- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So Crewz, about that 2 year deal?
Posted on 7/3/18 at 10:24 pm to BallHawk
Posted on 7/3/18 at 10:24 pm to BallHawk
Posted this in other thread..
Barnes is owed $25mil.
I would think we need to get a third team involved to make that one happen.
Hill, Matthews, Ajinca, Diallo, 2 1sts to Hawks
Bazemore and Moore to Mavericks
Barea and Barnes to Pelicans
Not even sure if that works
Barnes is owed $25mil.
I would think we need to get a third team involved to make that one happen.
Hill, Matthews, Ajinca, Diallo, 2 1sts to Hawks
Bazemore and Moore to Mavericks
Barea and Barnes to Pelicans
Not even sure if that works
Posted on 7/3/18 at 10:26 pm to LesGeaux45
I'm not going to lie, the thought of finally having a legit SF would make me give up a lot.
Posted on 7/3/18 at 10:29 pm to BallHawk
The upside of Boogie walking is that now the Pels can make uneven trades the other way. They can take on more than they give up. Hill and Ajinca for Barnes would be legal.
Posted on 7/3/18 at 10:30 pm to BallHawk
I’d rather make a trade for someone like Carroll
Hill + Ajinca + a pick. Get Carroll, who would be an expiring. Then if Randle ends up really good you have the money to bring him back
Hill + Ajinca + a pick. Get Carroll, who would be an expiring. Then if Randle ends up really good you have the money to bring him back
Posted on 7/3/18 at 10:32 pm to Crewz
Obv a couple picks would need to be tossed in there maybe 2019 1st and swap rights in 2020?
Posted on 7/3/18 at 10:33 pm to CocoLoco
While it’s no guarantee I would imagine Barnes would decline his player option and hit free agency in 2019. Therefore, he would essentially be an expiring.
Posted on 7/3/18 at 10:34 pm to Crewz
quote:
Hill and Ajinca for Barnes would be legal
Legal, sure. But what's Dallas's motivation for taking only that much back? Even with a first that seems like an awfully low price to pay for Barnes.
Posted on 7/3/18 at 10:35 pm to LesGeaux45
That’s why I think third team from an asset/talent standpoint.
Seems like a trade for Feb when Dallas realizes that they are out of it.
Seems like a trade for Feb when Dallas realizes that they are out of it.
Posted on 7/3/18 at 10:35 pm to Crewz
quote:Is that what we are offering (plus a 1st of course)? If so, sign me up.
The upside of Boogie walking is that now the Pels can make uneven trades the other way. They can take on more than they give up. Hill and Ajinca for Barnes would be legal.
This post was edited on 7/3/18 at 10:36 pm
Posted on 7/3/18 at 10:35 pm to CocoLoco
The more I have had time to think about it, the more I really wonder if Randle is going to have offers of more than 10 mil next year. Even if he plays well. Some teams will have money. Mostly bad teams. And we have seen over and over again that big men are devalued on the market. Especially ones who aren't shooters.
I think there is at least a 50/50 shot that the 10 mil the Pels can offer without cap room next year will be good enough to keep Randle
I think there is at least a 50/50 shot that the 10 mil the Pels can offer without cap room next year will be good enough to keep Randle
Posted on 7/3/18 at 10:36 pm to NOSHAU
I think they'd even be willing to include Diallo if push came to shove. Especially when it is so easy to get a big for the minimum in Free agency
Posted on 7/3/18 at 10:37 pm to Crewz
EDIT: good Lord, that was almost word-for-word the same post as LesGeaux...weird
This post was edited on 7/3/18 at 10:39 pm
Posted on 7/3/18 at 10:37 pm to Crewz
His market was fairly dry this year and with the amount of talent in the pool next year he may want to stay for 120% raise.
I am all for Barnes. I have always liked him as a fit here but I just don’t think we have the capital now to get him.
I am all for Barnes. I have always liked him as a fit here but I just don’t think we have the capital now to get him.
Posted on 7/3/18 at 10:38 pm to Crewz
quote:I think I would still do it. However, Dallas must want a lot more if you are saying they are being delusional.
I think they'd even be willing to include Diallo if push came to shove. Especially when it is so easy to get a big for the minimum in Free agency
Posted on 7/3/18 at 10:39 pm to DeionDeion
The only thing i can think of is that they want cap space next season and Barnes has indicated he plans on opting in knowing the 2019 free agency class.
Hill could be dumped by Dallas as an expiring next offseason or stretched to clear space to make a run at Butler or equivalent.
Hill could be dumped by Dallas as an expiring next offseason or stretched to clear space to make a run at Butler or equivalent.
Posted on 7/3/18 at 10:42 pm to NOSHAU
Hill+Ajinca+Diallo for Barnes? Uh yeah you can sign me up for that son.
Posted on 7/3/18 at 10:47 pm to BallHawk
I'd still probably do that. I mean we we're likely looking at having to use picks to dump Hill and Ajinca anyway. If you can get Barnes back on top of it that seems like a win. I like Cheick but wouldn't say no over him.
Posted on 7/3/18 at 10:50 pm to BallHawk
I wanted us to sign Barnes, years ago as a free agent; we signed Moore and Solo instead. He would be a good fit; I think Butler would fit better. If we want Butler, we need to trade for him (like OKC did PG). Another player who might be available is Lillard, he would be a perfect fit.
Posted on 7/3/18 at 10:57 pm to PelicansBay
fwiw I'd go for Tobias Harris. but the Clips want space for Kawhi
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News