Started By
Message

re: Google Pixel 2 - Live Event - Starting at 11 CST

Posted on 10/4/17 at 12:50 pm to
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33603 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 12:50 pm to
Just ordered a 2, mainly so I wouldn't have to wait 4 months to get it if I waited for 3 weeks to order it. It says it will be delivered on the 18th or 19th of Oct.
Posted by wizziko
New Jersey Nets Fan
Member since Jan 2006
35881 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 12:54 pm to
no headphone jack no care
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
78372 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 12:54 pm to
dammit i dont want to pull the trigger on this but these are damn nice phones.
Posted by rocket31
Member since Jan 2008
41819 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 12:55 pm to
ya im annoyed by the no headphone jack

but the XL2 is $849 so im going to roll with that over the iphone X which is $999
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33603 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

no headphone jack no care
Didn't they say it ships with some kind of adapter? Also, I don't use headphones much, but what's the big deal of no jack? Is it that headphones become much easier to lose? Or is it fear that the bluetooth will malfunction?
Posted by Dam Guide
Member since Sep 2005
15536 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 1:08 pm to
I love it, no headphone jack and a very high priced XL. Where are all the complainers at?
Posted by bbap
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2006
96037 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 1:09 pm to
I mean its still the cheapest of the 3 flagships.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28712 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

Also, I don't use headphones much, but what's the big deal of no jack?
I don't get all the outrage, either. I said the same thing when Apple got rid of it (and I'm no Apple fan).

That port is decades old, it takes up too much space in today's phones for the amount of functionality it provides, and it's hard to make dust- and waterproof. It's time to retire it.
Posted by rocket31
Member since Jan 2008
41819 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

Also, I don't use headphones much, but what's the big deal of no jack?


charging headphones is annoying?
sound quality is better with an AUX port?
square readers use headphone jacks to accept payments?

i use my headphone jack all the time, and now ill have to buy a square reader adapter to swipe cards for business purposes

so ya for me its pretty damn terrible
Posted by GEAUXmedic
Premium Member
Member since Nov 2011
41598 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

charging headphones is annoying?
sound quality is better with an AUX port?
square readers use headphone jacks to accept payments?

i use my headphone jack all the time, and now ill have to buy a square reader adapter to swipe cards for business purposes


It comes with a aux adapter. It supports hi-def USB-C headphones as well.

You have options. If you want your aux port, you can have it.
Posted by rocket31
Member since Jan 2008
41819 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

It comes with a aux adapter


seriously? holy, if true, im totally "jacked" now
Posted by Spock's Eyebrow
Member since May 2012
12300 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 1:21 pm to
CST?
Posted by GEAUXmedic
Premium Member
Member since Nov 2011
41598 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 1:22 pm to
Yep, he said it in the presentation.

quote:

"Use your existing analog headphones with the included adapter," Queiroz said.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33603 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

charging headphones is annoying?
That's a good one I hadn't thought of.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33603 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

USB-C
Here's a question (and I forget the technical terms), but the Nexus 5X featured changed/impaired functionality via the USB C interface. e.g. You could no longer plug it into a car and have shite play on the sound system - it no longer allowed info to be conveyed that way. Is that true of the Pixel and now the Pixel 2 as well?
Posted by bbap
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2006
96037 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

Here's a question (and I forget the technical terms), but the Nexus 5X featured changed/impaired functionality via the USB C interface. e.g. You could no longer plug it into a car and have shite play on the sound system - it no longer allowed info to be conveyed that way. Is that true of the Pixel and now the Pixel 2 as well?



what are saying exactly? i have a nexus 5x and have never had trouble playing stuff on my sound system. whether the phone is charging or not.
Posted by GEAUXmedic
Premium Member
Member since Nov 2011
41598 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

Here's a question (and I forget the technical terms), but the Nexus 5X featured changed/impaired functionality via the USB C interface. e.g. You could no longer plug it into a car and have shite play on the sound system - it no longer allowed info to be conveyed that way. Is that true of the Pixel and now the Pixel 2 as well?



I haven't heard about anything changing from that. Most cars are either using straight bluetooth, or paired with android auto to where you don't need that usb connection.

Edit: I think you're talking about the 6p?
This post was edited on 10/4/17 at 1:28 pm
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33603 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

I think you're talking about the 6p?
5X
quote:

Most cars are either using straight bluetooth, or paired with android auto to where you don't need that usb connection.
Became an issue when the bluetooth on my 5X was malfunctioning. I've heard that LG devices in general have had trouble. I'm excited to come back to HTC, which made my first 2 smartphones I ever owned.
Posted by wizziko
New Jersey Nets Fan
Member since Jan 2006
35881 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

That port is decades old, it takes up too much space in today's phones for the amount of functionality it provides, and it's hard to make dust- and waterproof. It's time to retire it.

That decades old port is still universally used and nowhere close to being obsolete. I'm sure the charging port is just as hard to make dust and waterproof as a headphone jack so why did they keep that?
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28712 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

That decades old port is still universally used
So? Many old techs have been replaced while they were still universally used. This is a time of transition. There are adapters to help people through it.
quote:

nowhere close to being obsolete
You're going to have to give me your definition of "obsolete", because it seems like you think that as long as something still works, it's not obsolete.

There is newer tech that replaces the functionality of the port entirely, in addition to providing many, many other functions, in a smaller package. How is that not obsolete?
quote:

I'm sure the charging port is just as hard to make dust and waterproof as a headphone jack so why did they keep that?
Because until wireless charging and data transmission are comparable to wired as far as speed and reliability, phones need at least one port. Would you prefer to seal one port or two? Why make a breach twice as likely?
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram