Started By
Message

re: Where would you rank this Warriors team in history?

Posted on 6/17/15 at 1:14 am to
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83862 posts
Posted on 6/17/15 at 1:14 am to
quote:

I mean that is what happened. Do I really need to go hunt down the amount of uncontested jumpers they missed in those games? Hint: It was a lot.
And that screams top team ever to you?

quote:

You are seriously making me want smash my face in to a table with this shite.
Again, this is good stuff right here. You're selling me. The West bow:
Posted by chRxis
None of your fricking business
Member since Feb 2008
23811 posts
Posted on 6/17/15 at 1:15 am to
quote:

The Cavs won those two games by playing out of character. They were forced by injuries to nuke their gameplan and what they came up with worked for a time because it was the antithesis of Warrior's ball.

and if you don't think they STILL would have slowed it down, WITH Love and Irving, then you have to be retarded....

if you and I both know that GS wants to get out and run, and the one way to stop that is to play half court basketball, then i'm pretty damn sure Blatt knows it too... and if he doesn't, i KNOW lebron knows....

i think you would have seen the Cavs do the exact same thing they did, but with 2 All-Star players to add to their squad... that's kind of a big deal when you are trying to win a championship...
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83862 posts
Posted on 6/17/15 at 1:16 am to
quote:


2001 Lakers
2008 Celtics
2014 Spurs
2015 Warriors
2012 Heat

Top 5 teams of the century.
You're REALLY selling these Warriors short in the eyes of everyone but me and a couple others in this thread.
Posted by RTR America
Memphis, TN
Member since Aug 2012
39600 posts
Posted on 6/17/15 at 1:16 am to
quote:

i agree, and in fact, i would take that dallas team with Dirk at his best over this golden state team.

Golden State losing 2 games to this dog shite cleveland team, and also allowing game 1 and 5 wins to be close calls really makes me doubt the greatness of the '15 warriors.


Posted by imraged
Member since Nov 2010
2343 posts
Posted on 6/17/15 at 1:17 am to


'01 Lakers don't make the cut because they were just an above average regular season team.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83862 posts
Posted on 6/17/15 at 1:18 am to
Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 6/17/15 at 1:19 am to
That was in no particular order.

Statistically, the Warriors are probably the 2nd best team of the century. However, I don't know if I have them that high by the eye test. I for sure think the 2008 Celtics and 2014 Spurs are better.
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
51889 posts
Posted on 6/17/15 at 1:20 am to
quote:

'01 Lakers don't make the cut because they were just an above average regular season team.



the problem was that was the year the kobe/shaq feud really began to rear it's head. Kobe was refusing to back down to shaq, even saying he's better off playing elsewhere. Once he decided to work within the system, they just took off and destroyed the WC in the playoffs.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83862 posts
Posted on 6/17/15 at 1:20 am to
Arguing how the Cavs would have done with Kyrie and Love is a topic for another thread IMO. I was just attempting to show how this GS team isn't a top 10 GOAT. I didn't realize people thought GS would have looked amazing if Kryie and Love played....frick me right?
Posted by RTR America
Memphis, TN
Member since Aug 2012
39600 posts
Posted on 6/17/15 at 1:20 am to
I have trouble placing last year's Spurs team because they got taken to 7 by an 8 seed and probably would have lost to OKC in the WCF if Ibaka was healthy.

Them at their peak was otherworldly though.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83862 posts
Posted on 6/17/15 at 1:22 am to
quote:

Statistically, the Warriors are probably the 2nd best team of the century. However, I don't know if I have them that high by the eye test. I for sure think the 2008 Celtics and 2014 Spurs are better.
No doubt they can be and are impressive as all hell. And not to be a dick, but we're talking about them being at least top 10 of all time right now. I really don't think they could beat the teams that were THAT good.
This post was edited on 6/17/15 at 1:24 am
Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 6/17/15 at 1:23 am to
The 2014 Spurs would have swept this Cavs team. I think you have to account for teams at their peak when you look at this too.
Posted by BigBrod81
Houma
Member since Sep 2010
18972 posts
Posted on 6/17/15 at 1:23 am to
Posted by RTR America
Memphis, TN
Member since Aug 2012
39600 posts
Posted on 6/17/15 at 1:26 am to
quote:

The 2014 Spurs would have swept this Cavs team. I think you have to account for teams at their peak when you look at this too.


Oh I agree, but I think that just has more to do with the pedigree of the teams. The furthest this Warriors team had ever been in the playoffs was the 2nd round a few years ago.

Pop, Timmy, TP, Manu, etc. had all been there, done that.
Posted by OKtiger
Tulsa, OK
Member since Nov 2014
8595 posts
Posted on 6/17/15 at 1:26 am to
Well then would you pick the 2014 Spurs during the Finals last year or GS sometime this regular season when they were at their peak (Klay scoring 37 scoring in a quarter)?
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145506 posts
Posted on 6/17/15 at 1:27 am to
quote:

I for sure think the 2008 Celtics and 2014 Spurs are better
2000 and 2001 laker teams as well
This post was edited on 6/17/15 at 1:28 am
Posted by Dijkstra
Michael J. Fox's location in time.
Member since Sep 2007
8738 posts
Posted on 6/17/15 at 1:27 am to
quote:

I don't think the WC was absurd.


It absolutely was. It came down to the last game to decide the 8th seed in the West, and the Pelicans got in and finished with a record of 45-37 playing in the Southwest division where everyone in the division got in. The Nets were the 8th seed with a 38-44 record. Pelicans had a better record than seeds 5-8 in the East, played in a much more competitive division, and still had to fight to make it in at an 8th seed. After playing in this crazy competitive division and playing well enough to survive and make the playoffs, they get swept in the first round with only one (painful, heartbreaking) game even being remotely close against the 1st seed. Don't forget the they split four games with the 2nd seed in the West, Houston, and one of their losses was a two point loss. The West's 8th seed went .500 in a division where teams averaged 52.2 wins this season and over .500 in the regular season. This is just my personal Pelicans fandom speaking, too. The numbers are worse.

Teams in the East had an average of 38.46 wins (.469) during the regular season while the playoff teams in the East averaged 47.125 wins (.575). The average number of wins during the regular season for teams in the West was 44.533 wins (.543) while the West's playoff teams averaged 53.75 wins (.655). Just from these numbers alone, the entire West averaged damn near just as many wins as the East's playoff teams, and four teams in the West won 30 or less games. The West was stacked.

quote:

All 6 Bulls teams beat this GS team....no?


No. 91-92 Bulls could have lost to this team, and it wouldn't be shocking. They pretty much struggled just as much with Clyde as GS did with Lebron, and Clyde didn't play anywhere near as well as Lebron did in this series.


Posted by BigBrod81
Houma
Member since Sep 2010
18972 posts
Posted on 6/17/15 at 1:28 am to
quote:

The 2014 Spurs would have swept this Cavs team.


Which version of the 2014 Spurs team? The one that was pushed to 7 games by Mavs in the first round or the one who beat the Spurs in 5?
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
51889 posts
Posted on 6/17/15 at 1:28 am to
quote:

Well then would you pick the 2014 Spurs during the Finals last year or GS sometime this regular season when they were at their peak (Klay scoring 37 scoring in a quarter)?


the spurs are their peak last year may have been the best team I've ever seen. it was scary good and a joy to watch.
Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 6/17/15 at 1:28 am to
I don't really get caught up in the order of rankings.

All I know is... in whatever order, these are the top five teams of the century:

2001 Lakers
2008 Celtics
2012 Heat
2014 Spurs
2015 Warriors
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram