Started By
Message

re: T or F: If Rubio was candidate and elected POTUS there would be Protests/Riots?

Posted on 11/14/16 at 8:23 am to
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 8:23 am to
Normally I would agree with you. However, the Progressives are taking this to a new low. They are literally undermining our electoral process. And no one in this current administration is calling for calm and acceptance.

Sorry, no sale this time.
Posted by PorkSammich
North FL
Member since Sep 2013
14775 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 8:24 am to
Rubio might have won in the biggest landslide in history so doubtful there would be many protest.

Also, the Dems and media are responsible for framing Trump as a sexist, racist, rapist and the mindless among us take it to heart.

Protesting democracy is lazy and idiotic.
Posted by AU_Right
Member since Oct 2016
3048 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 8:29 am to
Not as much, because he would have never even touched some of Trump's (media overblown) controversial ideas (ILLEGAL immigration, refugees, etc). Basically done what every politician does...tell everyone what the want to hear. Not to mention his heart would have exploded from all the adderall & blow.
Posted by UncleFestersLegs
Member since Nov 2010
11606 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 8:29 am to
quote:

You answered your own question. They would have found a reason to oppose him as well.

That happens pretty much every election in history.
Yep
McCain: racist, bigot & homophobe
Black Congressmen Declare Racism In Palin’s Rhetoric
Is Mitt Romney a Racist?
Posted by SwaggerCopter
H TINE HOL IT DINE
Member since Dec 2012
27243 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 8:32 am to
quote:

Hard to say.

Rubio as he is currently perceived: probably no protests.

Rubio after 8 months of general election lambasting from the media: probably perceived as a white supremacist (even though he's Cuban) and protests might happen.



This is such a good point. People often sited the different candidates that supposedly would have easily beaten Hillary according to polls. But all of those candidates hadn't been drug through the mud like Trump.
Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
22504 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 8:42 am to
quote:


Hard to say.

Rubio as he is currently perceived: probably no protests.

Rubio after 8 months of general election lambasting from the media: probably perceived as a white supremacist (even though he's Cuban) and protests might happen.




This is my point. The media has made Trump out to be the bogeyman (or literally Hitler). I would assume the media would be hammering him on something
Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
22504 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 8:47 am to
quote:

Riots, no, but a few protests littered on college campuses across the nation. Certainly nothing as severe as what we saw in Portland.


But why? Wouldn't Rubio's policies on LGBT and AA issues be less far less desirable than Trumps?
Posted by mtntiger
Asheville, NC
Member since Oct 2003
27214 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 8:47 am to
True.

This has been the plan all along. The powers that be wanted Hillary.

If they didn't get their way, then all hell was gonna break loose regardless of who got elected.

Don't kid yourself. Rubio would have been made to seem like a cross between the Unabomber and Ted Bundy after accepting the nomination. That was the Dem gameplan. Make whoever is the GOP nominee seem like Hitler to the masses with help from a complicit media.

Remember these protests didn't just spring up. They were planned with ready-made signage and slogans, and they were planned months ago.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
114048 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 8:48 am to
True

Every Republican is literally Hitler when they actually run for president. Only a hypothetical candidate is not literally Hitler.
Posted by baobabtiger
Member since May 2009
4781 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 8:48 am to
They protested the bush's like crazy. Today we know how much they are like the Dems.
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
67023 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 8:50 am to
True. There were go to be riots if Hillary and the Democratic machine lost no matter who the candidate was.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
150557 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 8:54 am to
This is such a waste of time. All of these threads asking if Rubio, or Romney, ran they would have won are ridiculous. NONE of them could have touched PA, MI,WI.

And to the OP question: If ANYONE BUT Crooked Hillary would have won they would have been protested. It is silly because none of the 16 would have made it before resigning like cucks for some made-up story produced to smear them. The media would have ate them whole and alive and they would have cowered as career politicians. Huckabee or Cruz would have never made it out the primary gate because of their religion.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
104029 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 8:57 am to
quote:

They protested the bush's like crazy.


They've admitted, that was just "crying wolf" - along with the attacks on McCain, Romney, etc. They are REALLY SERIOUS this time.
Posted by bamafan1001
Member since Jun 2011
15783 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 8:59 am to
True
Posted by shinerfan
Duckworld(Earth-616)
Member since Sep 2009
23005 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 8:59 am to
Yes, because Soros' hired thugs have fundamentally changed Anerican democracy. He got away with Occupy Wall Street, he got away with BLM burning cities, he got away with mounting assaults on Trump supporters. I don't give a shite about prosecuting Hillary, but there is nothing on Trump's plate more important than ending Soros. Paid mobs played a huge role in the destruction of the Roman Republic. We have to resist the temptation to fight fire with fire and hope a real AG like Rudy or Trey Gowdy steps up to the plate and restores the rule of law.
This post was edited on 11/14/16 at 9:03 am
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
70004 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 8:59 am to
quote:

Rubio would have been labeled Hitler if he had been the nominee. Just like Mittens and McCain.





Exactly. Every Republican candidate, regardless of race/religion/sexual orientation, would have been demonized by the MSM.

Now, Trump made their job easier with some controversial statements and some 12 year old audio. But no republican is gonna get fair and balanced treatment by the MSM.
Posted by Mike da Tigah
Bravo Romeo Lima Alpha
Member since Feb 2005
59682 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 9:02 am to
Only those who are a very real threat to the establishment and their system come under such condemnation and opposition. You can talk about it all you like, but only those who truly present a real threat are the ones who will come under an all out attack.

Rubio talks a good game, but I don't think they fear him like they do Trump.
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
70004 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 9:07 am to
quote:

Rubio talks a good game, but I don't think they fear him like they do Trump.





They didn't fear Rubio because they didn't have to. Again, even Carly Fiorina would have been ripped to shreds by the MSM. She'd become a racist, homophobic white nationalist within a day of getting the nomination.

Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
114280 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 9:10 am to
But he didnt.
Posted by tigress4life
BR
Member since May 2007
956 posts
Posted on 11/14/16 at 9:10 am to
Yesh there would be riots with any Republican elected. Or did you forget the whole "occupy summer", that was to organize, prepare and plan for what is happening now. The organizers of these groups ARE PAID to get protestors out to harass, intimidate all opposition.
This post was edited on 11/14/16 at 9:12 am
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram