- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Cocaine Mitch doesn’t have the votes yet, as of this morning
Posted on 10/5/18 at 7:31 am
Posted on 10/5/18 at 7:31 am
Posted on 10/5/18 at 7:32 am to Northwestern tiger
Wonder if they can keep this up for another month
Posted on 10/5/18 at 7:32 am to Northwestern tiger
That's fine, put em on record
Posted on 10/5/18 at 7:33 am to Northwestern tiger
Oh well - get them on the record regardless.
Posted on 10/5/18 at 7:34 am to Northwestern tiger
quote:
according to people with direct knowledge
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Posted on 10/5/18 at 7:35 am to Northwestern tiger
He has the votes. From even that article, it looks like Flake, Collins are pretty good. Manchin depends on the others but he could be a yes. And Murkowski is the most likely R to vote no. I think she’s a yes.
Posted on 10/5/18 at 7:35 am to Northwestern tiger
It's CNN, so you have to take this with a grain of salt. However, it is a terrible deal when you have Democrat senators who are more afraid of the thug from New York than their own voters.
Posted on 10/5/18 at 7:35 am to Northwestern tiger
Why do you fall for that CNN bs?
Posted on 10/5/18 at 7:38 am to Northwestern tiger
Cocaine Mitch will have no mercy on their souls if they vote no
Posted on 10/5/18 at 7:38 am to Northwestern tiger
They keep this up and it will be a red tsunami wave.
Posted on 10/5/18 at 7:39 am to Northwestern tiger
quote:
Bottom line: Republicans do not have the votes as of dawn Friday morning, according to people with direct knowledge.
Posted on 10/5/18 at 7:42 am to Northwestern tiger
That is some shiny click bait.
Posted on 10/5/18 at 7:46 am to Northwestern tiger
• Murkowski can go ahead and make her self sacrifice in the name of #metoo. We may get to watch a political suicide in live TV
• No one can argue Kavanaugh on the merits as a judge
• there was no corroboration to the false allegations of Dr. Ford and others
• the senators that vote no were always going to vote no as they are liberals or liberals in sheep’s clothing
• No one can argue Kavanaugh on the merits as a judge
• there was no corroboration to the false allegations of Dr. Ford and others
• the senators that vote no were always going to vote no as they are liberals or liberals in sheep’s clothing
Posted on 10/5/18 at 8:07 am to Northwestern tiger
Mitch needs to start yelling at the 4 undecided whent hey get on the elevators!!
Posted on 10/5/18 at 9:10 am to Northwestern tiger
My bet is when the rubber hits the road he will have the votes.
Heitkamp being a no is only because she is toast either way.
Collins and Murkowski would be complete fools to vote no. There just isn't enough there to justify a no vote.
Collins is in Class II which means she is up for re-election in 2020 when Trump will be running for re-election. Maine is a funny state, but Collins will likely need Trump to campaign with her or face a primary challenge.
If the Senate goes the way its looking in 2018 Collins frankly becomes expendable in 2020 and can be challenged in the primary.
Murkowski just got re-elected so she is a bit more of a wild card because at the end of the day she won't be held accountable for this particular vote. It won't look good for her body of work, but there is a lot of time for her to recover.
Flake is a yes he really can't walk back from getting his requested additional investigation, saying he didn't hear "any additional corroboration" and then vote no.
With Collins and Flake that makes it 50, Manchin will follow so that is 51. Then I think Murkowski becomes a yes making 52. After that, one more at risk D (would have said McCaskill a few weeks ago but she's toast; could be Stabenow depending on her internals) will jump on board making it 53. The only question I have is if some of the other Ds running will swing moving the total past 53. It could happen, but I don't think so.
If I were advising the President I would get a large rally in Michigan tonight...
Heitkamp being a no is only because she is toast either way.
Collins and Murkowski would be complete fools to vote no. There just isn't enough there to justify a no vote.
Collins is in Class II which means she is up for re-election in 2020 when Trump will be running for re-election. Maine is a funny state, but Collins will likely need Trump to campaign with her or face a primary challenge.
If the Senate goes the way its looking in 2018 Collins frankly becomes expendable in 2020 and can be challenged in the primary.
Murkowski just got re-elected so she is a bit more of a wild card because at the end of the day she won't be held accountable for this particular vote. It won't look good for her body of work, but there is a lot of time for her to recover.
Flake is a yes he really can't walk back from getting his requested additional investigation, saying he didn't hear "any additional corroboration" and then vote no.
With Collins and Flake that makes it 50, Manchin will follow so that is 51. Then I think Murkowski becomes a yes making 52. After that, one more at risk D (would have said McCaskill a few weeks ago but she's toast; could be Stabenow depending on her internals) will jump on board making it 53. The only question I have is if some of the other Ds running will swing moving the total past 53. It could happen, but I don't think so.
If I were advising the President I would get a large rally in Michigan tonight...
Posted on 10/5/18 at 9:15 am to Northwestern tiger
quote:
Key undecided senators -- including West Virginia Democrat Joe Manchin -- maintained they were undecided on Friday morning and won't make their decision known until they're on the Senate floor.
I’m sure it has nothing to do with paid agitators harassing them on the way to the senate.
This post was edited on 10/5/18 at 9:15 am
Posted on 10/5/18 at 9:16 am to Northwestern tiger
Given the closeness, there’s no scenario where Manchin could vote no and keep his seat lol
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News