Started By
Message

re: Gun to your head, you MUST go Offense at 11. Who do you pick?

Posted on 3/17/17 at 9:09 pm to
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
279414 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 9:09 pm to
1- post it, id like to read it

2- he didnt go 11th overall either
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
167018 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 9:13 pm to
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
279414 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 9:20 pm to
old school scout throwing out new age data. go figure

"measuring velocity only been around a few years"....yea, just 9



And i do agree that his arm strength can improve. Brady's did for sure, and i agree that Brees did too. Though neither of their arms were never terrible. Just average.

that said, look at their draft position.

All 3 would have hit this threshold, imo.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
167018 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 9:28 pm to
9 yrs isn't a lot in judging careers etc with a better sample size though. It may matter but how much compared to 20 other factors.
Posted by Rand AlThor
Member since Jan 2014
9485 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 9:56 pm to
McCaffrey. Dude would be absolute money in this offense.
Posted by LooseCannon22282
Mobile
Member since May 2008
33790 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 9:59 pm to
Mike Williams
Posted by bonethug0108
Avondale
Member since Mar 2013
12690 posts
Posted on 3/17/17 at 10:10 pm to
Every year there's a guy that's too small or too slow or lacks "twitch" or any number of other things that say they shouldn't be great but they are.

Greatness cannot always be measured. Sometimes it just is.
Posted by saintsfan1977
West Monroe, from Cajun country
Member since Jun 2010
7815 posts
Posted on 3/18/17 at 12:10 am to
quote:

Deshaun Watson easily.

So if we can't win with Brees, what makes anyone think we will win with Watson? If Brees is gone due to the team underperforming, Watson isn't going to fix anything.

Get Oj Howard, McCaffrey or Williams.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
279414 posts
Posted on 3/18/17 at 9:50 am to
quote:

Every year there's a guy that's too small or too slow or lacks "twitch" or any number of other things that say they shouldn't be great but they are.




and you draft that guy with the 11th pick overall!!! hell yea, recipe for success.


theres also guys like you stated above that people take chances on and dont become shite. Because most of the time physical limitations in the NFL are the death of you, especially at QB.
Posted by chrisksaint
Florida
Member since Jul 2011
1712 posts
Posted on 3/18/17 at 10:01 am to
Cook. His dynamic ability would kill on our screens and could take over for Ingram down the road assuming we just didn't dump him before.

Would equally be fine with OJ Howard or Deshaun Watson
This post was edited on 3/18/17 at 10:02 am
Posted by Number 31
St. Tammany
Member since Jul 2016
4178 posts
Posted on 3/19/17 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

and they will brutally rape you first

If I wait until after the rape to pick a player will I still get shot?
Posted by BigBrod81
Houma
Member since Sep 2010
18972 posts
Posted on 3/19/17 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

lacks "twitch" or any number of other things that say they shouldn't be great but they are.

Greatness cannot always be measured. Sometimes it just is.


Terrell Suggs

After setting the NCAA sack record, (the record should belong to Derrick Thomas though) Suggs' 4.88 40 time created some doubt whether or not he was as quick twitch as his film & production showed. His quote about his combine performance was awesome.

"I didn't do as good as I want. Some teams might grade me down. In my opinion football speed and track speed are totally different things. Just look at me play football. I can play football."
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
279414 posts
Posted on 3/19/17 at 3:33 pm to
and Jarvis Joens dominated the SEC from the edge, ran a 4.88 too, and has been terrible in the NFL. A guy like Oregon States Bill Swancutt ate LSU's lunch one year and was at the top of NCAA in sacks. But he was unathletic and slow as shite by NFL standards. Daquan Bowers.

We could do this all day. A guy like Suggs is not the norm. I just went down the list of the top 20 edge sackmen in the NFL last year and only 1 ran that slow.


the QB is even more cutthroat when it comes to physical measurables .
Posted by BigBrod81
Houma
Member since Sep 2010
18972 posts
Posted on 3/19/17 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

and Jarvis Joens dominated the SEC from the edge, ran a 4.88 too, and has been terrible in the NFL


quote:

We could do this all day. A guy like Suggs is not the norm. I just went down the list of the top 20 edge sackmen in the NFL last year and only 1 ran that slow.


Sorry but you are looking at the wrong shite. I only mentioned Suggs & his 40 yard dash because of how scouts reacted to it. While Suggs did run 4.88 in his 40, his 4.33 short shuttle showed he was quick enough in space to be a good pass rusher in the NFL. Jones on the other hand not only ran 4.88 in the 40 but he had a piss poor 4.71 in the short shuttle. So Jones not only was slow in a straight line but he was slow in his ability to change direction. Jones also racked up numerous sacks his last season at Georgia against the terrible offensive lines of Missouri, Florida & Tennessee. The writing was on the wall about Jones if anyone bothered to dig deeper.

A good read on Jarvis Jones poor measurables
Posted by moock blackjack
Member since Apr 2008
98267 posts
Posted on 3/19/17 at 3:52 pm to
Mike Williams for me since there is no OLman worth taking at 11.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
279414 posts
Posted on 3/19/17 at 3:56 pm to
1, you brought up the 40. I know what to look at. YOU brought up that number.

2, the 40 and agility times usually align, a 6'3" 260lb player who doesnt run fast usually isn't going to move fast in small spaces either. See: Jarvis Jones.

The mere fact that I can go down the line and look at the 40 times of the top 20 edge sackmen and only 1 of them run lower than a 4.84 40 proves that. I dont need to see shuttle times
Posted by BigBrod81
Houma
Member since Sep 2010
18972 posts
Posted on 3/19/17 at 4:05 pm to
quote:

1, you brought up the 40. I know what to look at. YOU brought up that number. 


And I explained why I brought it up, idiot.

quote:

2, the 40 and agility times usually align, a 6'3" 260lb player who doesnt run fast usually isn't going to move fast in small spaces either. See: Jarvis Jones. 


Wrong.



Weight: 346 pounds

40 Yard Dash: 4.89 seconds

20 Yd Shuttle: 4.56 seconds

Dontari Poe Combine Numbers

quote:

I dont need to see shuttle times




This post was edited on 3/19/17 at 4:14 pm
Posted by bonethug0108
Avondale
Member since Mar 2013
12690 posts
Posted on 3/19/17 at 4:11 pm to
He only picks the numbers that fit his argument. It's the cherry picking argumentative style at it's finest with him, which is why I stopped bothering trying to counter the ever changing goal line he sets.

I state my point, restate it, restate it, and if it never gets debunked I just wait to see who ends up being right.
This post was edited on 3/19/17 at 4:12 pm
Posted by BigBrod81
Houma
Member since Sep 2010
18972 posts
Posted on 3/19/17 at 4:22 pm to
quote:

He only picks the numbers that fit his argument. It's the cherry picking argumentative style at it's finest with him, which is why I stopped bothering trying to counter the ever changing goal line he sets. 


He can be a good poster at times then there are other times he goes full retard like right now.
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
279414 posts
Posted on 3/19/17 at 5:19 pm to
Dontari Poe was a freak. Read my post again. "Usually" 'is the key word here. I didn't say it never happens. Again, show we all these good 4.88 edge rushers that are making it in the NFL. Well, you can't, really, because you can count them on 2 fingers.

As for QBs, it's a lot hard to decipher. The ones that lack the physical traits are usually smart and then you have guys like bone thug cite "intangibles ". Well yea no shite the guy that spins a 49mph is going to have intangibles. Sure he'll show leadership ability. Sure he'll impress in the meeting rooms. That's a big part of there college success. You can't let that engulf you. I like Watson too, he was fun to watch. But you can't pick a guy that won't be able to outthrow NFL defenses at pick 11.
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram