- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: And the left freaks out....Antifa related
Posted on 7/11/18 at 9:35 pm to DawgfaninCa
Posted on 7/11/18 at 9:35 pm to DawgfaninCa
If someone carries a gun, they intend to break the law. Ban guns!
Do you not see how this is a slippery slope?
I’m arguing from the stance that banning masks is a 1st amendment issue. Freedom of speech.
Do you not see how this is a slippery slope?
I’m arguing from the stance that banning masks is a 1st amendment issue. Freedom of speech.
1
Posted on 7/11/18 at 9:36 pm to Manzielathon
quote:
How are you going to be held accountable if the police can’t identify you because of a mask?
Jesus Christ you are an idiot.
Are you okay with the government requiring you to wear a tracking chip? What about operating facial recognition databases and other info to create a real-time map showing your location? How about collecting your internet search history and creating a metaprofile on every citizen?
Republicans wanting less freedoms.. is very predictable
Posted on 7/11/18 at 9:37 pm to Centinel
quote:
You think that unless a right is specifically spelled out in the Constitution, it does not exist and government has the power to deny you that right?
Why do you think we are able to amend the constitution?
Posted on 7/11/18 at 9:37 pm to bmy
I’m a republican, I’m against this wholeheartedly. I want less of the government telling me what I can and cannot do under the guise that I MIGHT break the law
Posted on 7/11/18 at 9:39 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:
Why do you think we are able to amend the constitution?
God damn you are stupid.
And no better than the proggy idiots on this forum.
Posted on 7/11/18 at 9:39 pm to bmy
quote:
Are you okay with the government requiring you to wear a tracking chip? What about operating facial recognition databases and other info to create a real-time map showing your location? How about collecting your internet search history and creating a metaprofile on every citizen?
Republicans wanting less freedoms.. is very predictable
And frick you statist conservative dickheads for making me agree with bmy.
Posted on 7/11/18 at 9:40 pm to Centinel
Ha I was thinking the same thing
Posted on 7/11/18 at 9:41 pm to TexasTiger1984
I want to bookmark this threa for easy recall in ten years when the shoe inevitability lands on the other foot
Posted on 7/11/18 at 9:49 pm to Wtodd
Mask laws won't solve the problem because the places that antifa riot will rarely enforce those laws.
Personally.. I think antifa should be dispersed anytime they publicly gather while masked. There is enough precedent now to know that every time antifa publicly gathers while wearing a mask, that they're going to riot and get violent.
After you disperse them, it'll be easier to see which ones are breaking the law, and arrest them. If they refuse to disperse.. arrest them.
Personally.. I think antifa should be dispersed anytime they publicly gather while masked. There is enough precedent now to know that every time antifa publicly gathers while wearing a mask, that they're going to riot and get violent.
After you disperse them, it'll be easier to see which ones are breaking the law, and arrest them. If they refuse to disperse.. arrest them.
Posted on 7/11/18 at 9:52 pm to bmy
quote:
Are you okay with the government requiring you to wear a tracking chip?
See, sore loser lefties constantly use absurd examples in a lame attempt to prove their point.
I have no problem with convicted felons being required by the government to wear a tracking chip. Once you are convicted of a felon you give up certain rights.
quote:
What about operating facial recognition databases and other info to create a real-time map showing your location?
If someone has been convicted of committing a felony, is suspected of committing a felony or suspected of being in the act of committing a felony then I have no problem with the government doing that.
After all, law abiding citizens have a right to have their government protect them from convicted felons.
quote:
How about collecting your internet search history and creating a metaprofile on every citizen?
I oppose the collecting of everyone's internet search history and creating a metaprofile on every citizen.
There is no probable cause for the government to do that.
Posted on 7/11/18 at 9:52 pm to Plx1776
quote:
Personally.. I think antifa should be dispersed anytime they publicly gather while masked. There is enough precedent now to know that every time antifa publicly gathers while wearing a mask, that they're going to riot and get violent.
What they "might" do isn't grounds for removing their right to protest. They moment they get violent, arrest them. That's how laws work in this country.
At least I thought so.
Posted on 7/11/18 at 9:54 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:
is suspected of committing a felony or suspected of being in the act of committing a felony then I have no problem with the government doing that.
Such a good little nazi.
Posted on 7/11/18 at 10:01 pm to Centinel
quote:
Why do you think we are able to amend the constitution?
quote:
God damn you are stupid.
I'm smart enough to know the answer to my question.
Apparently, you don't know the answer.
quote:
And no better than the proggy idiots on this forum.
At least when I wanted to change the law, I did it by going through the system.
A proggy is too lazy to change a law by going through the system.
This post was edited on 7/11/18 at 10:03 pm
Posted on 7/11/18 at 10:03 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:
DawgfaninCa
You been painting in the streets of Miami?
Unrelated, how's your footwork with a pair of scissors?
Posted on 7/11/18 at 10:08 pm to Centinel
quote:
is suspected of committing a felony or suspected of being in the act of committing a felony then I have no problem with the government doing that.
quote:
Such a good little nazi.
There are times when there is probable cause to suspect someone of committing a felony or suspect them of being in the act of committing a felony.
Posted on 7/11/18 at 10:11 pm to DawgfaninCa
quote:
There are times when there is probable cause to suspect someone of committing a felony or suspect them of being in the act of committing a felony.
So all people wearing a mask in public are under probable cause for committing a felony?
The justification for that is? I'm sure, again, you have empirical evidence?
Posted on 7/11/18 at 10:21 pm to Wtodd
Democrats freaked out over unmasking laws in the 1960s because they were all in the KKK.
Now Democrats freak out over unmasking laws in the 2010s because they're all anitfa terrorists.
The more things change the more they stay the same.
Now Democrats freak out over unmasking laws in the 2010s because they're all anitfa terrorists.
The more things change the more they stay the same.
Posted on 7/11/18 at 10:24 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
It's a bad law
Depends on circumstance. If masked rioters are causing chaos and destruction, unmasking them could make them assess if their dumb arse actions are worth the potential consequences of being identified.
Posted on 7/11/18 at 10:27 pm to CDawson
quote:
If masked rioters are causing chaos and destruction, unmasking them could make them assess if their dumb arse actions are worth the potential consequences of being identified.
You know what would do this better? Arresting and prosecuting them.
And the bonus part is we don't have a law banning something just because of what might happen.
Posted on 7/11/18 at 10:27 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Banning masks will not stop violent people from wearing them.
It's political intimidation with the inference that you cannot be identified.
Page 11 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News