- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Hypothetical: Roe v Wade is overturned today...
Posted on 5/15/19 at 9:44 am to Kracka
Posted on 5/15/19 at 9:44 am to Kracka
If you can't point to it in the Constitution and see where it's specifically enumerated as a power/responsibility of the federal government, then that's a 10A issue, no questions asked.
I see no "murder your baby" clause, so...
I see no "murder your baby" clause, so...
0
Posted on 5/15/19 at 9:47 am to roadGator
quote:
States should decide. Let all the abortion cult live together in harmony.
Support. State issue as far as I'm concerned
Posted on 5/15/19 at 9:48 am to Kracka
Even though I'm a huge opponent of Roe v Wade, I think the original ruling would pass in every state:
In the first trimester, the court declared, the right to abortion was absolute. In the second, states could regulate it to protect the mother’s health. In the third, states could restrict abortion in theory, but had to allow exceptions to protect the life or health of the mother, defined capaciously in the accompanying case of Doe v. Bolton to include “emotional, psychological, familial” considerations, as well as “the woman’s age.
Not my ideal, but I bet most of the country would go along with that. Too bad Blackmun completely screwed it up when writing the opinion.
In the first trimester, the court declared, the right to abortion was absolute. In the second, states could regulate it to protect the mother’s health. In the third, states could restrict abortion in theory, but had to allow exceptions to protect the life or health of the mother, defined capaciously in the accompanying case of Doe v. Bolton to include “emotional, psychological, familial” considerations, as well as “the woman’s age.
Not my ideal, but I bet most of the country would go along with that. Too bad Blackmun completely screwed it up when writing the opinion.
Posted on 5/15/19 at 9:50 am to Kracka
Instead of fireworks shops at the state lines, you'll have abortion clinics.
Posted on 5/15/19 at 9:51 am to Cosmo
quote:Until Republicans try to outlaw it at the federal level. But muh state rights goes bye bye.
Thats how it should be. States rights and all.
Posted on 5/15/19 at 9:53 am to BamaAtl
quote:
So some states will be under sharia law, and others won't?
So preventing the killing of innocent children is now akin to shari'a law?
Posted on 5/15/19 at 9:54 am to Kracka
Roe v. Wade overturn throws it back to the states. It would not ban abortion. The state legislatures would probably vote about 30 states legalizing and 20 states banning.
Posted on 5/15/19 at 9:54 am to mmcgrath
quote:
Until Republicans try to outlaw it at the federal level. But muh state rights goes bye bye.
Hypocrisy on an unfounded hypothetical.
Interesting debate tactic.
Posted on 5/15/19 at 9:56 am to Antonio Moss
They're such drama queens. Child sacrifice is just as en vogue today as it was back in the day. All they've done is change the venue from a rock on the side of a mountain to a PP "procedure" room.
Posted on 5/15/19 at 10:02 am to Kracka
It would be exactly what we are going through with Marijuana legislation. So no big deal really
Posted on 5/15/19 at 10:33 am to Cosmo
quote:
Thats how it should be. States rights and all.
So if a state votes to return to slavery you’re good with that?
Posted on 5/15/19 at 12:33 pm to anc
quote:
Why is killing babies so important to you?
Nobody's advocating killing babies. Except for Republicans who want to kill CHIP, obviously.
Posted on 5/15/19 at 12:47 pm to BamaAtl
makes this statement:
however you support abortion.
Are you stupid?
quote:
Nobody's advocating killing babies
however you support abortion.
Are you stupid?
Posted on 5/15/19 at 12:52 pm to civiltiger07
quote:
however you support abortion.
Correct. What part of that doesn't make sense to you?
Posted on 5/15/19 at 1:17 pm to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:
So if a state votes to return to slavery you’re good with that?
No dumbass, since the Constitution explicitly says that is illegal.
Anything not explicitly addressed by Constitution should be decided by states.
Posted on 5/15/19 at 2:47 pm to BamaAtl
So you agree that you are advocating for killing babies?
Posted on 5/15/19 at 2:48 pm to civiltiger07
quote:
So you agree that you are advocating for killing babies?
Of course I'm not. Who would advocate such a thing?
Posted on 5/15/19 at 2:50 pm to Cosmo
quote:Nah. You’d have to repeal Amendment XIV, and that’s never gonna be on the table.
Thats how it should be. States rights and all.
Posted on 5/15/19 at 2:56 pm to anc
quote:
Why is killing babies so important to you?
Why is killing school children so important to you?
Posted on 5/15/19 at 2:56 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
Of course I'm not. Who would advocate such a thing?
Someone that supports abortion?
Page 2 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News