Started By
Message
locked post

Why don't Victorias Secret models have any tits? (NSFW)

Posted on 12/16/15 at 9:58 pm
Posted by accnodefense
Trump Fan
Member since Dec 2010
6279 posts
Posted on 12/16/15 at 9:58 pm
Pretty much every Victoria's Secret model is flat chested

They all need to wear push up bras, and even then still have use airbrushing/makeup/photoshop to make it look like they have tits

You think they would pick models with a rack to demonstrate what their bras can do, but instead they go with women who have small tits.

Here is their front page right now, example of what I am talking about, itty bitty titties. Apparently the girl on the right is wearing a bra that gives you a 2 cup size boost, even after that boost the tits look small.

Posted by Liverflipper
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2014
186 posts
Posted on 12/16/15 at 9:59 pm to
Because it's all about the entire package, not just the postage.

Get with it...
Posted by DMagic
#ChowderPosse
Member since Aug 2010
48846 posts
Posted on 12/16/15 at 9:59 pm to
Why is every thread you start terrible?
Posted by Kcoyote
Member since Jan 2012
12050 posts
Posted on 12/16/15 at 10:00 pm to
In general high fashion models/lingerie models are not supposed to have big tits. They're supposed to be tall, thin, and pretty flat chested. It's how you make it in the modeling world. Most of those girls have gone through the gambit of modeling and are at the peak of the modeling world.

Now most swimsuit models, big tits all day.
Posted by Hugo Stiglitz
Member since Oct 2010
72937 posts
Posted on 12/16/15 at 10:00 pm to
Balance.
Posted by accnodefense
Trump Fan
Member since Dec 2010
6279 posts
Posted on 12/16/15 at 10:01 pm to
quote:

In general high fashion models/lingerie models are not supposed to have big tits. They're supposed to be tall, thin, and pretty flat chested. It's how you make it in the modeling world.


Why though? What difference does chest size make?
Posted by RockAndRollDetective
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2014
4506 posts
Posted on 12/16/15 at 10:01 pm to
Yeah, those VS models just aren't up to message board poster standards are they?
Posted by kilo1234
Member since May 2014
1431 posts
Posted on 12/16/15 at 10:01 pm to
Only on the OT do people bitch about Victoria's Secret models.
Posted by accnodefense
Trump Fan
Member since Dec 2010
6279 posts
Posted on 12/16/15 at 10:02 pm to
quote:

Yeah, those VS models just aren't up to message board poster standards are they?


Lol they are still very attractive, just lacking in the bust department
Posted by TheAlmightySmash
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2014
5485 posts
Posted on 12/16/15 at 10:02 pm to
kinda hard to have natural DD's and maintain 6% body fat
Posted by chesty
Flap City C.C.
Member since Oct 2012
12731 posts
Posted on 12/16/15 at 10:02 pm to
They're gorgeous... Besides everyone knows you marry for the body and the arse,
You can always put the tits on later.
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
70239 posts
Posted on 12/16/15 at 10:02 pm to
It must be a real burden to be so much smarter than all the professional marketers that Victoria's Secret uses.

If you are so smart, why are they wealthy and successful and you are ranting via the Internet?

Posted by Kcoyote
Member since Jan 2012
12050 posts
Posted on 12/16/15 at 10:03 pm to
quote:

Why though? What difference does chest size make?



The people who make high fashion dresses don't account for large tits normally, and they make one dress for each look. There are many more tall thin women with smaller tits than bigger tits. It's sort of a natural selection thing. So the industry standard changed to smaller tits because accounting for different boobages is hard.
Posted by whit
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
11025 posts
Posted on 12/16/15 at 10:03 pm to
Oh but they do! They're just not as meaty.
Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 12/16/15 at 10:04 pm to
That's like the point of the bras, right?
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
38534 posts
Posted on 12/16/15 at 10:16 pm to
quote:

kinda hard to have natural DD's and maintain 6% body fat


This.

Fake tits are a no go and big naturals are nearly impossible to have with the amount of body fat one must have to be a vs model. You know all those Instagram hotties with that skinny waist and big natural boobs? They are still no where near as skinny as a vs model.
This post was edited on 12/16/15 at 10:18 pm
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 12/16/15 at 10:18 pm to
quote:

Pretty much every Victoria's Secret model is flat chested


Your standards are just a tad too high.
Posted by chinhoyang
Member since Jun 2011
25042 posts
Posted on 12/16/15 at 10:21 pm to
The biggest reason Playboy rejected models who passed the first screening (e.g. after obvious fatties were eliminated) was bad boob jobs.

Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
39011 posts
Posted on 12/16/15 at 10:22 pm to
I've always assumed the modeling world wanted their chicks to have a body built like a 12 yr old boy
Posted by Jet12
Tweet, tweet, tweet, two steps.
Member since Nov 2010
20554 posts
Posted on 12/16/15 at 10:22 pm to
They're supposed to be rail-thin. You can't really have (natural) boobs if you're rail-thin.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram