Started By
Message

Should MLB lower the mound again?

Posted on 4/4/19 at 8:05 pm
Posted by UltimateHog
Oregon
Member since Dec 2011
65978 posts
Posted on 4/4/19 at 8:05 pm
Was considered/floated this winter to lower it again (was lowered in 1968 from 15" to 10").

Pitchers are dominating again early and doctors also believe it would reduce stress on the arm.

quote:

Some in the medical field contend that the raised elevation creates an extra stress on the pitcher's arm. Supporters of lowering the mound point out that the longevity of a pitching career has extended since dropping the mound from 15 inches to 10 inches, and that could be enhanced by an ever bigger drop in the elevation.
This post was edited on 4/4/19 at 8:14 pm
Posted by TechDawg2007
Bawville
Member since Nov 2007
32249 posts
Posted on 4/4/19 at 8:06 pm to
Thanks for fricking it up
Posted by LooseCannon22282
Mobile
Member since May 2008
33778 posts
Posted on 4/4/19 at 8:07 pm to
slight off topic but pitching has been strong early on into the season.

lotta strike outs.
Posted by UltimateHog
Oregon
Member since Dec 2011
65978 posts
Posted on 4/4/19 at 8:08 pm to
Yeah I support lowering the mound again.

Let's make it the topic since they lost no no instantly.
This post was edited on 4/4/19 at 8:12 pm
Posted by TheAstroTiger
Member since Jun 2018
3101 posts
Posted on 4/4/19 at 9:30 pm to
I love the game right now. Strikeouts and home runs are fun to me.
Posted by Bumble Bee
Northwest, La
Member since Jan 2011
754 posts
Posted on 4/5/19 at 2:44 am to
NO! These hitters need to learn how to hit and not just swing for the fences. That is why batting averages are so low and pitchers are dominating.

But hell, lets go ahead and weaken the defense in another sport because we want to dumb it down.
Posted by D011ahbi11
Member since Jun 2007
13628 posts
Posted on 4/5/19 at 2:55 am to
quote:

NO! These hitters need to learn how to hit and not just swing for the fences. That is why batting averages are so low and pitchers are dominating


So it has nothing to do with the rise in velocity?
Posted by Bumble Bee
Northwest, La
Member since Jan 2011
754 posts
Posted on 4/5/19 at 3:09 am to
quote:

So it has nothing to do with the rise in velocity?


Not saying that is not a factor in the increase in Ks, but I have watched baseball for over 25 years. I have seen a steady decline in the fundamentals. Ever since the HR race between Sosa and McGwire, the HR has taken on a whole new meaning in the game. We see very few guys trying to hit for average. Using the whole field, dropping down a bunt. Because that isn't sexy and will get them on ESPN. It's all about the HR. I mean that is also why there is talk about eliminating the "Shift" because hitters don't want to try to go the other way with the pitch.
Posted by hendersonshands
Univ. of Louisiana Ragin Cajuns
Member since Oct 2007
160105 posts
Posted on 4/5/19 at 4:43 am to
People figured out that OPS is a way better indicator of a good offense than batting average.
Posted by Bumble Bee
Northwest, La
Member since Jan 2011
754 posts
Posted on 4/5/19 at 4:52 am to
You do realize, if batters lean to actually hit for average, with power, that OPS will increase.
Posted by McCaigBro69
TigerDroppings Premium Member
Member since Oct 2014
45094 posts
Posted on 4/5/19 at 5:56 am to
quote:

Pitchers are dominating again early


Rangers have one quality start this season and have had three thrown against them.

I've seen nothing but shitty pitching.
Posted by D011ahbi11
Member since Jun 2007
13628 posts
Posted on 4/5/19 at 5:59 am to
Batting average is down from 25 years ago but the runs per game isn’t much different. Go look at runs per game from pre steroid era. Lower than now.
Joey Gallo doesn’t have a job in the MLB if he’s out there trying to hit for average and go to all fields.
Posted by McCaigBro69
TigerDroppings Premium Member
Member since Oct 2014
45094 posts
Posted on 4/5/19 at 6:02 am to
quote:

batters lean to actually hit for average, with power


How many contact hitters are slapping 25-30 bombs a year?

It's just like the NBA and the emphasis on guard play and threes....it's much more efficient and successful if you can build a team that scores more and at a faster pace.

A batter that goes 1-4 with a solo home-run with two outs is much more significant to the outcome than a guy that can hit three singles with no one on base with two-outs in the same game.

Obviously having a balanced lineup is ideal, but there aren't enough decent players to build the ideal, balanced lineup on multiple teams.
Posted by McCaigBro69
TigerDroppings Premium Member
Member since Oct 2014
45094 posts
Posted on 4/5/19 at 6:09 am to
quote:

Joey Gallo doesn’t have a job in the MLB if he’s out there trying to hit for average and go to all fields.


Well some teams somewhat considered him as a possible pitcher out of high school. He could throw 99 mph.

Posted by hendersonshands
Univ. of Louisiana Ragin Cajuns
Member since Oct 2007
160105 posts
Posted on 4/5/19 at 6:10 am to
I'm sure everybody would love to be Mike Trout.
Posted by Melvin Spellvin
proud dad of 2 A&M honor grads
Member since Jul 2015
1676 posts
Posted on 4/5/19 at 6:13 am to
at the end of the day, this is all about the money boys, more scoring and more HRs puts more butts in the seats to spend dat money...
This post was edited on 4/5/19 at 6:15 am
Posted by D011ahbi11
Member since Jun 2007
13628 posts
Posted on 4/5/19 at 6:27 am to
quote:

Well some teams somewhat considered him as a possible pitcher out of high school. He could throw 99 mph


I think you know what I meant. He doesn’t have a job as a hitter...
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 4/5/19 at 6:31 am to
Historically speaking, the average number of total runs per game hovers around 10. What if every year the average dipped below 10, the mound lowered an inch, and every year it goes above 10, the mound raised an inch?
Posted by slinger1317
Northshore
Member since Sep 2005
5901 posts
Posted on 4/5/19 at 6:37 am to
quote:

longevity of a pitching career has extended


This probably has more to do with the modern practice of limiting starting pitchers' innings than the mound height.
Posted by McCaigBro69
TigerDroppings Premium Member
Member since Oct 2014
45094 posts
Posted on 4/5/19 at 7:13 am to
quote:

I think you know what I meant. He doesn’t have a job as a hitter...


Lol yes.

If baseball was decided by hits instead of runs he would be almost worthless.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram