- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Order to watch Star Wars Movies
Posted on 2/10/15 at 8:39 pm
Posted on 2/10/15 at 8:39 pm
I have only seen a couple of the Star Wars movies and its been quite a long time since then. Planning on watching them all soon and not sure if I should start with Episode 1 and follow the chronological order or go by the Theatrical release order.
Thoughts?
Thoughts?
Posted on 2/10/15 at 8:42 pm to Hermit Crab
4-6 first and then don't watch 1-3 because they suck.
Posted on 2/10/15 at 8:43 pm to Hermit Crab
4 5 2 3 6 not 1, not ever. Or so i have heard.
Posted on 2/10/15 at 8:43 pm to Hermit Crab
Most will say 4-6 skip 1-3.
I would roll 1-6. If you aren't invested in the original series, I don't think you will hate 1-3 like most people on here.
I would roll 1-6. If you aren't invested in the original series, I don't think you will hate 1-3 like most people on here.
Posted on 2/10/15 at 8:47 pm to TIGERSTORM
quote:
4 5 1 2 3 6
Best modern way to watch them.
Posted on 2/10/15 at 8:50 pm to Hermit Crab
first time through I would say 4-6 than 1-3. Find a pre redone #6 the change at the end was so stupid.
Posted on 2/10/15 at 8:51 pm to catholictigerfan
BTW where does 7 fit in this timeline?
Posted on 2/10/15 at 8:51 pm to TigerMyth36
quote:
I would roll 1-6. If you aren't invested in the original series, I don't think you will hate 1-3 like most people on here.
This. I enjoy the Star Wars films but I don't have an affinity to them like their super fans do so 1-3 never really bothered me as much as it does some people.
Sometimes I thought it'd be cool to be able to go back and watch 1-6 in order without having seen 4-6 first.
Of course, simply because of real life technological improvements watching 4-6 last may make the films feel "slower"
Posted on 2/10/15 at 8:52 pm to VolsMissthe90s
quote:
4-6 first and then don't watch 1-3 because they suck.
I was just going to post this exact thing.
Seriously, I don't think I've ever re-watched any of 1-3 after first seeing them other than maybe a minute or two here or there. And I really have no desire to. I've watched 4-6 numerous times though and still enjoy them.
Posted on 2/10/15 at 8:56 pm to Methuselah
A New Hope
Empire Strikes Back
Return of the Jedi
A Phantom Menace
Plinkett's review of A Phantom Menace
Attack of the Clones
Plinkett's review of Attack of the Clones
Revenge of the Sith
Plinkett's review of Revenge of the sith
Empire Strikes Back
Return of the Jedi
A Phantom Menace
Plinkett's review of A Phantom Menace
Attack of the Clones
Plinkett's review of Attack of the Clones
Revenge of the Sith
Plinkett's review of Revenge of the sith
Posted on 2/10/15 at 8:58 pm to Hermit Crab
Oh, and Han shot first dammit.
Posted on 2/10/15 at 9:11 pm to Hermit Crab
4-6 then 1-3
The prequels are terrible, but they aren't as bad as people say they are. Well. They kind of are. But you should watch them once. They have some solid moments.
Whatever you do, make sure you watch the original as released in theatres cuts of 4-6
The prequels are terrible, but they aren't as bad as people say they are. Well. They kind of are. But you should watch them once. They have some solid moments.
Whatever you do, make sure you watch the original as released in theatres cuts of 4-6
This post was edited on 2/10/15 at 9:12 pm
Posted on 2/10/15 at 9:54 pm to constant cough
4-6. The end.
Watch 1-3 after that if you feel you must and have curiosity.
Watch 1-3 after that if you feel you must and have curiosity.
Posted on 2/10/15 at 10:00 pm to Fun Bunch
Machete Order. 4-5-2-3-6. Watch 1 if you want but view it as its own stand-alone piece like the Clone Wars cartoon series.
Posted on 2/10/15 at 10:00 pm to saintsfan92612
Don't forget Belated Media's re-imagining of the prequels... Especially if he ever does III.
Posted on 2/11/15 at 12:13 am to UsingUpAllTheLetters
I've never heard of those. Yeah, that story he came up with would have been way better.
I like the idea of Dooku being the leader of the Separatists as a way to oppose Palpatine.
I like the idea of Dooku being the leader of the Separatists as a way to oppose Palpatine.
Posted on 2/11/15 at 12:20 am to catholictigerfan
quote:
BTW where does 7 fit in this timeline?
Like 30 years after Return of the Jedi (SW6).
Posted on 2/11/15 at 1:00 am to Hermit Crab
Am I the only one who thought Return of the Jedi was terrible? fricking Ewoks ruined the movie for me. Revenge of the Sith was a much better film. Actually, Lucas probably should have just condensed the entire prequel trilogy into one long film. Spend the first 60 minutes chronicling Anakin's beginnings and rise to power while introducing Obi-Wan and the rest of the characters and then the last 120 minutes should be devoted entirely to the Revenge of the Sith storyline. It would have been great if done right plus a ton of people would still be pumped up about the upcoming new films. Making nine films is just overkill at this point.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News