re: What’s so great about socialism?

quote:

---

You could have private property and have your own business, it was just the the Government told you what you have to manufacture, or what you could charge for it.

---

Aka. The govt ran your business and you were just the figurehead of the business.

And just to drive this point home. What if you, the “business owner” decided to sell at a different price or make a different product?

Would the govt be like ok fam. That’s cool. Or would you be arrested (read killed), and the govt place another person in charge who listens to them?

So, if you have no say in the running of your business, and if you can just be replaced with someone new at the drop of a hat, do you really “own” your business?

Free shite and people legit think they dont have to work.

Amen to that, I’m right there with you. Already have my lazy boy ready.

quote:

---

Sweden and Denmark have 1/10th the population of the US. Won't work here..

---

OP mentioned Cuba and Burma - what % of our population do you think they have that makes them apt comparisons?

If you want to argue that Nordic-style democratic socialism won't work here, argue that. Using these stupid straw men makes you look like an idiot and immediately discredits your argument.

quote:

---

Except neither of these countries are socialist...

---

Looks like you found out the whole game. Welcome to the Resistance!

quote:

---

BamaAtl

---

I think you are committing a post hoc fallacy here.

You are pointing to scandinavia and their successes and attributing it to socialism democracy...aka free market capitalism but generous public benefits to go along with it.

Here is your issue: the desirable characteristics of Scandinavia existed well before their welfare states started

quote:

---

What might come as a surprise to American admirers of the Nordic countries is that high levels of income equality evolved during the same period. Swedish economists Jesper Roine and Daniel Waldenström, for example, explain that “most of the decrease [in income inequality in Sweden] takes place before the expansion of the welfare state and by 1950 Swedish top income shares were already lower than in other countries.” A recent paper by economists Anthony Barnes Atkinson and Jakob Egholt Søgaard reaches a similar conclusion for Denmark and Norway.

---

quote:

---

In 1960, well before large welfare states had been created in Nordic countries, Swedes lived 3.2 years longer than Americans, while Norwegians lived 3.8 years longer and Danes 2.4 years longer. Today, after the Nordic countries have introduced universal health care, the difference has shrunk to 2.9 years in Sweden, 2.6 years in Norway, and 1.5 years in Denmark. The differences in life span have actually shrunk as Nordic countries moved from a small public sector to a democratic-socialist model with universal health coverage. Moreover, the longest average life spans among Nordic peoples are found in Iceland — the small Nordic cousin that has the most distinctly Nordic culture, but also the most limited welfare system.

---

quote:

---

It is equally interesting to look at Nordic Americans, a group that combines the Nordic success culture with U.S.-style capitalism. It was mainly the impoverished people in the Nordic countries who sailed across the Atlantic to found new lives. And yet, as I write in my book, Danish Americans today have fully 55 percent higher living standard than Danes. Similarly, Swedish Americans have a 53 percent higher living standard than Swedes. The gap is even greater, 59 percent, between Finnish Americans and Finns. Even though Norwegian Americans lack the oil wealth of Norway, they have a 3 percent higher living standard than their cousins overseas.

---

quote:

---

In short: What the American Left admires about the Nordic countries clearly has less to do with their social-democratic welfare states than with the exceptional culture in these historically Protestant societies.

---

quote:

---

During the past few decades, the Nordic countries have gradually been reforming their social systems. Taxes have been cut to stimulate work, public benefits have been limited in order to reduce welfare dependency, pension savings have been partially privatized, for-profit forces have been allowed in the welfare sector, and state monopolies have been opened up to the market. In short, the universal-welfare-state model is being liberalized. Even the social-democratic parties themselves realize the need for change.

---

In a Free Society like the US, you can (should be able to) do what you want. In a Socialist society, NO. the government would control your industry if it was important to the Society. This is what distinguishes a Fascist Socialist government (NAZI's) from the Communist Socialists where you didn't even own the business, the Government does. Even if you are running the business, you are just a Worker for the state.

quote:

---

This is what distinguishes a Fascist Socialist government (NAZI's) from the Communist Socialists where you didn't even own the business, the Government does. Even if you are running the business, you are just a Worker for the state.

---

You don’t own the company in either. The government owns the company in both. You’re a figurehead in one and you’re nothing in the other.

You should read back. I called the OP stupid for trying to call communist countries socialist.