an official proceeding to which such person has been summoned by legal process;

Pretty sure the indictment covers this at a minimum

Stone is looking for a technicality to excuse his criminal conduct. The idea that crimes like witness tampering/obstruction of justice depend on the investigation resulting in charges (or even on the veracity of the investigation) is insane. They are crimes because the conduct can materially impair an investigation

You don't get to burn your house down to prevent a thorough investigation -- that's a crime.
This post was edited on 6/18/19 at 9:01 am
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 8:14 am to
quote:

the rest of his life in jail?

Are you demented?


He's old. The sentence won't be that long.
Posted by Strannix
District 11
Member since Dec 2012
49028 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 8:17 am to
I am going to put you in a camp
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124188 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 8:22 am to
quote:

He's old. The sentence won't be that long.
Do you understand what the charges are?
Posted by tandrews37
Member since Jun 2019
721 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 8:23 am to
Let’s wait to see if you can even post in 2020.

I expect one of Stone or Flynn to be rotting in a cell with Cohen and Manafort by then.
Posted by Tony Tiger89
EVERYWHERE
Member since Feb 2008
2861 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 8:26 am to
Liberal alter pussy boy, your alter account will be gone , once all is said and done. Flynn will walk and Stone will walk, and your pussy arse will be using another account like most liberal vagina's on here do !!
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 8:58 am to
quote:

Do you understand what the charges are?


one count of obstruction of an official proceeding, five counts of false statements, and one count of witness tampering

Roger Stone acted corruptly to obstruct those investigations and his actions were capable of influencing the investigations. That is all the law requires. He gone.
This post was edited on 6/18/19 at 9:03 am
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 9:03 am to
quote:

Liberal alter pussy boy, your alter account will be gone , once all is said and done. Flynn will walk and Stone will walk, and your pussy arse will be using another account like most liberal vagina's on here do !!


Next level alter given we are on at the same time. Maybe its a burner phone.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48672 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 9:09 am to
quote:

Pretty sure the indictment covers this at a minimum


I bet you are pretty sure. And I’ll state again....you are really bad at playing lawyer. I’ll indulge, though. Is the quote you previously posted what you are relying upon to satisfy the elements above? Any other actions? I want to get it all out there before We look into the “rock solid” case.
Posted by tigersbb
Member since Oct 2012
10392 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 9:50 am to
No wonder they needed 30 officers in riot gear, a battering ram and, of course CNN for backup if Stone really got rough.
This post was edited on 6/18/19 at 9:53 am
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

I bet you are pretty sure. And I’ll state again....you are really bad at playing lawyer. I’ll indulge, though. Is the quote you previously posted what you are relying upon to satisfy the elements above? Any other actions? I want to get it all out there before We look into the “rock solid” case.


Or you could just reference the indictment
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram