- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
So what happens if the next president decides to declare a national emergency on guns?
Posted on 2/14/19 at 5:54 pm
Posted on 2/14/19 at 5:54 pm
I don’t like this. Opens the doors to too many possibilities. We don’t live in a dictatorship, if the president can’t get it through Congress then tough shite it just doesn’t get done. I have no problem with a wall, I just have a problem with opening Pandora’s box with this national emergency crap. It can and will be used to get more than just a wall.
50
Posted on 2/14/19 at 5:56 pm to DavidTheGnome
Were you late in getting the talking points?
Posted on 2/14/19 at 5:56 pm to DavidTheGnome
2A explicitly prevents it. There is no law that explicitly prevents a border wall.
/thread.
/thread.
Posted on 2/14/19 at 5:56 pm to DavidTheGnome
And what would they do about a national gun emergency?
Posted on 2/14/19 at 5:56 pm to DavidTheGnome
Well, our guns have the protection of the 2nd amendment. Border walls don't have that protection.
Posted on 2/14/19 at 5:57 pm to DavidTheGnome
The gun thing makes no sense because of the constitution and shite. Also the guns and shite.
But I don’t like it either.
But I don’t like it either.
Posted on 2/14/19 at 5:57 pm to Janky
Just saw that his happened, sorry if I haven’t kept up all day. So what’s the answer to the real problem that this will be used by future presidents to get whatever hey want? Saying "melt"?
Posted on 2/14/19 at 5:58 pm to BFIV
quote:Forget the 2nd Amendment. It’s just a piece of paper. But you can use your guns as you see fit.
Well, our guns have the protection of the 2nd amendment.
Posted on 2/14/19 at 5:58 pm to DavidTheGnome
I pray a liberal tries that.
Posted on 2/14/19 at 5:58 pm to DavidTheGnome
They can come try to take them. Law enforcement won't do it. They are being attacked too by this. I think New Jersey passed recently that off duty cops can't carry and it's not resonating well within the LEO community.
Posted on 2/14/19 at 5:59 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
So what happens if the next president decides to declare a national emergency on guns?
To do what about guns? No emergency declaration is going to upend an individual civil right. Should be patently obvious but you aren't exactly the brightest bulb.
Posted on 2/14/19 at 5:59 pm to DavidTheGnome
What part of “SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED” do you not understand?
Posted on 2/14/19 at 5:59 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
Just saw that his happened, sorry if I haven’t kept up all day. So what’s the answer to the real problem that this will be used by future presidents to get whatever hey want? Saying "melt"?
You think this is the first time a national emergency has been used?
Posted on 2/14/19 at 6:00 pm to DavidTheGnome
Not these dumbarse threads again
Posted on 2/14/19 at 6:02 pm to BobBoucher
quote:
2A explicitly prevents it
Cucks just dont get this fact . Blah Blah Blah , emergency take guns . Nancy has iron balls tea bagging Trump blah blah blah . The matrix has a hellva grip on some .
This post was edited on 2/14/19 at 6:03 pm
Posted on 2/14/19 at 6:05 pm to DavidTheGnome
The first duty of the POTUS is to protect the American citizens. He is doing this
Posted on 2/14/19 at 6:05 pm to DavidTheGnome
Anyone who denies that the border situation is a national emergency needs their head examined. The cost of illegal immigration is equivalent to hurricane Katrina - every single year. Narco terrorism, human trafficking, sexual abuse, and a half million apprehended annually. We have a shadow population living among us the size of Belgium. To call it a national emergency would be an understatement.
Posted on 2/14/19 at 6:05 pm to DavidTheGnome
good concern troll.
there is a huge difference in securing our borders and some crazy dem declaring guns banned.
there is a huge difference in securing our borders and some crazy dem declaring guns banned.
Posted on 2/14/19 at 6:06 pm to DreauxB2015
When they say we aren’t infringing on your right to bear arms, you can still have guns. Just not certain kinds. And this is an emergency so I’m circumventing congress to get it. Y’all will be thinking crap how could his happen.
The president circumventing congress to get his way. Muh small government amirite?
The president circumventing congress to get his way. Muh small government amirite?
This post was edited on 2/14/19 at 6:07 pm
Posted on 2/14/19 at 6:06 pm to Janky
quote:
You think this is the first time a national emergency has been used?
Not only does he think that, he apparently thinks democrats require "precedent" to do whatever they want.
What a hoot.
If they wanted to do something in the future they would use the fact that Trump merely considered it as "precedent".
shite, they tried to turn possible random thoughts he had about what he might do into "obstruction".
People have the memory of a fricking gnat.
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News