- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Landrieu says there will be a 30 day delay in removing PGT Beauregard Monument
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:11 pm to ihometiger
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:11 pm to ihometiger
No way he takes REL from Lee Circle. Over the past week, he has re-focused his efforts into making a play on the national stage
2
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:19 pm to Hammertime
WWLTV just reported that Beauregard is coming down "soon."
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:19 pm to Hammertime
quote:
No way he takes REL from Lee Circle. Over the past week, he has re-focused his efforts into making a play on the national stage
the liberty monument was tucked away behind a parking garage and i bet you couldn't have found 100 new orleanians who knew where it was or what it commemorated. fine.
jefferson davis certainly higher profile, certainly more well known and certainly a bigger fish. fine.
PGTB and REL monuments are different cloth altogether. it would not surprise me if mitch decides he's made his point (whatever in the hell it was) and takes this opportunity to bail out
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:26 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:This is a sickening mindset
If that's true... the judge who so quickly ruled last week against the Monumental Task Force needs to be impeached, thrown out, etc. It's hard to believe a worse error in judgement could have been made
The judge is a very respected, CONSERVATIVE, law abiding judge. He doesnt let his feeling get in the way of the law. If you look at the documents presented on May 10th, he had no choice but to dismiss.
But you want to penalize the judge because he followed the law instead of ruling on emotion?
you are just as bad as liberals who guide themselves with their emotion.
This post was edited on 5/15/17 at 4:27 pm
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:28 pm to lsupride87
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:29 pm to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
gotta be some dirt on this clown
Do we start with paying for his kid's abortion or the current girlfriend of 10+ years?
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:29 pm to TJG210
quote:
quote: The letter from the city attorney, dated May 12, goes on to say that the city and City Park will “engage in good-faith negotiations to attempt to resolve their competing claims” over who owns the monument for a period of 30 days.
This doesn't help at all........The city will strong arm City Park bigly here.
Hmmm. So threats have already been made to City Park to effect removal and Judge Reese made a ruling clearly based on politics vs legal rights.
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:30 pm to tgrbaitn08
Did you read the links you posted? 
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:31 pm to jlc05
quote:No
Judge Reese made a ruling clearly based on politics vs legal rights.
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:31 pm to lsupride87
quote:
quote:
If that's true... the judge who so quickly ruled last week against the Monumental Task Force needs to be impeached, thrown out, etc. It's hard to believe a worse error in judgement could have been made
This is a sickening mindset
The judge is a very respected, CONSERVATIVE, law abiding judge. He doesnt let his feeling get in the way of the law. If you look at the documents presented on May 10th, he had no choice but to dismiss.
Or was he threatened or strongly encouraged?
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:32 pm to lsupride87
I skimmed them
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:32 pm to tgrbaitn08
quote:Also, I am not speaking in terms of who Judge Reese votes for. I am speaking in terms of how he interprets the law
If only his wife was.....she's a huge SJW in the city
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:33 pm to jlc05
quote:Doubt it. Yall really have no clue about Reese do you?
Or was he threatened or strongly encouraged?
He is the judge that fricking pimp slapped Landrieu and tried to throw him in jail over the firefighters pension.......
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:33 pm to lsupride87
quote:
quote: Judge Reese made a ruling clearly based on politics vs legal rights.
No
Do you know something here? If the City does not own the statue then the City cant remove it without permission from City Park...which they clearly didn't have.
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:35 pm to jlc05
quote:I have no clue who rightfully owns the statue. However, what was presented in court on May 10th in no way warranted Judge Reese to do anything in terms of stopping the city. Dismissing was the right thing to do from a legal perspective. I have spoken with many conservative Landrieu hating mother frickers, and they all agreed.
Do you know something here? If the City does not own the statue then the City cant remove it without permission from City Park...which they clearly didn't have.
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:36 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Doubt it. Yall really have no clue about Reese do you? He is the judge that fricking pimp slapped Landrieu and tried to throw him in jail over the firefighters pension.......
Ok, so what was the legal basis for his decision? We now know the City didn't have legal authority to proceed with removal.
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:37 pm to jlc05
quote:Link?
We now know the City didn't have legal authority to proceed with removal.
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:37 pm to lsupride87
So none of them knew the City did not have legal authority to remove the statue?
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:37 pm to lsupride87
They just fricking admitted it
Posted on 5/15/17 at 4:38 pm to jlc05
quote:Link?
So none of them knew the City did not have legal authority to remove the statue?
You realize nothing has changed right? They havent proven shite
Page 2 of 6
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News