Started By
Message

re: 20-year-old sues Walmart, Dick's because they wouldn't sell him guns

Posted on 3/6/18 at 10:31 am to
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
109146 posts
Posted on 3/6/18 at 10:31 am to
quote:

He should win the lawsuit.


Why? Unless he’s being barred from the military or going to vote, he doesn’t have a case being a 20 year old. They are not a protected class.

Anyone who thinks that someone should have the right to not bake a gay wedding cake should side with Walmart/Dick’s here.
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 3/6/18 at 10:32 am to
quote:

They are not a protected class.


Please expand on this.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
124583 posts
Posted on 3/6/18 at 10:33 am to
quote:

Anyone who thinks that someone should have the right to not bake a gay wedding cake should side with Walmart/Dick’s here.



While many of us think they should, the proggies have already set the precedent that you CAN’T refuse service, so this is just using their own ammo against them.
Posted by Loserman
Member since Sep 2007
21967 posts
Posted on 3/6/18 at 10:34 am to
quote:

He should win the lawsuit.
quote:



Why? Unless he’s being barred from the military or going to vote, he doesn’t have a case being a 20 year old. They are not a protected class.


It is discrimination by age under state law.
While there is no federal law surrounding age and the second amendment it may provide a test case.
This post was edited on 3/6/18 at 10:38 am
Posted by Jack Bauers HnK
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
5728 posts
Posted on 3/6/18 at 10:34 am to
quote:

Anyone who thinks that someone should have the right to not bake a gay wedding cake should side with Walmart/Dick’s here.


The cake bakers did not have a problem selling cakes to gay people, they did not want to decorate the cake in such a way to promote gay marriage.

Dicks and Walmart aren’t not selling guns to 18-20 yr olds based on their intended use, they are refusing to sell to all 18-20 yr olds period.
Posted by HonoraryCoonass
Member since Jan 2005
18107 posts
Posted on 3/6/18 at 10:36 am to
quote:

Anyone who thinks that someone should have the right to not bake a gay wedding cake should side with Walmart/Dick’s here.


Is this 20 year-old asking for a custom-made gun?
Posted by Steadyhands
Slightly above I-10
Member since May 2016
6819 posts
Posted on 3/6/18 at 10:37 am to
quote:

Anyone who thinks that someone should have the right to not bake a gay wedding cake should side with Walmart/Dick’s here.


Except the courts can't rule one way and then rule the other way in this case. I agree with what you state, but the courts made their ruling and now we move forward to this case where they now have to rule in favor of the 20 year old.
Posted by bamafan1001
Member since Jun 2011
15783 posts
Posted on 3/6/18 at 11:56 am to
quote:

Anyone who thinks that someone should have the right to not bake a gay wedding cake should side with Walmart/Dick’s here.


Normally yes, but at this point I think using the lefts own antics against them is warranted
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
37585 posts
Posted on 3/6/18 at 11:58 am to
quote:

Why? Unless he’s being barred from the military or going to vote, he doesn’t have a case being a 20 year old. They are not a protected class. Anyone who thinks that someone should have the right to not bake a gay wedding cake should side with Walmart/Dick’s here.


Ah but the courts ruled they had to bake the cake. This means they have to sell
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram