Started By
Message

re: what about the back to back unsportsman like conduct penalties?

Posted on 10/26/18 at 11:07 am to
Posted by boxcar willie
kenner
Member since Mar 2011
16038 posts
Posted on 10/26/18 at 11:07 am to
so ya'll assessed 60 yards in penalties on the play and set the ball at the 37 yard line on the other side of the field for the PAT? What game was that?
Posted by choupiquesushi
yaton rouge
Member since Jun 2006
30876 posts
Posted on 10/26/18 at 11:07 am to
the posing and acting stuff is a point of emphasis for at least one other conference in addition to the SEC so it is likely to get called more too..
Posted by choupiquesushi
yaton rouge
Member since Jun 2006
30876 posts
Posted on 10/26/18 at 11:09 am to
quote:

so ya'll assessed 60 yards in penalties on the play and set the ball at the 37 yard line on the other side of the field for the PAT? What game was that?
yep.. they threw a hail mary which was incomplete....


not going there as far as which game it was, for reasons if you officiated you would get...
Posted by lsufan_26
Member since Feb 2004
12559 posts
Posted on 10/26/18 at 11:09 am to
I couldn't care less about the additional penalties, even after they were called. I was MUCH, MUCH, MUCH more concerned about the targeting call. The second I heard there was a targeting penalty, I knew the implication of that player would be suspended for the first half of the Bama game. Once they said it was on #40, I was fricking livid. After they showed the replay on the jumbotron, I was like, "Okay, cool, they have to overturn this." When the ref, the targeting call stood, I stood there in absolute disbelief. I said some pretty terrible things, so I apologize if you had your children near me.
Posted by boxcar willie
kenner
Member since Mar 2011
16038 posts
Posted on 10/26/18 at 11:09 am to
I just want to see it on one other game some where at some point in time. Can you point to another SEC game where it was assessed in this manner?
Posted by Ragin Tiger1
Houston, TX
Member since Oct 2018
965 posts
Posted on 10/26/18 at 11:12 am to
I brought this exact game up to my friend. If our guys were flagged individually, why wasn’t there whole team flagged individually.
Posted by bbap
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2006
96081 posts
Posted on 10/26/18 at 11:13 am to
I've never seen it. What if 5 players posed? Would they have assessed 90 yards-ish worth of penalties?

Not exactly 90 because at some point you start assessing half the distance instead of 15 yards. But the point remains.
This post was edited on 10/26/18 at 11:15 am
Posted by boxcar willie
kenner
Member since Mar 2011
16038 posts
Posted on 10/26/18 at 11:13 am to
quote:

couldn't care less about the additional penalties, even after they were called. I was MUCH, MUCH, MUCH more concerned about the targeting call. The second I heard there was a targeting penalty, I knew the implication of that player would be suspended for the first half of the Bama game. Once they said it was on #40, I was fricking livid. After they showed the replay on the jumbotron, I was like, "Okay, cool, they have to overturn this." When the ref, the targeting call stood, I stood there in absolute disbelief. I said some pretty terrible things, so I apologize if you had your children near me.



well of course everyone was more upset about the targeting call.


but this separate thing has flown under the radar and just points to a particular ref in this instance acting in an irrational manner towards LSU with what looked like misguided anger. Did you see the expression on his face? he was some pissed off

I have just never seen a ref looking so angry, agitated, and pissed off
This post was edited on 10/26/18 at 11:18 am
Posted by boxcar willie
kenner
Member since Mar 2011
16038 posts
Posted on 10/26/18 at 11:15 am to
quote:

not going there as far as which game it was, for reasons if you officiated you would get...


so a high school game, ok, I get it and you really can't even point to it to prove it happened, got it
Posted by choupiquesushi
yaton rouge
Member since Jun 2006
30876 posts
Posted on 10/26/18 at 11:20 am to
quote:

I just want to see it on one other game some where at some point in time. Can you point to another SEC game where it was assessed in this manner?
I'll dig for it...

also I was at a game (not officiating) that a team in NO got 5 yes 5 UNS in leading up to coin toss... 4 on players 1 on a coach - all deserved...


and here is a tricky one..


I saw targeting called on a LB on a hit on a receiver and it was declined! because there was ALSO roughing the passer.... the targeting was not going to give them a first down - so they took roughing which is an automatic first down.. targeting is not.
Posted by choupiquesushi
yaton rouge
Member since Jun 2006
30876 posts
Posted on 10/26/18 at 11:21 am to
quote:

not going there as far as which game it was, for reasons if you officiated you would get...


so a high school game, ok, I get it and you really can't even point to it to prove it happened, got it
oh I could...... the coach of the team that got penalized was and is a good friend of mine, whom i respect a great deal.....


I know for a fact karr got 5 after one play and 4 BEFORE kickoff in another game...


and well st aug had a bizarre one many years ago that is still mind boggling..
This post was edited on 10/26/18 at 11:25 am
Posted by choupiquesushi
yaton rouge
Member since Jun 2006
30876 posts
Posted on 10/26/18 at 11:21 am to
quote:

Can you point to another SEC game where it was assessed in this manner?
actually yes.. google is your friend
Posted by choupiquesushi
yaton rouge
Member since Jun 2006
30876 posts
Posted on 10/26/18 at 11:22 am to
quote:

I've never seen it. What if 5 players posed? Would they have assessed 90 yards-ish worth of penalties?

Not exactly 90 because at some point you start assessing half the distance instead of 15 yards. But the point remains.
you reach a point in there where it goes to half the distance...
Posted by boxcar willie
kenner
Member since Mar 2011
16038 posts
Posted on 10/26/18 at 11:24 am to
quote:

I'll dig for it... also I was at a game (not officiating) that a team in NO got 5 yes 5 UNS in leading up to coin toss... 4 on players 1 on a coach - all deserved... and here is a tricky one.. I saw targeting called on a LB on a hit on a receiver and it was declined! because there was ALSO roughing the passer.... the targeting was not going to give them a first down - so they took roughing which is an automatic first down.. targeting is not.



I am not talking about individual separate penalties being added up but rather penalties on each player in one incident at one time doing a group celebration type thing essentially together
Posted by choupiquesushi
yaton rouge
Member since Jun 2006
30876 posts
Posted on 10/26/18 at 11:26 am to
quote:

I am not talking about individual separate penalties being added up but rather penalties on each player in one incident at one time doing a group celebration type thing essentially together

ah ok... that's a little tougher... but I know who to ask... keep in mind.. it being a point of emphasis now and the coaches know it - so it's more likely to be called and less likely to be done..
Posted by Tiger Vision
Mandeville
Member since Jan 2005
3720 posts
Posted on 10/26/18 at 12:02 pm to
quote:


I saw targeting called on a LB on a hit on a receiver and it was declined


That's interesting. I wonder if Moorehead could have declined the targeting call on D. White? Does the player still get suspended if the penalty is declined?
This post was edited on 10/26/18 at 12:04 pm
Posted by Nutriaitch
Montegut
Member since Apr 2008
7989 posts
Posted on 10/26/18 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

being a point of emphasis now


point of emphasis should only affect how often it gets called, not how it is enforced.


i’ve watched a ton of football over the last 30+ years. i’ve never seen it enforced that way.
when multiple players celebrate together, it is typically called as one penalty. not a separate penalty for each individual participating in the group celebration.

Posted by choupiquesushi
yaton rouge
Member since Jun 2006
30876 posts
Posted on 10/26/18 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

point of emphasis should only affect how often it gets called, not how it is enforced.

if they call individual different UNS... that

is how it will be enforced....

Multiple UNS after the same play are rare but they do happen... especially in two conferences
Posted by Nutriaitch
Montegut
Member since Apr 2008
7989 posts
Posted on 10/26/18 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

Multiple UNS after the same play are rare but they do happen... especially in two conferences


for multiple offenses. not for same offense.

directly from NCAA rule book:

quote:

Any delayed, excessive, prolonged or choreographed act by which a player (or players) attempts to focus attention upon himself (or themselves).


the celebration was a singular act, which can be 1 player or multiple players.

a singular act receives a singular penalty.

Posted by choupiquesushi
yaton rouge
Member since Jun 2006
30876 posts
Posted on 10/26/18 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

the celebration was a singular act, which can be 1 player or multiple players.

a singular act receives a singular penalty.
one player easily could have said something or done something else that the cameras didn't pick up.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram