- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: VolTiger -Kristian Fulton
Posted on 7/19/18 at 4:38 am to IntenseKid
Posted on 7/19/18 at 4:38 am to IntenseKid
quote:
Ncaa will clear him. Then the sec office will still rule him ineligible. Happens to one of our players every single year.
I disagree given this particular situation.
Posted on 7/19/18 at 7:40 am to beauchristopher
quote:
Ncaa will clear him. Then the sec office will still rule him ineligible. Happens to one of our players every single year.
I disagree given this particular situation.
Yep, no way SEC does this. The kid had a year of his career ripped from him for a drug test he didnt fail. Nor did he turn in an altered sample.
He "thought" about cheating but didnt. It doesnt matter if he changed his mind on the way there, or 10 seconds before handing it to the tester...he changed his mind, gave a sample, and passed the test.
Case clos3d... hes suffered enough and more than any KID who has actually failed a test
Posted on 7/19/18 at 10:43 am to GeeOH
quote:
He "thought" about cheating but didnt. It doesnt matter if he changed his mind on the way there, or 10 seconds before handing it to the tester...he changed his mind
this is objectively false.
Fulton has admitted that he was caught pouring a foreign liquid (read: someone else's pee) into the receptacle before being caught by the proctor.
he didnt have some come to jesus moment and decide to do the right thing. he got caught, end of story. is a 2 year ban excessive? yes. but lets stop pretending like Fulton is some choir boy, the dude was smoking weed, no one at LSU bothered to tell him "hey they arent testing for that" , he panicked, and tried to falsify his test results.
Posted on 7/19/18 at 11:37 am to Dave England
quote:
Fulton has admitted that he was caught pouring a foreign liquid (read: someone else's pee) into the receptacle before being caught by the proctor.
It's not a sample until its capped, taped, and signed. Until he hands it over, it's just a cup with pink. That's the process that keeps a biased sampler from fricking with a sample.
Trust me on this, I'm heavy into this business. And I employ collectors.
I do agree with you on not having a coming yo jesus moment.
And I deal in real life courts and not kangaroo SEC "hearings"
But if you want to get "legal". It is not a sample confirmed until it is signed off on.
Most times, it's a 2 step process that never leaves the eyes of the person being tested. POC cups have a temp reading that is noted and has a range of acceptable temp as being a "fresh" sample. Then its capped and has a seal placed on closed lid that is signed/initialed by the tested person. That seal has to be in place when reaching lab and being accessioned. If seal is missing or torn..ssmple is void.
My explanation is very watered down, just to speak about it..
And again, SEC doesnt necessarily follow the legal grounds of a court. But when attorneys get involved, arguements more follow the legal court precedents, which I assume is happening here.
I hope so, because Fulton absolutely would win in court IF he didnt actually turn the bad sample in and sign
Posted on 7/19/18 at 12:27 pm to GeeOH
quote:
And I deal in real life courts and not kangaroo SEC "hearings"
this isn't the SEC. and as much as you conspiracy theorists want to believe that someone in an office in Birmingham has something to do with this, you should be taking a good long hard look in the mirror.
its been made very, very clear that this was an NCAA test, not an LSU test, not an SEC test.
quote:
But when attorneys get involved, arguements more follow the legal court precedents, which I assume is happening here.
I hope so, because Fulton absolutely would win in court IF he didnt actually turn the bad sample in and sign
this isn't in a court of law, Fultons attorney did not file suit.
you may be heavy into the business of people peeing in cups, but you sound way out of your element when it comes to discussing NCAA hearings.
Posted on 7/19/18 at 12:52 pm to Dave England
quote:
Dave England
Dude..SEC, NCAA etc try to keep up. Everyone knows it's an NCAA test.
quote:
this isn't in a court of law
A
Agreed, try to keep up
quote:
Fultons attorney
Hmmmmm, wonder why he is using an attorney. Probably to argue the legality of the wording of the rule compared to the actual actions of Fulton and if a sample existed. Try to keep up
quote:
but you sound way out of your element when it comes to discussing NCAA hearings.
Nope. They are "hearings" at this point. That changes when an attorney is convinced the interpretation of the law is wrong and filed an injunction request which outs it in a judges hands, ie, the courts and makes it gulp...legal
No one wants that, including the NCAA. Which is why they are rehearing the case.
Posted on 7/19/18 at 12:54 pm to GeeOH
I just wanted to extend a solid ‘frick you’ to geeOH
any particular reason as to why you insist on trashing devin white in larry leo’s posts?? Saying he needs ‘remedial english’ and shite like that? frick off you miserable POS
any particular reason as to why you insist on trashing devin white in larry leo’s posts?? Saying he needs ‘remedial english’ and shite like that? frick off you miserable POS
Posted on 7/19/18 at 1:20 pm to GeeOH
quote:
Everyone knows it's an NCAA test.
except you, who makes reference to the "SEC kangaroo court"
quote:
Hmmmmm, wonder why he is using an attorney.
what do you suggest? you know lawyers do more than just sue people, right?
nah, nevermind, thats out of your scope of expertise of peeing in cups.
quote:
That changes when an attorney is convinced the interpretation of the law is wrong and filed an injunction request which outs it in a judges hands, ie, the courts and makes it gulp...legal
No one wants that, including the NCAA. Which is why they are rehearing the case.
lol please link me to this injunction that was filed. you sound completely clueless. you think the NCAA gives a shite about lawsuits?
Ed O'Bannon's lawsuit didnt go to trial until 5 years after it was filed. If fulton's attorney filed some sort of pleading, by the time they got any sort of resolution Fulton will already be a pro-bowler in the NFL.
Posted on 7/19/18 at 1:46 pm to Mr. Hangover
I didnt trash him I said his English was bad. Do you disagree? I didnt say he NEEDS anything.
Its not a Devin white issue, most kids' skills in the English vocabulary are diminished and improper.
You could use some brushing up yourself in both writing and reading comprehension.
Its not a Devin white issue, most kids' skills in the English vocabulary are diminished and improper.
You could use some brushing up yourself in both writing and reading comprehension.
Posted on 7/19/18 at 1:58 pm to GeeOH
You can sugarcoat shite all you want to and it’s still going to be a turd.. I stand by my opinion, you’re a POS. His ‘english’ is just fine, I had zero problems understanding him. Now frick off, hoe
Posted on 7/20/18 at 1:22 am to beauchristopher
For the record, I was 100% being sarcastic when I said the SEC will rule him ineligible.
This post was edited on 7/20/18 at 1:23 am
Posted on 7/20/18 at 8:43 am to IntenseKid
This thread has gone to shite
Posted on 7/20/18 at 1:42 pm to 1999
You’re confusing expectation with potential.
Posted on 7/20/18 at 2:28 pm to IntenseKid
I thought so, but just never sure on here.
Posted on 7/21/18 at 9:10 am to GeeOH
I dont care about the poster fights going on here but you are spot on about the test validity and the impetus for the new hearing. I have dealt with employee testing for years and the company will often come to the table in a bad test rather than a) go to court or b) have the whole program evaluated and set back.
And as you said, it in the courts it is not a sample until the sample is sealed and signed.
And as you said, it in the courts it is not a sample until the sample is sealed and signed.
Posted on 7/21/18 at 10:45 am to GetmorewithLes
quote:
dont care about the poster fights going on here but you are spot on about the test validity and the impetus for the new hearing. I have dealt with employee testing for years and the company will often come to the table in a bad test rather than a) go to court or b) have the whole program evaluated and set back.
And as you said, it in the courts it is not a sample until the sample is sealed and signed.
Thank you for this. I agree I come across in the wrong way sometimes, but it's like people on this site would rather bad information than to actually hear , nor only facts, but logical progression by using facts.
It's not a court case...yet and no one ever wants it to become one. But he has a lawyer. That lawyer looks at the laws of both NCAA and federal statutes that have been created thru the courts.
My semi-educated guess is that the lawyer has found a significant issue that conflicts with the standards set in the courts.
Who knows where this goes? The NCAA is rehearing it for a reason. And that's a good thing no matter what the outcome is.
Very word situation, but IF the legal word of a "sample" is used...from what I've read, the bad sample was never handed to the collector, so the question will be, did he try and cheat the test.
On top of that, he was clean when he gave his own sample.
So many places for all of us to be wrong...but I sure hope you and I have a point and it works to get him active! Having great db's at both corners opens up the D to blitz
Posted on 7/21/18 at 4:03 pm to GeeOH
Despite that mass wall of text....you are still a dumbass who doesn’t know what the frick he is talking about.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News