- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Did Obama, Brennan And Clinton Illegally Collude To Take Trump Down?
Posted on 3/25/19 at 9:58 pm
Posted on 3/25/19 at 9:58 pm
ETA: The title of the OP is the title of the linked article
This article is from 7/23/2018. The editors point to a comment Clapper made on CNN as evidence Obama was behind the fake dossier and connect some dots. Your boy will go down, leftist, when it’s all said and done.
LINK
This article is from 7/23/2018. The editors point to a comment Clapper made on CNN as evidence Obama was behind the fake dossier and connect some dots. Your boy will go down, leftist, when it’s all said and done.
quote:
Here's what Obama's Director of National Intelligence, the nation's former spy master, James Clapper, told CNN's Anderson Cooper:
"If it weren't for President Obama we might not have done the intelligence community assessment that we did that set up a whole sequence of event which are still unfolding today, including Special Counsel (Robert) Mueller's investigation. President Obama is responsible for that. It was he who tasked us to do that intelligence community assessment in the first place."
quote:
Give Hillary credit: She was adept at insinuating her phony oppo research document into the public record and at using it to weaponize U.S. intelligence agencies on behalf of her failed campaign.
But then, we all knew this had happened. What's stunning is the casual way Clapper let us know that President Obama "was responsible" for the whole shebang.
If that's so, there are really only two possibilities:
One, that a gullible Obama was fed phony information from Brennan and the Hillary Clinton campaign. He then over-reacted by tasking the intelligence community to look into it.
Or, two, that Obama knew he was dealing with tainted information. Instead of halting a bogus investigation, he let Brennan carry it forward. Why? He thought it would help elect Hillary Clinton — and cement his own presidential legacy for posterity.
At a minimum, what seems obvious is that the deep state triad of Obama, Clinton and Brennan colluded. They did it to damage Trump's campaign with allegations of Russian interference in the election. And they got the FBI and, later, a special prosecutor, to conduct a high-profile investigation.
LINK
This post was edited on 3/25/19 at 10:19 pm
Posted on 3/25/19 at 10:11 pm to Bourre
quote:
Obama knew he was dealing with tainted information. Instead of halting a bogus investigation, he let Brennan carry it forward. Why? He thought it would help elect Hillary Clinton — and cement his own presidential legacy for posterity.
I think it’s something more sinister than “cementing his legacy”.
If Hillary didn’t win, there was a chance she was going down, legally. And if she went down legally, she wasn’t going down alone. Therefore, Hillary had to win.
I honestly believe that clandestine WJC/Loretta Lynch meeting on the tarmac was the means of conveying that exact message to Obama: if Hillary went down, she was taking Obama with her.
Posted on 3/25/19 at 10:14 pm to Bourre
Obama is a stooge or a traitor.
Those are the only choices at this point. He should hang for the latter.
Those are the only choices at this point. He should hang for the latter.
Posted on 3/25/19 at 10:24 pm to Bourre
How do we know if any of this was done “illegally” though?
This might fall under “unethical” or not in line with protocol, but is it “illegal”? What exactly is illegal here?
This might fall under “unethical” or not in line with protocol, but is it “illegal”? What exactly is illegal here?
Posted on 3/25/19 at 10:26 pm to TOKEN
quote:
How do we know if any of this was done “illegally” though?
This might fall under “unethical” or not in line with protocol, but is it “illegal”? What exactly is illegal here?
You must be dizzy with all that spinning
Posted on 3/25/19 at 10:27 pm to Bourre
I hope we get a definitive answer one way or the other.
Posted on 3/25/19 at 10:29 pm to TOKEN
quote:
What exactly is illegal here?
For starters, knowingly submitting fraudulent information to he FISA court is a felony. Lets start there.
Posted on 3/25/19 at 10:31 pm to WizardSleeve
quote:
For starters, knowingly submitting fraudulent information to he FISA court is a felony. Lets start there.
Who knowingly sent this info? Comey?
This post was edited on 3/25/19 at 10:32 pm
Posted on 3/25/19 at 10:31 pm to WizardSleeve
Conspiracy to commit a fraud upon the country and to bring down a legally elected President.
Basically, a sedition conspiracy.
Basically, a sedition conspiracy.
This post was edited on 3/25/19 at 10:32 pm
Posted on 3/25/19 at 10:32 pm to TOKEN
quote:
Who knowingly sent this info? Comey?
Go frick yourself you fricking piece of Lib Trash shite.
Posted on 3/25/19 at 10:32 pm to Malik Agar
quote:
You must be dizzy with all that spinning
I get that you don’t know anything. Just, sit on the sideline next time instead of running interference.
Posted on 3/25/19 at 10:33 pm to Armchair_QB
quote:
Go frick yourself you fricking piece of Lib Trash shite.
Learn to Code
Posted on 3/25/19 at 10:34 pm to TOKEN
quote:
How do we know if any of this was done “illegally” though?
That’s what an investigation is for. The point of the op was to remind the board that Clapper already spilled the beans on who authorized the assessment
This post was edited on 3/25/19 at 10:35 pm
Posted on 3/25/19 at 10:40 pm to TOKEN
quote:
Who knowingly sent this info? Comey?
I believe Sally Yates signature was on the original FISA doc, then Comey and RR.
That signature - they are basically testifying that the information they submit is correct, accurate, and verified, AND no other info is being withheld.
We now know that the info was incorrect, inaccurate, unverified, AND important evidence was withheld. 4 times
So. Someone goes to jail. It’s just a matter of who.
This post was edited on 3/25/19 at 10:42 pm
Posted on 3/25/19 at 10:43 pm to Bourre
Yes, but don't forget Comey and Loretta Lynch.
Posted on 3/25/19 at 10:43 pm to BobBoucher
quote:
I believe Sally Yates signature was on the original FISA doc, then Comey and RR.
That signature - they are basically testifying that the information they submit is correct, accurate, and verified, AND no other info is being withheld. 4 times.
We now know that the info was incorrect, inaccurate, unverified, AND important evidence was withheld.
So. Someone goes to jail. It’s just a matter of who.
Aw thanks that’s what I was getting at. Comey knew where the dossier came from and so did Yates apparently?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News