- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
A-hole driver charged with aggravated assault (UPDATE) (double line enforcer)
Posted on 10/20/15 at 8:38 am
Posted on 10/20/15 at 8:38 am
other thread was anchored. Posting here. Knew he committed a crime, he could have killed them. Will leave this and let y'all discuss.
LINK
Good for him. Rot in hell
The driver of the bike was also charged.
William Crum
Then why say "I don't care" ?
I think a jury sees this video and they will find him guilty.
LINK
![](https://cdn.tegna-tv.com/-mm-/826a7eda430ccb21c8b6c1b6bbf9cae84f4a377e/c=99-183-1287-1076&r=x408&c=540x405/local/-/media/2015/10/20/WFAA/WFAA/635808967535939642-1019-william-crum202.jpg)
![](https://cdn.tegna-tv.com/-mm-/799d8dd09940ed54ff54e338a5f6d437e052b4d7/c=0-21-473-376&r=x408&c=540x405/local/-/media/2015/10/20/WFAA/WFAA/635809227152912634-william-crum.png)
quote:
"Man, I wish I could go back in time, but you can't," said Crum, who identified himself Monday as the driver in the video.
Crum was arrested and charged with two counts of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon on Monday afternoon. His bond has been set at $150,000.
Good for him. Rot in hell
The driver of the bike was also charged.
quote:
As for Sanders, police say he's now been cited for passing in a no-passing zone and driving with an invalid license.
William Crum
quote:
He told News 8 some sort of insect bit him near his groin as he was driving Saturday, which caused him to jerk the wheel and swerve into the left lane. He said he had absolutely no idea a motorcycle was on his side.
Then why say "I don't care" ?
I think a jury sees this video and they will find him guilty.
This post was edited on 10/20/15 at 8:47 am
Posted on 10/20/15 at 8:40 am to Napoleon
Where´s the dude who says it was attempted murder????????????????????????????????????
Posted on 10/20/15 at 8:40 am to Napoleon
He's standing by the "wasp" story, apparently. I can't say with 100% certainty, but the video looked like he hit the bike deliberately.
Posted on 10/20/15 at 8:41 am to Napoleon
quote:
he could of killed them
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/icons/casty.gif)
Could "have killed them.
Posted on 10/20/15 at 8:42 am to Napoleon
quote:
could of killed them
Uh oh
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconspank.gif)
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 10/20/15 at 8:42 am to Napoleon
Was the biker issued a ticket?
Posted on 10/20/15 at 8:43 am to Napoleon
I hope he dies of wasp AIDS
Posted on 10/20/15 at 8:45 am to Napoleon
His behavior was not warranted but makes you wonder what was not shown in video that prompted the old man's actions.
Posted on 10/20/15 at 9:00 am to Napoleon
I have a question, that sort of indirectly involves this case...let's assume that the car was driving slower, and he was in fact attempting to make a left turn, would he be in the wrong for clipping the bike? I get that the bike had illegally passed in a no passing zone...but, he still gained possession of the lane first, and in Louisiana, if you're making a left turn and cause a collision with a vehicle passing to the left you are the guilty party, if it's deemed that the passing vehicle has possession of the lane first.
Posted on 10/20/15 at 9:03 am to Napoleon
Glad to hear he was charged and to see the biker was cited. Now we can all move on to the next daily tragedy.
Posted on 10/20/15 at 9:35 am to Napoleon
Hopefully he is acquitted. BS charge.
The biker has no fault in this?
The biker has no fault in this?
Posted on 10/20/15 at 9:49 am to Napoleon
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 10/20/15 at 10:49 am to Napoleon
Seems like the following would be the appropriate charges in Louisiana. Note the boyfriend/victim did not suffer serious injuries but the girlfriend did. An overzealous prosecutor (see Florida) would likely go for attempted 2nd degree murder. I think 1 count of aggravated 2nd degree battery and 1 count of aggravated battery would be the most appropriate charges. I can't stand when other jurisdictions use assault to define what is a battery. Assault= a reasonable apprehension of imminent harm. Battery= the actual touching/contact which causes harm. This is clearly a battery.
LA RS-§34.7. Aggravated second degree battery
A. Aggravated second degree battery is a battery committed with a dangerous weapon when the offender intentionally inflicts serious bodily injury.
B. For purposes of this Section, the following words shall have the following meanings:
[omitted]
(3) "Serious bodily injury" means bodily injury which involves unconsciousness, extreme physical pain or protracted and obvious disfigurement, or protracted loss or impairment of the function of a bodily member, organ, or mental faculty, or a substantial risk of death.
C. Whoever commits the crime of aggravated second degree battery shall be fined not more than ten thousand dollars or imprisoned, with or without hard labor, for not more than fifteen years, or both. At least one year of the sentence imposed shall be served without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence if the offender knew or should have known that the victim is an active member of the United States Armed Forces or is a disabled veteran and the aggravated second degree battery was committed because of that status.
- Not going to cite 2nd Degree Murder but all that is necessary is "the specific intent to kill or inflict great bodily harm". This would be the most difficult to prove but I think it's reasonable to believe he intended to inflict great bodily harm. Get a few bikers on the jury and you probably get a conviction for attempted second degree murder.
LA RS-§27. Attempt; penalties; attempt on peace officer; enhanced penalties
A. Any person who, having a specific intent to commit a crime, does or omits an act for the purpose of and tending directly toward the accomplishing of his object is guilty of an attempt to commit the offense intended; and it shall be immaterial whether, under the circumstances, he would have actually accomplished his purpose.
The people that believe the old man should not be charged because the biker broke the law are the most ridiculous people in this thread. If a drunk driver swerves out of his lane hitting and killing someone in the opposite lane who was speeding, let's say he was going 80 mph in a 70 mph speed zone, then the drunk driver should not get charged with any crime according to y'all. Get your heads out of your asses because that makes no sense! Now in the civil suit that will definitely be a factor in determining/allocating fault, but that won't affect the criminal charges.
LA RS-§34.7. Aggravated second degree battery
A. Aggravated second degree battery is a battery committed with a dangerous weapon when the offender intentionally inflicts serious bodily injury.
B. For purposes of this Section, the following words shall have the following meanings:
[omitted]
(3) "Serious bodily injury" means bodily injury which involves unconsciousness, extreme physical pain or protracted and obvious disfigurement, or protracted loss or impairment of the function of a bodily member, organ, or mental faculty, or a substantial risk of death.
C. Whoever commits the crime of aggravated second degree battery shall be fined not more than ten thousand dollars or imprisoned, with or without hard labor, for not more than fifteen years, or both. At least one year of the sentence imposed shall be served without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence if the offender knew or should have known that the victim is an active member of the United States Armed Forces or is a disabled veteran and the aggravated second degree battery was committed because of that status.
- Not going to cite 2nd Degree Murder but all that is necessary is "the specific intent to kill or inflict great bodily harm". This would be the most difficult to prove but I think it's reasonable to believe he intended to inflict great bodily harm. Get a few bikers on the jury and you probably get a conviction for attempted second degree murder.
LA RS-§27. Attempt; penalties; attempt on peace officer; enhanced penalties
A. Any person who, having a specific intent to commit a crime, does or omits an act for the purpose of and tending directly toward the accomplishing of his object is guilty of an attempt to commit the offense intended; and it shall be immaterial whether, under the circumstances, he would have actually accomplished his purpose.
The people that believe the old man should not be charged because the biker broke the law are the most ridiculous people in this thread. If a drunk driver swerves out of his lane hitting and killing someone in the opposite lane who was speeding, let's say he was going 80 mph in a 70 mph speed zone, then the drunk driver should not get charged with any crime according to y'all. Get your heads out of your asses because that makes no sense! Now in the civil suit that will definitely be a factor in determining/allocating fault, but that won't affect the criminal charges.
This post was edited on 10/20/15 at 10:50 am
Posted on 10/20/15 at 11:11 am to Napoleon
Good. Both are idiots and retards.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)