- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Where would you rank this Warriors team in history?
Posted on 6/17/15 at 1:29 am to RLDSC FAN
Posted on 6/17/15 at 1:29 am to RLDSC FAN
quote:agreed. The only thing that tops what the 2001 laker team was doing
the spurs are their peak last year may have been the best team I've ever seen. it was scary good and a joy to watch.
2
Posted on 6/17/15 at 1:29 am to BigBrod81
quote:
Which version of the 2014 Spurs team? The one that was pushed to 7 games by Mavs in the first round or the one who beat the Spurs in 5?
Either.
This Cavs teams wasn't that good.
Posted on 6/17/15 at 1:29 am to WestCoastAg
The good ole days 
Posted on 6/17/15 at 1:30 am to RLDSC FAN
I know man, I'm just happy that Gasol trade made high school fun 
Posted on 6/17/15 at 1:31 am to imraged
quote:
This right here. 3rd best overall season record in NBA history. People are letting their perception be swayed too strongly by the fact that they didn't sweep a decimated Cleveland team. Ignoring the fact that they were going against the best player in the NBA with tons of Finals experience and they had none.
Posted on 6/17/15 at 1:33 am to BayouBengals03
If I were to take a stab at it, at their peaks
1. 2014 spurs
2. 2001 lakers
3. 2013 heat
4. 2008 celtics
5. 2015 warriors
and then just because I want to put a second laker team here
6. 2000 lakers
1. 2014 spurs
2. 2001 lakers
3. 2013 heat
4. 2008 celtics
5. 2015 warriors
and then just because I want to put a second laker team here
6. 2000 lakers
This post was edited on 6/17/15 at 1:38 am
Posted on 6/17/15 at 1:34 am to WestCoastAg
quote:
3. 2012 heat
you think that team was better than the 2013 version? That was lebron at his absolute peak. they won 29 straight games that year.
Posted on 6/17/15 at 1:35 am to BayouBengals03
No doubt but the Spurs kinda slept walked through that Mavs series & revenge was a huge motivating factor against the Heat. The Spurs would probably sleep walk against this wounded Cavs team & Lebron would manage to account for at least one win. I don't think the Spurs would sweep.
Posted on 6/17/15 at 1:37 am to RLDSC FAN
I honestly meant to type 2013 on my phone
That was lebron at his greatest and they took down a legit spurs team in the finals. I think it was either here or on the SEC rant OT thread that I was going off on how much I loved that heat team
That was lebron at his greatest and they took down a legit spurs team in the finals. I think it was either here or on the SEC rant OT thread that I was going off on how much I loved that heat team
This post was edited on 6/17/15 at 1:39 am
Posted on 6/17/15 at 1:39 am to WestCoastAg
quote:Where would you put the Warriors all-time?
If I were to take a stab at it, at their peaks 1. 2014 spurs 2. 2001 lakers 3. 2013 heat 4. 2008 celtics 5. 2015 warriors and then just because I want to put a second laker team here 6. 2000 lakers
Posted on 6/17/15 at 1:41 am to RLDSC FAN
Just for reference, not to answer the question (since numbers alone don't tell the complete story)
Top teams by season winning %
Golden State is in the top 10, tied with 4 other teams for regular season wins in the 82 game season era.
Top teams by season winning %
Golden State is in the top 10, tied with 4 other teams for regular season wins in the 82 game season era.
Posted on 6/17/15 at 1:42 am to ReauxlTide222
I put them at 5...
Posted on 6/17/15 at 1:43 am to WestCoastAg
quote:Wow. Top 5 all-time and not a single team ahead of them played before year 2000. That's bold my man.
I put them at 5...
Posted on 6/17/15 at 1:44 am to WestCoastAg
quote:
I put them at 5...
all time, really?
Posted on 6/17/15 at 1:44 am to WestCoastAg
quote:
That was lebron at his greatest and they took down a legit spurs team in the finals.
Really? I'd say that, even though his shot count shot up, this series was Lebron at his best easily. With any help, the Cavs take it. Call it an excuse, but when Dellavedova and JR Smith, who I believe has the lowest basketball IQ of all time, are your two biggest threats after Lebron, a team like Golden State losing the series shouldn't ever even be in doubt. Before Kyrie got hurt, people were calling for a sweep or GS in 5. Lebron carried the Cavs to game 6 and was a stat machine.
Posted on 6/17/15 at 1:45 am to WestCoastAg
quote:
quote:
the spurs are their peak last year may have been the best team I've ever seen. it was scary good and a joy to watch.
agreed. The only thing that tops what the 2001 laker team was doing
The 95-96 Bulls? Talk about scary good. That team was a monster.
Posted on 6/17/15 at 1:46 am to Dijkstra
quote:
Really? I'
he meant during the regular season. 2013 Lebron was better than this years version.
Posted on 6/17/15 at 1:46 am to Dijkstra
quote:Alright, this thread is confusing me. I'm gonna blame it on me being ignorant and bow out.
Really? I'd say that, even though his shot count shot up, this series was Lebron at his best easily. With any help, the Cavs take it. Call it an excuse, but when Dellavedova and JR Smith, who I believe has the lowest basketball IQ of all time, are your two biggest threats after Lebron, a team like Golden State losing the series shouldn't ever even be in doubt. Before Kyrie got hurt, people were calling for a sweep or GS in 5. Lebron carried the Cavs to game 6 and was a stat machine.
Posted on 6/17/15 at 1:48 am to ReauxlTide222
Eh, I misread the comment
Uhh I don't know, they are 5th in our century, right off the bat they are behind the 67 celtics and the 72 lakers. Then the 82 sixers. Then the 87 lakers happen and the 86 celtics. Then the 90 pistons happen. Then we have the 93, 96, and the 97 bulls. They fit somewhere after all of those
Uhh I don't know, they are 5th in our century, right off the bat they are behind the 67 celtics and the 72 lakers. Then the 82 sixers. Then the 87 lakers happen and the 86 celtics. Then the 90 pistons happen. Then we have the 93, 96, and the 97 bulls. They fit somewhere after all of those
Posted on 6/17/15 at 1:49 am to randomways
quote:they were before my nba watching time so I can't comment on them when discussing teams that I have seen
The 95-96 Bulls?
Page 5 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News