Started By
Message

re: CBS continues to lie about early Trump inauguration photo

Posted on 1/23/17 at 1:40 pm to
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125565 posts
Posted on 1/23/17 at 1:40 pm to
This shite is so petty

Trump should not even waste his time on this

But you fricks love it
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22072 posts
Posted on 1/23/17 at 1:45 pm to
quote:

I just saw CBS This Morning show the photo that was obviously taken early in the morning of the Trump inauguration and implied it was taken when Trump was being being sworn in.



Because it was.
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125565 posts
Posted on 1/23/17 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

Instead, they keep inserting their own feet into their mouths. It's crazy to me.


Well get used it

Most of us said he would let the petty shite get under his skin.
Posted by thelawnwranglers
Member since Sep 2007
38927 posts
Posted on 1/23/17 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

This shite is so petty

Trump should not even waste his time on this

But you fricks love it


guilty
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
24011 posts
Posted on 1/23/17 at 1:50 pm to
In this article the Source of photograph from the top of the Washington Monument confirms that it was taken as 12:01 p.m.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
39753 posts
Posted on 1/23/17 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

most of us said he would let the petty shite get under his skin.


I think you might be missing the forest for the trees. The media is trying to delegitimize Trump incrementally. They don't have a big scandal to level him with so it'll be death by a thousand cuts. He has to nip shite like this in the bud now or else he spends his entire presidency looking weak against the media and constantly putting out small fires.
Posted by DawgfaninCa
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
20092 posts
Posted on 1/23/17 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

Obviously you don't know the definition of "alternative".


quote:

But a simple "fact" is true; if it's not true then it's not a fact, and not an alternative. There isn't an alternative truth, so they were either providing a fact or not.


I put quotes around the word fact to imply that it is being claimed as a fact but it has not been proven to be a fact and the absolute truth.

An actual fact which is different from the alleged "fact" that tends to prove or proves the alleged "fact" is incorrect and not the complete truth is an alternative fact while the alleged "fact" may be true to some degree but it is not the complete truth. It is, in fact, a half-truth which is a whole lie.
Posted by Cruiserhog
Little Rock
Member since Apr 2008
10460 posts
Posted on 1/23/17 at 1:57 pm to


ffs sakes you can watch a time lapse from 4 am to 1pm on inauguration day that shows the entire crowd coming and going on youtube...If you need a safe space as a Trump supporter because his crowd was smaller you can always chose to use the photo that from the podium out that has a perspective that makes it look full.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22072 posts
Posted on 1/23/17 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

I put quotes around the word fact to imply that it is being claimed as a fact but it has not been proven to be a fact and the absolute truth.


Hilarious that the guy who believes in the Loch Ness monster of SF Bay is suddenly the arbiter of 'alternative facts'.



Posted by DawgfaninCa
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
20092 posts
Posted on 1/23/17 at 7:37 pm to
quote:

I put quotes around the word fact to imply that it is being claimed as a fact but it has not been proven to be a fact and the absolute truth.


quote:

Hilarious that the guy who believes in the Loch Ness monster of SF Bay is suddenly the arbiter of 'alternative facts'.


Again, I don't "believe" in the "Loch Ness monster" of SF Bay.

I "know" that sea serpents exist because I had a definitive sighting of one from only 20 yards away as well as several other sightings of sea serpents and 3 videos of several of them in SF bay.

Skeptics say the "fact" is there is no evidence sea serpents exist and there couldn't be any evidence because the existence of sea serpents is just a myth.

I have an alternative fact that proves the skeptics are wrong when they assert it's a "fact" that there is no evidence of the existence of sea serpents and there couldn't be any evidence because the existence of sea serpents is just a myth.

The alternate fact I have is that I have 3 videos which contain evidence proving sea serpents exist.

I am willing to have a public showing of my 3 videos at which I will point out in detail the evidence in my 3 videos that proves sea serpents exist and I challenge the skeptics in the scientific community to have any skeptic of their choosing present at that public showing to debate me regarding the evidence that is contained in my 3 videos.

What is hilarious is that the skeptics in the scientific community will not accept my challenge to allow me to show them the evidence.
This post was edited on 1/23/17 at 7:38 pm
Posted by Hugo Stiglitz
Member since Oct 2010
72937 posts
Posted on 1/23/17 at 7:38 pm to
Posted by td01241
Savannah
Member since Nov 2012
23229 posts
Posted on 1/23/17 at 7:40 pm to
Put them on YouTube and post the link please
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge LA
Member since Sep 2006
36113 posts
Posted on 1/23/17 at 7:41 pm to
I know. There's a time lapse video of the crowd. Stamped pictures. Screenshots of the crowd when Trump was giving his speech. And some people are still bending over backwards claiming it's all a scam. But none of then care, right?
This post was edited on 1/23/17 at 7:42 pm
Posted by DawgfaninCa
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
20092 posts
Posted on 1/23/17 at 7:52 pm to
quote:


ffs sakes you can watch a time lapse from 4 am to 1pm on inauguration day that shows the entire crowd coming and going on youtube...If you need a safe space as a Trump supporter because his crowd was smaller you can always chose to use the photo that from the podium out that has a perspective that makes it look full.


As I stated in another post on this or another thread, Spicer made it clear in today's press conference that when he said the most people in history watched the inauguration in person and around the world that he meant more people watched the inauguration when you combine the number of people who watched the inauguration in person and around the world on TV and online.

I am sure more people attended each one of the Obama inaugurations in person than the number of people who attended the Trump inauguration in person but the number of people who attended the Trump inauguration was greater than the number the presstitutes and Trump haters are claiming attended.
Posted by DawgfaninCa
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
20092 posts
Posted on 1/23/17 at 8:03 pm to
quote:

Put them on YouTube and post the link please


Nope.

I want to present the 3 videos in a venue where I can point out in the specific frames of the videos the evidence which proves sea serpents exist and are occasionally entering SF bay.

Otherwise, the skeptics will just deny the evidence is in the videos.

They are my videos and I am the one who decides how they will be shown to the public and the skeptics in the scientific community.

I have made my challenge.

You can pass my challenge on to the scientific community and it is up to them to accept or reject it.
This post was edited on 1/23/17 at 8:06 pm
Posted by DawgfaninCa
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
20092 posts
Posted on 1/23/17 at 8:14 pm to


The Obama inauguration photo was taken almost a half hour later than the Trump inauguration photo was taken.

A lot more people could arrive at the Trump inauguration in that half hour.

Besides, what proof do you have that it was actually 11:04 AM when the Trump inauguration was taken?

Time stamps can be faked.

Posted by Chuker
St George, Louisiana
Member since Nov 2015
7544 posts
Posted on 1/23/17 at 8:22 pm to
I wish the Trump would just drop this whole silly thing. Let the media no gives a shite about make a big deal about it if they want to. His supporters don't care if there were more people there for Obama's and his detractors are going to hate him no matter what.

What the turnout boils down to is that DC votes 95% democrat and 3% republican. If the inauguration were held in Dallas the turnout would've of course been way higher since a huge amount of republicans live a few miles away.
Posted by td01241
Savannah
Member since Nov 2012
23229 posts
Posted on 1/24/17 at 9:32 am to
So in other words you have video of oarfish. Got it
Posted by DawgfaninCa
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
20092 posts
Posted on 1/24/17 at 10:11 am to
quote:

So in other words you have video of oarfish. Got it


Meh, the old rusty Occam's razor response.

The animal my brother and I described in detail that we saw from only 20 yards away does not have any physical characteristics remotely similar to an oarfish.

BTW, you do know that an oarfish rarely comes to the surface except when it is sick and dying.

Also, an oarfih does not chase sea lions,

I could go on destroying your oarfish theory but it's boring for me because it's too easy for me to do it.
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
18158 posts
Posted on 1/24/17 at 10:14 am to
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram