Does anybody else think the league doesn't want a home team playing at home for SB?

Let me preface all this by saying I am not trying to make this into some huge conspiracy and I don't even necassarily think this will manifest itself by calls on the field--However-- I think there are fairly obvious reasons why the league would rather not have the Vikings (in this instance) in a home SB and here is 2 reasons why:

1) even the slightest perception of a homefield advantage--yes I know the league would obviously go through great lengths to take away any normal homefield advantage they possibly could--from forcing the team to stay in different hotels and different locker rooms etc. but their is no way the league could completely remove that home element--not even close-- and that perception is something the league would love to avoid.

2) (this is to a much lesser extent ) having a home team hurts some of the benefits the local economy enjoys hosting the game itself. From spending money on hotels, restaurants, shops, etc. -- obviously not nearly to the extent of say CFB because the SB is more of a national event that brings visitors from all over the country and world and less of a large mass of visiting fans from that town--but it would still hurt to some extent by the pure logistics of the whole thing if a team is playing in their home city.

Having said all that and assuming for just a minute that this might be potentially true, what could that mean for this weekends Saints game? Honestly, I am not quite sure it does--HOWEVER--after we all witnessed the reality of bountygate, I don't find it a huge stretch to imagine it's beyond the rhelm of possibility to imagine the league might try to find a way to influence the Vikings not making the big game.

What say you?