Started By
Message

re: If Bridgewater moves on, Keenum should we?

Posted on 2/13/19 at 1:59 pm to
Posted by maxxrajun70
baton rouge
Member since Oct 2011
3726 posts
Posted on 2/13/19 at 1:59 pm to
gotdammit Taysom is better than both.
Posted by Dizz
Member since May 2008
14857 posts
Posted on 2/13/19 at 4:39 pm to
quote:

Teams don’t tyically just let legitimate NFL starting QBs leave town


Hell teams don't let semi-legit/mediocre starting QBs leave town.
Posted by diat150
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2005
43851 posts
Posted on 2/13/19 at 5:10 pm to
I dont see the point in paying top dollar for a qb. we wasted alot having bridgewater, who basically danced in the locker room for a boatload of money and a pick we really need. This whole shite is about to be blown up when Brees leaves anyway.
Posted by tigernnola
NOLA
Member since Sep 2016
3589 posts
Posted on 2/13/19 at 6:01 pm to
Really ? NO
Posted by Unknown_Poster
Member since Jun 2013
5758 posts
Posted on 2/13/19 at 9:55 pm to
Why are people oblivious to the fact that someone is going to pay Nick Foles starter money and, you know, start him?
Posted by El Campo Tiger
El Campo, TX
Member since Mar 2015
10118 posts
Posted on 2/16/19 at 2:07 pm to
Until Drew steps away, do not care about the QB position.
Posted by Dotarian
Midwest
Member since Oct 2012
909 posts
Posted on 2/18/19 at 1:02 pm to
Meh. Keenums too expensive for what he's shown (minus one season).

What about Fitzpatrick instead? No pretentions of winning a starting job, and the dude put up over 400 yards on the first three Bucs opponents last year.

Whadaya say, WhoDats?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram