- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Women in Combat Arms: The Master Thread
Posted on 11/17/16 at 9:18 am to Wolfhound45
Posted on 11/17/16 at 9:18 am to Wolfhound45
quote:Correct.
Keep in mind, DJT is not an ideologue. He is a pragmatist.
Posted on 11/17/16 at 9:18 am to Jbird
quote:
I can't see them expending the political capital and the media backlash would be insane. I am guessing they will at most tell the services that minimum standards should not be lowered or altered to attain a certain outcome.
Trump has never given any indication that he cares about media backlash. Most Americans don't care one way or the other about women in combat roles and the only people eho would give a shite or make a fuss would be the loons at CNN and HuffPo. He could sign the order day one and no one would care or remember in a month.
Posted on 11/17/16 at 9:20 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:I know the DODI issued recently to Commanders skirts the issue a little, it provides guidance on how to help Larry become Laura but nothing concerning standards and which to apply until Laura becomes a female in DEERS.
Ideally, there wouldn't be a "which standards."
Posted on 11/17/16 at 9:21 am to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:I disagree the national meltdown would be epic, led by Nancy Pelosi and the rest of the cabal of estrogen.
He could sign the order day one and no one would care or remember in a month.
Posted on 11/17/16 at 9:22 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:This. It is a binary decision. Either-or.
Ideally, there wouldn't be a "which standards."
Either we keep women out of combat arms and have different standards (which recognize physical differences).
Or we have one standard across the board.
Posted on 11/17/16 at 9:22 am to Jbird
quote:
I disagree the national meltdown would be epic, led by Nancy Pelosi and the rest of the cabal of estrogen.
The left is going to be in perpetual melt down mode for the next 4 years regardless of what Trump does.
Posted on 11/17/16 at 9:23 am to cajunangelle
quote:
Can the replacements really undo the opened can of worms; regarding women in combat roles and transexuals serving?
Women are not generally pushing this issue. Ought to be easy enough to walk back, I think.
Posted on 11/17/16 at 9:23 am to GeauxxxTigers23
He also has not demonstrated he cares about this issue.
And that is the matter at hand.
And that is the matter at hand.
Posted on 11/17/16 at 9:24 am to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:Very true, no need to provide batting practice though.
The left is going to be in perpetual melt down mode for the next 4 years regardless of what Trump does.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 11/17/16 at 9:24 am to Wolfhound45
He's indicated that he wants to get political correctness out of the pentagon.
Posted on 11/17/16 at 9:26 am to Jbird
Default to male standards, in my opinion. If this is here to stay, it's time to get rid of male/female standards anyway.
If I had control of it, we'd make the standards more difficult for everyone. Forget females and transgenders. There are plenty of weak men that have no business wearing a uniform, either
If I had control of it, we'd make the standards more difficult for everyone. Forget females and transgenders. There are plenty of weak men that have no business wearing a uniform, either
Posted on 11/17/16 at 9:26 am to GeauxxxTigers23
If he empowers his SecDef (please, please Webb) then this is a moot point. The policy will be rolled back. And that is the best course of action. Let a surrogate handle it.
The wildcard is that DJT is not a politician. He is not looking at 2020. So I anticipate he will give his subordinates broad powers.
The wildcard is that DJT is not a politician. He is not looking at 2020. So I anticipate he will give his subordinates broad powers.
Posted on 11/17/16 at 9:27 am to Jbird
quote:In my opinion, and I admit that doesn't mean dick, there is a very real need to provide batting practice in regards to this issue.
no need to provide batting practice though.
I agree that this probably isn't a high priority for Trump, which is why his secdef pick is so important.
Posted on 11/17/16 at 9:27 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:Agree.
Default to male standards, in my opinion. If this is here to stay, it's time to get rid of male/female standards anyway.
quote:So PFT isn't about fitness but a weeding device in your opinion?
If I had control of it, we'd make the standards more difficult for everyone. Forget females and transgenders. There are plenty of weak men that have no business wearing a uniform, either
Posted on 11/17/16 at 9:28 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
If I had control of it, we'd make the standards more difficult for everyone. Forget females and transgenders. There are plenty of weak men that have no business wearing a uniform, either
Have you read about the recent changes to the USMC PFT?
Posted on 11/17/16 at 9:29 am to WhiskeyPapa
Hee hee...
Senators Criticize Ray Mabus for Neglecting Marine Study About Women in Combat
Members of the Senate Armed Services Committee grilled Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus on Monday for neglecting a study by the Marine Corps about the integration of women into all facets of the service, including boot camp.
The Marine Corps completed a multi-million dollar study in December that found that mixed-gender units performed poorly in ground combat tasks compared to all-male units. It has been the policy of the Marine Corps to keep ground combat all-male, and to separate men and women in enlisted basic training.
Secretary Mabus criticized the Marine Corps after it released the report, and after Secretary of Defense Ash Carter declined to exempt Marines from the requirement to open all positions to women, Mabus demanded that Marine Corps boot camp cease separating men and women for training.
At Tuesday’s hearing, Marine reserve officer Sen. Dan Sullivan (R., Alaska) questioned Mabus about his handling of the report and whether he came to a conclusion before the report was completed.
Mabus admitted he had not read the full study when he overrode the Marine Corps’ request for an exemption.
“You said ‘I do not see any reason for an exemption’ the day after the study was published. Based on what?” Sullivan asked.
“The conclusions,” Mabus said.
“Did you read the study?” Sen. Sullivan asked.
“I read the study,” Mabus said.
“Did you read the study before you stated that?” Sen. Sullivan asked.
“I had read the conclusions that the Marines drew from the study prior to that, and those conclusions which were based on averages and not on individual Marines,” Mabus said.
Sen. Sullivan then asked Mabus’s rush for gender-integration of the military contradicted a report on the effect of gender-integration in boot camps commissioned by the Department of Defense and completed in December 1997, known as the Kassebaum-Baker Report.
“I think that’s a completely irrelevant point, Senator,” Mabus said.
“You know, Secretary Mabus, this would have been a lot easier if you had not called in the press immediately and debunked what many of us view as a legitimate study without even reading it, and I don’t believe that you read a thousand page document in one day. I’m sorry, but I don’t believe it,” Sen. John McCain (R., Ariz.) said later in the hearing."
LINK
Mabus had to back off, the freaking moron.
Senators Criticize Ray Mabus for Neglecting Marine Study About Women in Combat
Members of the Senate Armed Services Committee grilled Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus on Monday for neglecting a study by the Marine Corps about the integration of women into all facets of the service, including boot camp.
The Marine Corps completed a multi-million dollar study in December that found that mixed-gender units performed poorly in ground combat tasks compared to all-male units. It has been the policy of the Marine Corps to keep ground combat all-male, and to separate men and women in enlisted basic training.
Secretary Mabus criticized the Marine Corps after it released the report, and after Secretary of Defense Ash Carter declined to exempt Marines from the requirement to open all positions to women, Mabus demanded that Marine Corps boot camp cease separating men and women for training.
At Tuesday’s hearing, Marine reserve officer Sen. Dan Sullivan (R., Alaska) questioned Mabus about his handling of the report and whether he came to a conclusion before the report was completed.
Mabus admitted he had not read the full study when he overrode the Marine Corps’ request for an exemption.
“You said ‘I do not see any reason for an exemption’ the day after the study was published. Based on what?” Sullivan asked.
“The conclusions,” Mabus said.
“Did you read the study?” Sen. Sullivan asked.
“I read the study,” Mabus said.
“Did you read the study before you stated that?” Sen. Sullivan asked.
“I had read the conclusions that the Marines drew from the study prior to that, and those conclusions which were based on averages and not on individual Marines,” Mabus said.
Sen. Sullivan then asked Mabus’s rush for gender-integration of the military contradicted a report on the effect of gender-integration in boot camps commissioned by the Department of Defense and completed in December 1997, known as the Kassebaum-Baker Report.
“I think that’s a completely irrelevant point, Senator,” Mabus said.
“You know, Secretary Mabus, this would have been a lot easier if you had not called in the press immediately and debunked what many of us view as a legitimate study without even reading it, and I don’t believe that you read a thousand page document in one day. I’m sorry, but I don’t believe it,” Sen. John McCain (R., Ariz.) said later in the hearing."
LINK
Mabus had to back off, the freaking moron.
Posted on 11/17/16 at 9:29 am to Jbird
quote:The PFT is nothing but a measurement of fitness, if it weeds people out so be it.
So PFT isn't about fitness but a weeding device in your opinion?
Posted on 11/17/16 at 9:31 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:This would render the transgender issue a moot point (at least in the PFT realm).
Default to male standards, in my opinion. If this is here to stay, it's time to get rid of male/female standards anyway.
Posted on 11/17/16 at 9:32 am to Jbird
quote:
So PFT isn't about fitness but a weeding device in your opinion?
Absolutely. Passing the PFT/CFT is ridiculously easy with minimal effort. If you're (collective you) only active enough to pass, or even only enough to do well, you're failing. In my opinion, of course.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)