- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Breaking: Kavanaugh and Accuser to Tesify Publicly Monday
Posted on 9/17/18 at 7:31 pm to Magician2
Posted on 9/17/18 at 7:31 pm to Magician2
Kavanaugh better get his stuff together.
This was recently reported:
This was recently reported:
quote:
Sen. Orrin G. Hatch (R-Utah), a member of the committee, said that Kavanaugh told him in a conversation Monday that he was not present at the party in question.
Posted on 9/17/18 at 7:34 pm to texridder
Obviously Kavanaugh is lying. And Christine Blasey is telling the truth.
Posted on 9/17/18 at 7:35 pm to Magician2
I would hope that they have access to real trial attorneys. To listen the these jokers ask "questions" which are comprised of a 10 minute speech and then an, "Am I correct?" at the end is just horrible.
I remember watching Arlen Specter truly cross-examine Anita Hill. It was very effective. I'm not sure that in today's "me too" world a male can get away with that kind of cross-examination. But one need not be nasty to effectively cross-examine - in fact being nasty is not really effective at all.
I spend hours preparing a cross-examination of my opponent in every jury case I try. If it's done correctly, there's nothing like it. If it's botched, throw in the towel because you lose the jury.
Someone needs to carefully craft questions that require a "yes" or "no" answer and hold the witness to answer accordingly.
This is my wish, I doubt it will happen.
I remember watching Arlen Specter truly cross-examine Anita Hill. It was very effective. I'm not sure that in today's "me too" world a male can get away with that kind of cross-examination. But one need not be nasty to effectively cross-examine - in fact being nasty is not really effective at all.
I spend hours preparing a cross-examination of my opponent in every jury case I try. If it's done correctly, there's nothing like it. If it's botched, throw in the towel because you lose the jury.
Someone needs to carefully craft questions that require a "yes" or "no" answer and hold the witness to answer accordingly.
This is my wish, I doubt it will happen.
Posted on 9/17/18 at 7:36 pm to texridder
Get what together? The 65 classmates who said she is fos or the witness she named in her accusation that said she's lying?
Posted on 9/17/18 at 7:37 pm to texridder
Prove he was there.
Should be easy, right?
Should be easy, right?
Posted on 9/17/18 at 7:37 pm to texridder
quote:
Kavanaugh better get his stuff together.
Please bring the proof he was at a party in 1982
That bitch better have some polaroids of Kavanaugh at said party.
Remember there wasn't Snapchat in 82 and we didn't document all the things we did.
Posted on 9/17/18 at 7:37 pm to Magician2
Why can't they do this before we have to listen to this Anita Hill garbage for a fricking week?
Posted on 9/17/18 at 7:39 pm to MrLarson
She probably has a signed yearbook with Kav saying "have a great summer, sorry I grabbed your boobie "
Posted on 9/17/18 at 7:47 pm to the808bass
quote:
Sen. Orrin G. Hatch (R-Utah), a member of the committee, said that Kavanaugh told him in a conversation Monday that he was not present at the party in question.
quote:Here's my problem. I don't see how Kavanaugh knew he wasn't at the party in question if Ford couldn't give the location of the party? Maybe he is piecing it together by who Ford says was at the party, but that seems like it would be hard to do.
Obviously Kavanaugh is lying. And Christine Blasey is telling the truth.
Posted on 9/17/18 at 7:48 pm to the808bass
quote:
Obviously Kavanaugh is lying. And Christine Blasey is telling the truth.
I believe both of them.
Messrs. Kavenaugh [sic] and Judge attempting their 1st homosexual experience must have been traumatic for Kavenoff [sic]; and so, he likely suppressed the memory of the event, or simply was in a blackout from his drunkeness during the attack part of it.
Posted on 9/17/18 at 7:48 pm to texridder
Or maybe this girl made a drunken spectacle of herself at a party that some of his classmates attended.
Or maybe Kavanaugh was never at a party with her. If he was never at a party with her but knew her, he could easily say he wasn’t at “that party.”
Or maybe Kavanaugh was never at a party with her. If he was never at a party with her but knew her, he could easily say he wasn’t at “that party.”
This post was edited on 9/17/18 at 7:50 pm
Posted on 9/17/18 at 7:56 pm to the808bass
First question they come out and ask.. Why did this crap come this week and why was never reported to police.. Next question is their any cum stain cloths for prove
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconrotflmao.gif)
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconrotflmao.gif)
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconrotflmao.gif)
Posted on 9/17/18 at 8:24 pm to Magician2
Republican bitches letting the dimocrats run their committee. Sad sad sad.
Does anyone up there have nuts
Does anyone up there have nuts
Posted on 9/17/18 at 8:27 pm to Magician2
I’m predicting the woman doesn’t show to testify on Monday.
Posted on 9/17/18 at 8:29 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Screw that. Call her before the Senate tomorrow.
Posted on 9/17/18 at 8:34 pm to Magician2
Mr. Kavanaugh... are you still raping women???
-dem question.
It's going to be shite like that
-dem question.
It's going to be shite like that
Posted on 9/17/18 at 8:38 pm to LSURussian
quote:
I’m predicting the woman doesn’t show to testify on Monday.
Me too. There will be some bullshite reason.
Posted on 9/17/18 at 8:51 pm to TBPland
quote:
Republican bitches letting the dimocrats run their committee. Sad sad sad.
Does anyone up there have nuts
I get the impression that the Republicans are calling her bluff. A few days ago she didn't even want to be identified, and now she has to get grilled publicly with the entire country watching?
Ten bucks says she starts getting "death threats" and doesn't even show up.
Posted on 9/17/18 at 8:52 pm to Stonehog
quote:
I get the impression that the Republicans are calling her bluff.
You get that impression?
Very prescient.
Posted on 9/17/18 at 10:55 pm to Magician2
Guarantee that the Dems ask Kavanaugh will also take a polygraph. He of course would be insane to agree to something like that and will say no.
That will be the lead argument against him on CNN for days to come.
That will be the lead argument against him on CNN for days to come.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)