Started By
Message

re: We have ethanol because farmers in Iowa want your money

Posted on 3/11/19 at 2:19 pm to
Posted by cajuncarguy
On the road...Again!
Member since Jun 2013
3135 posts
Posted on 3/11/19 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

Why so much hate for farmers? You do realize the blenders are the ones that are recieving tax credits,right?


The blenders use that tax credit to artificially raise the value of corn to the farmers. It's the farmers who have all the votes, not the blenders. They are almost as good as the Sugar League except the sugar mills/farmers don't get direct tax credits they get a price this is many many times higher than the world price/value of sugar.

If I don't like the price of sugar I don't buy it. I don't have that choice in gasoline except a few places that sell non ethanol gas. But it cost more so any extra MPG usually doesn't pay for itself.

Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101891 posts
Posted on 3/11/19 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

And having the Iowa caucus first ensures they'll continue to get it.


This is just stupid at this point, as well. The Iowa Caucus is really not much of a bellwether at all anymore.

The last three Republican winners have been Mike Huckabee, Rick Santorum, and Ted Cruz.
Posted by Ebbandflow
Member since Aug 2010
13457 posts
Posted on 3/11/19 at 4:19 pm to
quote:

If they were in "public" run prisons you think that would be cheaper and not cost more per prisoner?


I don't see how it would be more expensive. And don't give me that vague BS about how all government-run things cost more than businesses that are taking profits. It's also ludicrous that you could defend something like that considering our tax dollars pay for it and that it's a very scary conflict of interest when a business profits more from more people being locked up.

quote:

Well, it would be a problem if they wrote laws and enforced those laws. But those functions are filled by public servants


Public servants that can be bought off by a privatize industry money. If it was a public run prison there would be no incentive to do that
Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
20738 posts
Posted on 3/11/19 at 6:45 pm to
quote:

They started putting that shite in our food and it's way worse than sugar.




I wish gullible people would stop getting their news from facebook. It makes them even dumber.

It's almost exactly the same as sugar. In fact, the HFCS used in processed food has significantly less fructose than sugar.
This post was edited on 3/11/19 at 6:51 pm
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
27170 posts
Posted on 3/11/19 at 6:49 pm to
I’ve never been able to figure out how or why Iowa managed to make itself so important to the primary process. But whatever it was they did to make it happen, it made them a fortune.
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
40233 posts
Posted on 3/11/19 at 6:52 pm to
quote:

We have ethanol because farmers in Iowa want your money


The rent from my family's farm that farms corn in Louisiana is paying off my medical school loans. Thank you for your money.









































Politics and special interests are never gonna change. I am going to get mine while the getting is good.
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
40233 posts
Posted on 3/11/19 at 7:14 pm to
quote:

They started putting that shite in our food and it's way worse than sugar.
It's exactly equally bad as sugar.


No it is worse than sucrose (aka cane sugar or regular sugar). HFCS tricks the body into thinking it is sucrose, but during metabolism it gets bypasses the key regulatory step of glycolysis and it gets broken down straight into fat instead of being burned in glycolysis, the TCA cycle, and oxidative phosphorylation. Since it tricks the body into thinking that it is glucose it causes insulin to be released from the pancreas, but it is not glucose so the glucose transporters in adipose and muscle tissue that get activated by insulin do not take it up. This eventually causes those glucose transporters to down-regulate themselves and lose sensitivity to insulin. That means that the body needs more insulin to control blood sugar and that is the basis for insulin resistance aka type II diabetes mellitus.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89765 posts
Posted on 3/11/19 at 7:43 pm to
quote:

If it was a public run prison there would be no incentive to do that


You're completely unhinged and incapable of debating this on merits.

quote:

I don't see how it would be more expensive.


You ever wonder how a toilet on a bomber costs $23,000?

quote:

And don't give me that vague BS about how all government-run things cost more than businesses that are taking profits.


Generally - anything that can be run by business for a profit will be better run than anything else. I get that you can't delegate all government functions to private sector - but a prison is one of those things. There is no reasonable danger for a conflict when these people cannot make laws or arrest people.

This is like saying that there is no reason to allow folks on welfare benefits to vote, because of inherent conflict of interests. Surely you don't agree with such an absurd proposition, do you?
Posted by highcotton2
Alabama
Member since Feb 2010
9476 posts
Posted on 3/11/19 at 9:06 pm to
quote:

The best whiskey is distilled from small nice heirloom corn growers located in Kentucky, Tennessee and Canada. Most whiskey makers do not use the GMO corn


Wrong. Which brands do you think do not use GMO? Because I personally know of a few who used to advertise this that I have personally sold to like Buffalo Trace, Jim Beam, Jack Daniels and Four Roses.
Posted by Ebbandflow
Member since Aug 2010
13457 posts
Posted on 3/11/19 at 10:06 pm to
quote:

You're completely unhinged and incapable of debating this on merits.


Says the guy that completely avoided the debate all together. Attempting to discredit me without providing any substance isn't going to help you.

quote:

You ever wonder how a toilet on a bomber costs $23,000?


So you want to talk about military industrial complex expenditures now? That's another thing Republicans love to do... spend a bunch of our taxpayer dollars helping out weapons contractors. I know that's not the point you were going for but you failed miserably.

You still haven't approached the subject at all. It is morally reprehensible to put so many people in prison when it benefits the pocketbook of a specific few using our tax dollars. I don't think you understand how corrupt the Republican privatization movement actually is.

quote:

Generally - anything that can be run by business for a profit will be better run than anything else. I


Do you really think prisons should be a business? I think you keep avoiding that argument and I'm not sure why.

quote:

This is like saying that there is no reason to allow folks on welfare benefits to vote, because of inherent conflict of interests. Surely you don't agree with such an absurd proposition, do you?


I'm sorry but that's just not a very good point. People who are wealthy thought to lower their taxes too. See how slanted your point of view actually is?
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89765 posts
Posted on 3/11/19 at 10:25 pm to
quote:

Says the guy that completely avoided the debate all together.


Well, the thread is about ethanol subsidies. You wanted to talk about "for profit" prisons, implying that because they're for profit, the operators *somehow* write laws and arrest/imprison people. We've tried to explain to you how they don't have those powers. They're just vendors.

You would have a point if cops were paid a bonus for every person they arrested. Or the judges for every person they found guilty. Etc.

quote:

So you want to talk about military industrial complex expenditures now?


Okay - so you think it is the contractor that specs out the toilet to $23000, or the "Good Idea Fairy" run amok in the procurement process that results in such ludicrous expenditures? I get that contractors want to make money and there probably is too cozy a relationship between contractors and the Pentagon.

quote:

You still haven't approached the subject at all.


I absolutely have. If you arrest, prosecute and sentence someone to jail time (ALL DONE BY CIVIL SERVANTS), then they have to serve time somewhere. If a contractor can do so for $X per day and that is cheaper than doing it with civil servants, then I don't see the problem.

Your problem seems to be with the criminal justice system. Your points have nothing to do with this thread on ethanol subsidies. That's like comparing apples to plutonium.



Posted by Ebbandflow
Member since Aug 2010
13457 posts
Posted on 3/11/19 at 10:59 pm to
quote:

Ethanol is a boondoggle as much as the kooky, left wing ideas that solar and wind can provide our power needs in the foreseeable future (like within 50 or 60 years, which is nonsense). 

And, ethanol has the added burden of increasing costs of car ownership and actual toxic pollution (not the mythical CO2 boogeyman of the AGW folks, which is not a pollutant at all.) 


You are such an incredible shill and you are blind to it. Was it liberal fantasies that caused oil companies to buy up patents over the years that could have helped with renewable energy? You and others like you in this thread are trying to make it seem like it's some left-wing conspiracy to rob us of our dollars when the oil and gas industry has had his bent over a barrel for a hundred years.

Corn is incredibly easy to grow and there's always a surplus. I don't really believe ethanol is the answer but for you to sit here and act like it's some scam when Republican oil men have been robbing us blind for years.... well its very telling.

quote:

I get that contractors want to make money and there probably is too cozy a relationship between contractors and the Pentagon.


So you accept this but not this:

quote:

You wanted to talk about "for profit" prisons, implying that because they're for profit, the operators *somehow* write laws and arrest/imprison people. We've tried to explain to you how they don't have those powers. They're just vendors.


First off first off it's really disconcerting that you think businesses should be vendors over other people's freedom and livelihood. Secondly, you're woefully naive if you dont think that lobbyists exist for this very reason or that cash payments couldnt be made under the table. There have been several judges arrested in the last 5 years for taking cash payments to incarcerate more people. Private Industry should not be involved in certain things and definitely not freedom and livelihood of people. Not to mention that it cost the taxpayer more money because they're gaining profits.

quote:

Or the judges for every person they found guilty. Etc.


It does actually happen. It's pretty obvious that the Republican Party and its voters do not care about adult humans and definitely don't care about lining their pockets at the expense of others. Not to mention that you guys always act like the government is so oppressive but want the most potentially corrupt imprisonment situation.

The way that you think shows a complete lack of self-awareness and someone as intelligent as you should know better.

quote:

If a contractor can do so for $X per day and that is cheaper than doing it with civil servants, then I don't see the problem.


That's a big assumption you're making. In my experience, Republicans love to privatize things and help their buddies make more money at the expense of the taxpayer. What I see is lobbyists who have influenced mostly right-wing politicians enter private sizing something that holds human lives in the balance and does it at the taxpayers expense. For you just to assume that it's being run cheaper is blindly loyal to Your Puppet Masters.

Posted by texag7
College Station
Member since Apr 2014
37637 posts
Posted on 3/11/19 at 11:05 pm to
quote:

when Republican oil men have been robbing us blind for years....


robbing who? nobody is making you drive a car.

If you don’t like gas prices get a bike or make your own refinery
Posted by Ebbandflow
Member since Aug 2010
13457 posts
Posted on 3/11/19 at 11:13 pm to
quote:

robbing who? nobody is making you drive a car.

If you don’t like gas prices get a bike or make your own refinery



They've been eliminating the competition since Rockefeller. They slow down down progress because it hurts their bottom line. Then they brainwash people like you to defend them
Posted by ClampClampington
Nebraska
Member since Jun 2017
3968 posts
Posted on 3/11/19 at 11:39 pm to
The blender credits encourage blending a cheaper, American fuel. Ethanol exports have grown year over year for several years. You may not like the product, but other countries are asking for it. I don’t agree with the credits, ethanol can stand on its own (with some contraction). But it is a legit industry.
Corn growers sell to their best market, which happens to be end users, often ethanol plants which are not subsisidized anymore
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
30676 posts
Posted on 3/11/19 at 11:44 pm to
THink about it.

Cruz won Iowa.

He went to these primaries and argued against the gov mandate for eth in fuel. He offered better options for ethanol in ethanol-friendly combust fuel engines, but wanted free market to determine it.


Trump can do the same thing.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89765 posts
Posted on 3/12/19 at 1:35 am to
quote:

Corn is incredibly easy to grow and there's always a surplus.


Requires fossil fuels to grow and is only economically feasible with subsidies.

This is a policy pushed by CONSERVATIVE POLITICIANS in RED STATES. I'm a registered independent, baw, so point the dirty end of the stick in another direction.

quote:

First off first off it's really disconcerting that you think businesses should be vendors over other people's freedom and livelihood.


No. I'm saying I worked around jails. My father worked in a jail. I DGAF about inmates. If a private business can do it cheaper, there is literally zero wrong with them doing the work, especially low and medium security types.

If you want to talk about CJ reform - particularly easing of penalties/decriminalization of marijuana, I'm all ears. But this laser like focus on what you perceive is the inherent evil in private, for profit prisons is stultifying. Most folks have zero problem with it.

quote:

There have been several judges arrested in the last 5 years for taking cash payments to incarcerate more people.


So, you're saying there is oversight? Outstanding. Also, have you got a link for these facts?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram