Kentucky's argument about the need for a GT rule is not valid (I think)

They said during the broadcast that the only thing that was reviewable was the clock.

If the NCAA implemented it like the other ones, it'd probably just be reviewable in the last 2:00 of each half... But I don't think there's a stipulation in the NBA (not sure, I'm not as well versed in NBA rules) that it has to be called GT to be reviewed, I'm pretty sure I've seen non-calls be turned into calls

Kentucky (and ESPN) need to suck it up and move on.

This isn't Saints-Rams, Kentucky plays this weekend. This didn't end their season.
"oh, but it could affect seeding!"; also bullcrap. We're talking about #5 being played to the wire at home by #19. Worst case scenario for LSU, the basket is disallowed and we go to OT, and maybe Kentucky wins in that (maybe LSU does). So even with that, #5 still gets pushed into OT at home by #19.
All the seeding that gets changed, is that LSU with a great record probably gets a lot more respect now.

Kentucky plays #1 this weekend. Win that game, overall respect will go up, lose and overall respect will go down. The LSU game doesn't affect that.

Piss on Kentucky fans and Kentucky in general. If you listened to their post game show it was non-stop whining and complaining. Most said LSU was not as good a team as Ky but LSU was just a
"Matchup problem" for their players.

Kentucky has been the beneficiary of many calls going their way over the years to the point that they expect it.

The tip-in was called good by all officials at the game as no one called a goal tend. Then both TV announcers called the shot good after watching the replay.

I have seen MANY tip-ins like the one last night and even closer and they were never questioned. However, none were at the buzzer at Rupp Arena costing Ky a loss. This one did and it stands. Let 'em bitch and cry.

The NBA does have rules in place that could be used similarly here. For instance, you can review a blocking call if there is a question as to whether or not the player was in the restricted area. During that review, you are able to overturn the block if; 1. The defender was in the restricted area, or 2. The player was not in legal guarding position.

So, you could state it to where offensive interference/goaltending can be overturned when looking to see if the shot went up in time.

However, that is not the case as of now, so that dub will remain a dub. The NCAA can change whatever rules it likes after the fact

Who would initiate the review. None of the three referees called goaltending. Normally after a made basket play continues so someone has to stop the play while they go to review. This would ruin the flow of the game and I suspect is the reason it is not reviewable. No game comes down to one play, there were plenty of calls that went in Kentucky's favor. Whiners need to accept the fact that over the course of the game LSU beat Kentucky. Accept your loss like a man.

It would only be reviewed in a situation like this where it was decisive. This is why it would be a dumb rule. If it's not reviewable at any other time in the game, why should it be reviewed in a decisive situation. OK . . . then go back through the whole game and see if you missed any other goaltending, basket interference or blocks that you called a foul on . . . the list goes on.

agreed. you can make this where in the last two minutes you can review no calls that seem to be blatant.

Shot clock is not a dead ball if it's ruled to have hit the rim... But afaik that's still a reviewable play (if it missed the rim it'd be a turnover).

I mean look at charge calls getting changed to blocks after review if the defender was in the arc. Would essentially be the same thing.