- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Would you trade for Josh Rosen?
Posted on 3/4/19 at 2:05 pm
Posted on 3/4/19 at 2:05 pm
If Cards take Murry would you trade for Rosen?
Pros- 1) ridiculously low salary next 2 yrs (since his bonus is paid by AZ something roughly around 1.5-2 would be what's due next 3 years ).
2) potentially solves Brees issue for maybe next years 1st ( obtaining a high draft pick would cost a ton to get into top 5-10 to get a shot at next year's qbs
3) good upside and he will have experience as opposed to rookie
Cons - dude is a known prick
Pros- 1) ridiculously low salary next 2 yrs (since his bonus is paid by AZ something roughly around 1.5-2 would be what's due next 3 years ).
2) potentially solves Brees issue for maybe next years 1st ( obtaining a high draft pick would cost a ton to get into top 5-10 to get a shot at next year's qbs
3) good upside and he will have experience as opposed to rookie
Cons - dude is a known prick
Posted on 3/4/19 at 2:07 pm to GEAUXTIGER23
If we can get him for next years third sure. But I don't think at this point anything higher will be worth it.
Posted on 3/4/19 at 2:13 pm to Lester Earl
I think so as well. What would you trade? I'd give next year's 1 and 3. A Brees' replacement will be a minimum of probably 2 1s to just get up there or overpaying a free agent $20 mill a year or more.
Posted on 3/4/19 at 2:21 pm to GEAUXTIGER23
No way I’d trade a 1 and 3 for Rosen..a 3 sure, well maybe..dude ain’t a leader, I don’t care how good his arm is
Posted on 3/4/19 at 2:33 pm to GEAUXTIGER23
I have been reading that the Cards are going to keep him. I think the Pats would be in play if they are thinking about trading him.
Posted on 3/4/19 at 2:34 pm to GEAUXTIGER23
Nope, they will get raped and will accept it..
Why in hell should we give up a 1st for a QB they gave up on after a year .... to draft a qb?
Lol take this 3rd or nothing
Why in hell should we give up a 1st for a QB they gave up on after a year .... to draft a qb?
Lol take this 3rd or nothing
Posted on 3/4/19 at 2:43 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
Absolutely
This.
now WHAT exactly we trade is anybody's guess. But If we could somehow get him for the late second and have FOUR years of rookie deal I'd take it in a heartbeat. The guy is a prick but he's not dumb, he should be able to learn from Brees in his final years.
Posted on 3/4/19 at 2:45 pm to GEAUXTIGER23
Rosen looked and played terrible last year
no way in hell he is worth a 1st or 2nd rounder and Arizona knows it which is why they want to move on.
If he wasnt drafted 10th overall would anyone even think a 3rd was justifiable? The acquisition would solely be based on upside that has not shown up anywhere on a NFL field to date
You can not sugar coat
55.2% Completion
2,278 Yards
11 TDs
14 INTs
10 Fumbles
45 Sacks
66.7 QBR
no way in hell he is worth a 1st or 2nd rounder and Arizona knows it which is why they want to move on.
If he wasnt drafted 10th overall would anyone even think a 3rd was justifiable? The acquisition would solely be based on upside that has not shown up anywhere on a NFL field to date
You can not sugar coat
55.2% Completion
2,278 Yards
11 TDs
14 INTs
10 Fumbles
45 Sacks
66.7 QBR
Posted on 3/4/19 at 2:51 pm to GEAUXTIGER23
there will be no "hot" QB coming for the saints
hill is your backup and insurance policy for the next 3 years at least and if we are lucky, he might begin to emerge as a true starting QB prospect.
he has talent and skill if he can get there mentally
i think his biggest weakness/negative right now is the ability to make fast decisive reads during plays to go through his progressions
the saints bring in a QB its going to be for a #3 backup role
hill is your backup and insurance policy for the next 3 years at least and if we are lucky, he might begin to emerge as a true starting QB prospect.
he has talent and skill if he can get there mentally
i think his biggest weakness/negative right now is the ability to make fast decisive reads during plays to go through his progressions
the saints bring in a QB its going to be for a #3 backup role
This post was edited on 3/4/19 at 2:52 pm
Posted on 3/4/19 at 2:51 pm to GEAUXTIGER23
Nope. Taysom hill is better than Josh Rosen and it's not even close.
Posted on 3/4/19 at 2:53 pm to jkylejohnson
Taysom Hill is notnthe future QB. He’s a nice situational player, he’s not what you want at QB
Posted on 3/4/19 at 2:54 pm to partywiththelombardi
quote:
You can not sugar coat
55.2% Completion
2,278 Yards
11 TDs
14 INTs
10 Fumbles
45 Sacks
66.7 QBR
Pretty similar to Drew's stats from his 3rd year in the league. The Cardinals had nothing but Fitz on his last legs and a ruined David Johnson.
Posted on 3/4/19 at 2:54 pm to GEAUXTIGER23
Hell no dude is an outspoken leftist. Might ruin my Saints fanhood if he is starting QB and speaking out against TRUMP during the 2020 season.
:format(png)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/49284581/Screen_Shot_2016-04-11_at_10.07.26_AM.0.0.png)
This post was edited on 3/4/19 at 3:10 pm
Posted on 3/4/19 at 3:04 pm to saintsfan22
quote:
Pretty similar to Drew's stats from his 3rd year in the league. The Cardinals had nothing but Fitz on his last legs and a ruined David Johnson.
They also had Christian kirk.
The issue is the OL is arse.
Posted on 3/4/19 at 3:05 pm to CocoLoco
Taysom is great but I agree that he's not the future. Josh Rosen is not either though. If Brees went down in a game (God forbid) I'd feel better about our chances with Hill than Josh Rosen though. People can argue all day about his " bad situation " in zona but the dude just sucks.
Posted on 3/4/19 at 3:08 pm to htran90
quote:
They also had Christian kirk.
The issue is the OL is arse.
Kirk was a pretty good rookie but if he's supposed to be a big factor for them as a rookie that's an issue. And yes, the OL is trash too.
Posted on 3/4/19 at 3:37 pm to jkylejohnson
quote:
Nope. Taysom hill is better than Josh Rosen and it's not even close.
This board always delivers
Posted on 3/4/19 at 3:39 pm to jkylejohnson
Taysom is much better than Rosen in terms of palability to my fandom
This post was edited on 3/4/19 at 3:40 pm
Popular
Back to top

19






