- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Does the Ohio State win open the door in the final four?
Posted on 12/3/17 at 12:37 am to GratefulTiger
Posted on 12/3/17 at 12:37 am to GratefulTiger
And you just throw away SEC Champ Georgia?
Posted on 12/3/17 at 12:37 am to pogo
I don’t think it matters who between Ohio St and Alabama because Clemson will win that game. The whole damn thing is for nothing because Oklahoma will absolutely embarrass Georgia and then beat Clemson in a good game.
Posted on 12/3/17 at 12:45 am to bengalfan50
quote:
Ok not gonna say it but Ohio State has two very bad losses.
Wisconsin has one loss to a conference champion with 2 losses. Alabama lost to a 3 loss conference runner up. If you don't at least make it to your conference championship game, then you don't deserve to make the final 4. /thread
Posted on 12/3/17 at 1:00 am to pogo
quote:
would Bama be in before sec champ Georgia?
Clemson
Oklahoma
Georgia
Ohio State
This is my thinking as well.
All of these are conference champions, yet Alabama didn't win their side of the conference, let alone the actual conference.
I realize tOSU has 2 losses but the conference championship has to mean something, otherwise why even play the game?
It was a winner take all with Auburn a week ago, Auburn took it. Bama left out, it should be that simple. If Alabama sneaks in, that's a huge pile of garbage to conference championships, regardless of conference.
(Don't misunderstand, I'm not saying that if you win the conference, you're in automatically, see USC. However, depending on where the teams playing for the championships are ranked, if they're close to being at least #4, they could jump those that do not play for a conference championship, in this case Alabama)
Posted on 12/3/17 at 1:08 am to Meldedee
To be the man you gotta beat the man. Bama is still the man program. No reason to leave them out unless the committee reaches.
Posted on 12/3/17 at 1:12 am to la_birdman
I wish they would expand the playoffs to eleven teams. Each P5 conference champion gets an automatic bid. Six wildcards. Qualifications could be adjusted a bit for independent teams. The P5 conference champs get a first round bye. This would significantly increase the importance of conference championships. It would also give those teams ranked 12-20 something to really play hard for in the last few weeks of the season.
This post was edited on 12/3/17 at 1:18 am
Posted on 12/3/17 at 1:15 am to lsu13lsu
quote:
To be the man you gotta beat the man
Auburn did.
There is be no reason to put Alabama in, I don't care how good they are. It shades of 2011 again.
They had their shot and lost. Better luck next year. (not really but that's how it is for every other team)
This post was edited on 12/3/17 at 1:17 am
Posted on 12/3/17 at 1:16 am to BoomBoomBoom
quote:
If you don't at least make it to your conference championship game, then you don't deserve to make the final 4. /thread
That's a terrible criterion.
UGA made it solely because they play in a different division. They lost to Auburn worse than Bama did but got a chance to redeem the loss because of geography.
Posted on 12/3/17 at 1:20 am to dcrews
quote:
They lost to Auburn worse than Bama did but got a chance to redeem the loss because of geography.
This means nothing because they had already clinched the east before Auburn even played Georgia, let alone Alabama, Georgia was going to Atlanta regardless. Each conference is divided into 2, a north/south or east/west or whatever it's called in the ACC.
In the SEC the winner of the west plays the winner of the east, it's that simple. Winner is conference champion.
Like I stated earlier, it was a winner take all which means exactly that, between Auburn and Alabama. Alabama lost and the winner of the west and who gets the trip to the conference championship is Auburn.
Why should a team that plays one game less than conference champions get in above those champions? Why even have the championship games then?
This post was edited on 12/3/17 at 1:34 am
Posted on 12/3/17 at 1:23 am to Miss3Channels
quote:
On the bright side - either Ohio St. or Bama will be VERY disappointed tomorrow, and that's not all bad.
Mom hoping the both are.
Posted on 12/3/17 at 2:18 am to Meldedee
Ohio State just beat the only major undefeated team and are conference champions. screw bama.
Posted on 12/3/17 at 2:40 am to Meldedee
YOU NEED TO WIN THE SEC BEFORE YOU PLAY THE BIG GAME !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! BAMA SLIP IN ONE YEAR AFTER WE BEAT THEM ON THERE FILD!!!!!!
Posted on 12/3/17 at 2:45 am to la_birdman
WELL SAID !!!!!!!! GEAUXTIGERS
Posted on 12/3/17 at 4:13 am to bayoubilly57
Clemson
OKLA
Uga
Bama
Book it....
No need to even think it... this will happen
OKLA
Uga
Bama
Book it....
No need to even think it... this will happen
Posted on 12/3/17 at 4:32 am to Meldedee
Alabama are champions of what exactly?
How does the committee justify Alabama ahead of Auburn? More loses versus head to head? Seems like on the field victory is not very weighty then.
How does the committee justify Alabama ahead of Auburn? More loses versus head to head? Seems like on the field victory is not very weighty then.
This post was edited on 12/3/17 at 4:36 am
Posted on 12/3/17 at 5:27 am to themunch
They need to go to a 6 or 8 team playoff , I would rather see an 8 team playoff , the power 5 conference champs ( no matter the record) and three at large bids ..
Let this BS committee only make the 3 wildcard selections.. the less power the committee has the better ...
The good thing is there will be some upset people after the selections are made and that’s always good when it’s Bama and Osu fans .
Let this BS committee only make the 3 wildcard selections.. the less power the committee has the better ...
The good thing is there will be some upset people after the selections are made and that’s always good when it’s Bama and Osu fans .
Posted on 12/3/17 at 6:01 am to la_birdman
quote:
Why should a team that plays one game less than conference champions get in above those champions? Why even have the championship games then?
I agree, I believe conf champs should hold the edge.
HOWEVER...
Last year, Penn St = Conf Champ with 2 losses. Ohio St had 1 loss and didn’t play in the BIG CG. So why should the committee backtrack on this precedent?
Also, OSU was already whipped by one of the teams in the playoffs, and their loss to Iowa was BAD.
I think Bama is in.
This post was edited on 12/3/17 at 6:23 am
Posted on 12/3/17 at 6:04 am to Meldedee
there should be an unwritten rule that you have to win your conference to play in the playoff. I know Penn state didn't make it last year and i think that was a travesty. you can't make it a rule because of obvious reasons; like way to many conferences. or just make it a 16 team tournament and select the top 16 conferences.
Posted on 12/3/17 at 6:46 am to Thacian
quote:
Clemson
OKLA
Uga
Bama
Book it....
No need to even think it... this will happen
You got the teams right, but not the order.
Clemson
OU
Alabama
Georgia
They aren't going to make Clemson face Saban in the first round. They are the defending champs and clear #1 and will get the more favorable draw.
Clemson vs UGA
OU vs Alabama
Posted on 12/3/17 at 6:53 am to Tiger Voodoo
Obama's quality wins this year are _________?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News