Started By
Message

re: How can the NBA create more parity among its teams?

Posted on 2/19/19 at 5:39 pm to
Posted by stapuffmarshy
lower 9
Member since Apr 2010
17507 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 5:39 pm to
Contraction
Posted by BreakawayZou83
Kansas City, Missouri
Member since Oct 2011
9538 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 8:55 pm to
1. Stop rewarding tanking.
2. Punish players for holding teams hostage (see current AD situation). You sign a contract, you play or GTFO.
This post was edited on 2/19/19 at 8:56 pm
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
65531 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 8:59 pm to
quote:

Watching how upset you are about what your leHero started is pathetic.


if you think Lebron invented the "super team" model
Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
45251 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 9:04 pm to
quote:

Big Hairy Thought: Contract down to 24 teams.


24 may not even be enough. 18-20 seems like the right number.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111300 posts
Posted on 2/19/19 at 10:44 pm to
quote:

Shel has the first two steps right. Third step would be a huge step in the wrong direction.
Why is that?
Posted by BoardReader
Arkansas
Member since Dec 2007
6939 posts
Posted on 2/20/19 at 8:10 am to
A lot of interesting ideas, but most of them are either impossible due to the CBA, or self-defeating.

Contraction isn't going to happen. That's not even a good idea. The league has a perfectly good number of teams, and is likely to expand in the next decade or so. You aren't flushing the volume of product you put on the floor, for purposes of trying to artificially generate competitiveness.

Hard caps have been a goal for a while, but the union has shot them down consistently.

Realistically, they can do some measured things to improve resignability for players in drafted markets; they can make Bird rights/players untradeable for a number of years after signing-- you want that big resigning deal, you have to stay in town. They can pitch it to the union as security-- you sign your higher value supermax deal, and you are both tethered together-- the team has an inventive to build around you, and you get more money.

They could increase the penalty on repeat violators of the Salary Cap, for non-franchise drafted Supermax players-- say you draft 2 Supermax quality guys-- you did a good job, your franchise should be rewarded. You acquire them through FA? Pay through the nose for them in luxury tax dollars. You can't buy your way to a championship or have a sustainable model built around a Durant/LeBron fleeing to a better situation model.

Posted by RogerTempleton
Austin
Member since Nov 2014
3039 posts
Posted on 2/20/19 at 11:03 pm to
quote:

most money
Posted by Ghazi
Dallas Mavs 2011 NBA Champions
Member since Dec 2007
16121 posts
Posted on 2/21/19 at 1:35 am to
Parity is difficult in such a superstar oriented sport.


Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
9869 posts
Posted on 2/21/19 at 3:26 am to
The hard cap would be great. One way to make this more appealing is to allow each team one exception, as in one player that doesn't count against the cap. Also, I'd love for them to cap contracts at 3 years..
Posted by ThanosIsADemocrat
The Garden
Member since May 2018
9395 posts
Posted on 2/21/19 at 5:30 am to
quote:

Simple - Contraction


Why would the NBA contract when their talent pool is growing?

Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
35066 posts
Posted on 2/21/19 at 9:09 am to
quote:

5 game series in round 1 were awesome


What about the 3-game mini-series, circa early 80s?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram